背桥钢板固定在手术治疗 Lisfranc 损伤中的应用 - 一项中期随访的回顾性队列研究

Q2 Health Professions Foot Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2023.102061
Martin S. Davey , David O’Sullivan , Fergus J. McCabe , Paula McQuail , Stephen R. Kearns
{"title":"背桥钢板固定在手术治疗 Lisfranc 损伤中的应用 - 一项中期随访的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Martin S. Davey ,&nbsp;David O’Sullivan ,&nbsp;Fergus J. McCabe ,&nbsp;Paula McQuail ,&nbsp;Stephen R. Kearns","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2023.102061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Traditionally, early surgical management of Lisfranc injuries with transarticular screws (TAS) was deemed to be the optimal treatment. However, concerns of potential iatrogenic </span>articular cartilage disruption has led to discrepancies in opinion amongst surgeons, with many surgeons now utilizing dorsal bridge plates (DBP) for </span>ORIF of Lisfranc injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes at medium-term follow-up of consecutive patients in our institution who underwent ORIF with DBP for Lisfranc injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive patients who underwent ORIF with DBPs for Lisfranc injuries were identified. Outcomes of interest included; visual analogue scale<span> (VAS), functional foot index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Surgeons (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, and complications.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 37 consecutive patients (24 males) with a mean age of 34.8 ± 13.0 years underwent ORIF with DBPs for lisfranc injuries. After a mean 48.3 ± 28.7 months, the mean reported AOFAS and FFI scores were 77.4 ± 23.8 and 31.9 ± 32.7 respectively, with satisfactory reported pain scores as measured by VAS post-operatively at rest and whilst walking (2.2 ± 2.5 and 3.1 ± 2.6 respectively). The reported satisfaction rate was 86.5% (32/37). Overall, 25 patients (67.6%) had subsequent removal of metal or were listed for same, 88% (22/25) of whom did so electively in the absence of broken screws or infection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found that the use of Dorsal Bridge Plates for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries resulted in satisfactory functional outcomes, high rates of patient-reported satisfaction and a low complication rate at medium-term follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV; Retrospective Series of Consecutive Patients</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Dorsal Bridge Plate Fixation in the Operative Management of Lisfranc Injuries – A Retrospective Cohort Study at Medium Term Follow-Up\",\"authors\":\"Martin S. Davey ,&nbsp;David O’Sullivan ,&nbsp;Fergus J. McCabe ,&nbsp;Paula McQuail ,&nbsp;Stephen R. Kearns\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foot.2023.102061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Traditionally, early surgical management of Lisfranc injuries with transarticular screws (TAS) was deemed to be the optimal treatment. However, concerns of potential iatrogenic </span>articular cartilage disruption has led to discrepancies in opinion amongst surgeons, with many surgeons now utilizing dorsal bridge plates (DBP) for </span>ORIF of Lisfranc injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes at medium-term follow-up of consecutive patients in our institution who underwent ORIF with DBP for Lisfranc injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive patients who underwent ORIF with DBPs for Lisfranc injuries were identified. Outcomes of interest included; visual analogue scale<span> (VAS), functional foot index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Surgeons (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, and complications.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 37 consecutive patients (24 males) with a mean age of 34.8 ± 13.0 years underwent ORIF with DBPs for lisfranc injuries. After a mean 48.3 ± 28.7 months, the mean reported AOFAS and FFI scores were 77.4 ± 23.8 and 31.9 ± 32.7 respectively, with satisfactory reported pain scores as measured by VAS post-operatively at rest and whilst walking (2.2 ± 2.5 and 3.1 ± 2.6 respectively). The reported satisfaction rate was 86.5% (32/37). Overall, 25 patients (67.6%) had subsequent removal of metal or were listed for same, 88% (22/25) of whom did so electively in the absence of broken screws or infection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found that the use of Dorsal Bridge Plates for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries resulted in satisfactory functional outcomes, high rates of patient-reported satisfaction and a low complication rate at medium-term follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV; Retrospective Series of Consecutive Patients</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259223001025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259223001025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言传统上,使用经关节螺钉(TAS)对Lisfranc损伤进行早期手术治疗被认为是最佳治疗方法。然而,由于担心潜在的先天性关节软骨破坏,外科医生之间出现了意见分歧,现在很多外科医生都采用背侧桥板(DBP)进行Lisfranc损伤的ORIF。研究结果包括:视觉模拟量表(VAS)、足部功能指数(FFI)、美国骨科足与踝外科医生(AOFAS)后足评分和并发症。结果总计37名连续患者(24名男性)接受了ORIF与DBP治疗lisfranc损伤,平均年龄为(34.8±13.0)岁。平均48.3±28.7个月后,AOFAS和FFI平均评分分别为77.4±23.8和31.9±32.7,术后休息和行走时的VAS疼痛评分令人满意(分别为2.2±2.5和3.1±2.6)。满意率为 86.5%(32/37)。总体而言,25 名患者(67.6%)随后进行了金属移除或被列入了金属移除名单,其中 88% 的患者(22/25)在没有螺钉断裂或感染的情况下选择了金属移除。 结论:该研究发现,使用背侧桥式钢板进行Lisfranc损伤的开放复位和内固定术可获得令人满意的功能结果,患者报告的满意度高,中期随访时并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Dorsal Bridge Plate Fixation in the Operative Management of Lisfranc Injuries – A Retrospective Cohort Study at Medium Term Follow-Up

Introduction

Traditionally, early surgical management of Lisfranc injuries with transarticular screws (TAS) was deemed to be the optimal treatment. However, concerns of potential iatrogenic articular cartilage disruption has led to discrepancies in opinion amongst surgeons, with many surgeons now utilizing dorsal bridge plates (DBP) for ORIF of Lisfranc injuries.

Objectives

This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes at medium-term follow-up of consecutive patients in our institution who underwent ORIF with DBP for Lisfranc injuries.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent ORIF with DBPs for Lisfranc injuries were identified. Outcomes of interest included; visual analogue scale (VAS), functional foot index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Surgeons (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, and complications.

Results

Overall, 37 consecutive patients (24 males) with a mean age of 34.8 ± 13.0 years underwent ORIF with DBPs for lisfranc injuries. After a mean 48.3 ± 28.7 months, the mean reported AOFAS and FFI scores were 77.4 ± 23.8 and 31.9 ± 32.7 respectively, with satisfactory reported pain scores as measured by VAS post-operatively at rest and whilst walking (2.2 ± 2.5 and 3.1 ± 2.6 respectively). The reported satisfaction rate was 86.5% (32/37). Overall, 25 patients (67.6%) had subsequent removal of metal or were listed for same, 88% (22/25) of whom did so electively in the absence of broken screws or infection.

Conclusion

This study found that the use of Dorsal Bridge Plates for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries resulted in satisfactory functional outcomes, high rates of patient-reported satisfaction and a low complication rate at medium-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence

Level IV; Retrospective Series of Consecutive Patients

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of custom hard-shell 3D-printed foot orthoses in a cohort of patients who did not respond to treatment with custom ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) foot orthoses Regional changes in the free Achilles tendon volume in response to repeated submaximal contractions Mechanical drivers of intrinsic foot muscle for maximum toe flexor strength in upright standing across different body size Accuracy and reliability of the Ipswich touch test in identifying loss of protective sensation among diabetic patients Predictors of poor pre-operative patient reported outcome measures in elective foot and ankle surgery: Analysis of 1217 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1