辅助与替代沟通(AAC)相关的教师培训内容与实施方法:系统文献综述

Sook Wei Loi, Syar Meeze Mohd Rashid, Hasnah Toran
{"title":"辅助与替代沟通(AAC)相关的教师培训内容与实施方法:系统文献综述","authors":"Sook Wei Loi, Syar Meeze Mohd Rashid, Hasnah Toran","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.22.10.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) is one of the methods used to assist students with communication problems, particularly those in special education who suffer from speech delay and total loss of speech, for example, those with processed autism, cerebral palsy, or intellectual disabilities. The implementation of AAC in Malaysia’s schools falls primarily on the shoulders of special education teachers. However, past research has demonstrated that most special education teachers do not undergo enough teacher training to equip themselves with skills and knowledge in the field of AAC. There is scant literature about teacher training related to AAC as there has been a lack of guidelines in terms of AAC training for educators. Therefore, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out to identify teacher training in AAC in terms of content and delivery method so that it can be used as a reference for an upcoming teacher training course. By using PRISMA, as a guideline, the Google Scholar and Scopus databases yielded a total of 18 articles. Findings reveal that previous teacher preparation programmes did not go into detail about delivery methods, particularly when it comes to how theory and practical experience are combined to maximise learning for collaborative skills and AAC-related information that was becoming more technologically advanced and online-based. Future studies should examine how each delivery modality impacts teacher learning in AAC and how to enhance in-field training to reduce the gap between theory and practice concerns in teacher preparation.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Training’s Content and Delivery Method Related to Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR)\",\"authors\":\"Sook Wei Loi, Syar Meeze Mohd Rashid, Hasnah Toran\",\"doi\":\"10.26803/ijlter.22.10.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) is one of the methods used to assist students with communication problems, particularly those in special education who suffer from speech delay and total loss of speech, for example, those with processed autism, cerebral palsy, or intellectual disabilities. The implementation of AAC in Malaysia’s schools falls primarily on the shoulders of special education teachers. However, past research has demonstrated that most special education teachers do not undergo enough teacher training to equip themselves with skills and knowledge in the field of AAC. There is scant literature about teacher training related to AAC as there has been a lack of guidelines in terms of AAC training for educators. Therefore, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out to identify teacher training in AAC in terms of content and delivery method so that it can be used as a reference for an upcoming teacher training course. By using PRISMA, as a guideline, the Google Scholar and Scopus databases yielded a total of 18 articles. Findings reveal that previous teacher preparation programmes did not go into detail about delivery methods, particularly when it comes to how theory and practical experience are combined to maximise learning for collaborative skills and AAC-related information that was becoming more technologically advanced and online-based. Future studies should examine how each delivery modality impacts teacher learning in AAC and how to enhance in-field training to reduce the gap between theory and practice concerns in teacher preparation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.10.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.10.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助和替代沟通(AAC)是一种用于帮助有沟通问题的学生的方法,特别是那些在特殊教育中患有语言延迟和完全丧失语言能力的学生,例如那些患有加工性自闭症、脑瘫或智力残疾的学生。在马来西亚的学校实施AAC主要落在特殊教育教师的肩上。然而,过去的研究表明,大多数特殊教育教师没有接受足够的教师培训,以使自己具备AAC领域的技能和知识。由于缺乏对教育者进行AAC培训的指导方针,因此关于AAC教师培训的文献很少。因此,本研究通过系统文献综述(SLR)来确定AAC教师培训的内容和交付方式,以便为即将开展的教师培训课程提供参考。通过使用PRISMA作为指导,Google Scholar和Scopus数据库总共产生了18篇文章。研究结果显示,以前的教师培训计划没有详细介绍教学方法,特别是在如何将理论和实践经验结合起来,以最大限度地提高协作技能和aac相关信息的学习方面,这些信息在技术上变得更加先进和基于网络。未来的研究应该考察每种交付方式如何影响AAC教师的学习,以及如何加强现场培训,以缩小教师准备理论与实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teacher Training’s Content and Delivery Method Related to Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) is one of the methods used to assist students with communication problems, particularly those in special education who suffer from speech delay and total loss of speech, for example, those with processed autism, cerebral palsy, or intellectual disabilities. The implementation of AAC in Malaysia’s schools falls primarily on the shoulders of special education teachers. However, past research has demonstrated that most special education teachers do not undergo enough teacher training to equip themselves with skills and knowledge in the field of AAC. There is scant literature about teacher training related to AAC as there has been a lack of guidelines in terms of AAC training for educators. Therefore, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was carried out to identify teacher training in AAC in terms of content and delivery method so that it can be used as a reference for an upcoming teacher training course. By using PRISMA, as a guideline, the Google Scholar and Scopus databases yielded a total of 18 articles. Findings reveal that previous teacher preparation programmes did not go into detail about delivery methods, particularly when it comes to how theory and practical experience are combined to maximise learning for collaborative skills and AAC-related information that was becoming more technologically advanced and online-based. Future studies should examine how each delivery modality impacts teacher learning in AAC and how to enhance in-field training to reduce the gap between theory and practice concerns in teacher preparation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Linguistic Landscapes for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Cuenca, Ecuador Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy: A Case Study in Vietnam Reflection Analysis of Resilient and Sustainable Research and Publication Activities at the National University of Science & Technology, Oman during COVID-19 The Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Improving Reading Skill among Thai EFL Undergraduates and Their Attitudes toward this Strategy Testing the Healthy School Organisation Instrument (i-OS) and the Holistic Psychological Well-Being Model of School Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1