小组论文评分的过程指标:评估数据和在线行为的学习分析

Q4 Social Sciences Athens Journal of Education Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.30958/aje.10-4-2
Mei-Shiu Chiu, Ya Ping (Amy) Hsiao
{"title":"小组论文评分的过程指标:评估数据和在线行为的学习分析","authors":"Mei-Shiu Chiu, Ya Ping (Amy) Hsiao","doi":"10.30958/aje.10-4-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to identify process-related indicators for grading group essays. The research participants were students registered in a teacher-training course using an instructional design with face-to-face and digital blended learning. The course required the students in small collaborative groups to design, implement, and evaluate a teaching program using creative pedagogical designs, which were documented using group essays. Four indicators relating to group essays along the course process were collected: (A) group essay grades assessed by different agents, (B) students’ other course grades or behaviours (i.e., multiple assessments) as well as (C) comment behaviours and (D) version history behaviours through an online co-editing system (i.e., Google Docs). Statistical analysis results indicated that the instructor’s group essay grades were related to the group essay grades assessed by out-group peers (i.e. peers from other groups), online group comment frequencies, and online group comment interaction density. Keywords: assessment methods and tools, collaborative learning, essay grading, learning analytics, higher education","PeriodicalId":36453,"journal":{"name":"Athens Journal of Education","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Indicators for Grading Group Essays: Learning Analytics of Assessment Data and Online Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Mei-Shiu Chiu, Ya Ping (Amy) Hsiao\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/aje.10-4-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to identify process-related indicators for grading group essays. The research participants were students registered in a teacher-training course using an instructional design with face-to-face and digital blended learning. The course required the students in small collaborative groups to design, implement, and evaluate a teaching program using creative pedagogical designs, which were documented using group essays. Four indicators relating to group essays along the course process were collected: (A) group essay grades assessed by different agents, (B) students’ other course grades or behaviours (i.e., multiple assessments) as well as (C) comment behaviours and (D) version history behaviours through an online co-editing system (i.e., Google Docs). Statistical analysis results indicated that the instructor’s group essay grades were related to the group essay grades assessed by out-group peers (i.e. peers from other groups), online group comment frequencies, and online group comment interaction density. Keywords: assessment methods and tools, collaborative learning, essay grading, learning analytics, higher education\",\"PeriodicalId\":36453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Athens Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Athens Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-4-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-4-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定与过程相关的指标,为小组论文评分。研究参与者是注册了教师培训课程的学生,使用面对面和数字混合学习的教学设计。这门课程要求学生以小组合作的形式设计、实施和评估一个教学计划,使用创造性的教学设计,并以小组论文的形式记录。收集了与课程过程中小组论文相关的四个指标:(A)由不同代理评估的小组论文成绩,(B)学生的其他课程成绩或行为(即多次评估)以及(C)评论行为和(D)通过在线共同编辑系统(即Google Docs)的版本历史行为。统计分析结果表明,教师的小组作文成绩与小组外同伴(即其他小组的同伴)评估的小组作文成绩、网上小组评论频率和网上小组评论互动密度有关。关键词:评估方法和工具,协作学习,论文评分,学习分析,高等教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Process Indicators for Grading Group Essays: Learning Analytics of Assessment Data and Online Behaviour
The aim of this study was to identify process-related indicators for grading group essays. The research participants were students registered in a teacher-training course using an instructional design with face-to-face and digital blended learning. The course required the students in small collaborative groups to design, implement, and evaluate a teaching program using creative pedagogical designs, which were documented using group essays. Four indicators relating to group essays along the course process were collected: (A) group essay grades assessed by different agents, (B) students’ other course grades or behaviours (i.e., multiple assessments) as well as (C) comment behaviours and (D) version history behaviours through an online co-editing system (i.e., Google Docs). Statistical analysis results indicated that the instructor’s group essay grades were related to the group essay grades assessed by out-group peers (i.e. peers from other groups), online group comment frequencies, and online group comment interaction density. Keywords: assessment methods and tools, collaborative learning, essay grading, learning analytics, higher education
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Athens Journal of Education
Athens Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering Students' Active Participation in Higher Education: The Role of Teacher-student Rapport Metacognitive Strategies and Tendency to be Open to Learning: A Predictive Study Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Potential Impact on the Future of Higher Education COVID-19 Global Pandemic Upheaval: CTE Teachers Response in the United States Supporting Distributed Learning through Immersive Learning Environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1