Allison Negron-Campbell, Samantha E. Goldman, Nanho Vander Hart
{"title":"行为评估和干预基础的专业发展:学区工作人员对学区工作人员的培训","authors":"Allison Negron-Campbell, Samantha E. Goldman, Nanho Vander Hart","doi":"10.1080/1045988x.2023.2259823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractResearch shows that schools struggle with conducting high quality functional behavior assessments (FBA) and implementing effective behavior intervention plans (BIP). Access to training is a documented challenge to effective implementation. One training with preliminary empirical support is Basic FBA. This pilot study extended the research on Basic FBA to determine whether the intervention could be implemented effectively by district staff. Fourteen staff working in an urban school district completed within-district training consisting of four modules on FBA/BIP with aligned between-session assignments; half were randomly assigned to receive coaching support. Participants increased their knowledge and skill in FBA/BIP and rated the training as socially acceptable. Differences in outcomes for coached and control groups were minimal, with some higher social validity ratings and more FBA/BIPS developed by those receiving coaching.Keywords: Behavior intervention plancoachingfunctional behavioral assessmentstaff training AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the school district employees who participated in this study as well as the administrative support of Triada Frangou-Apostolou and the SEL Leadership Team. Special thanks for the project coaches, Nicole Bradley, Naomi Haaker, Tracey Swenson, and Lacey Hale who dedicated many hours to supporting the success of this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingFunding for this research was provided through the Office of the Provost at Assumption University.Notes on contributorsAllison Negron-CampbellAllison Negron-Campbell is District Focused Instructional Coach for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in the Climate and Culture Department of the Worcester Public Schools in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her current research interests are multi-tiered systems of support in social emotional learning and behavior, school culture and climate, and functional behavior assessment and interventions.Samantha E. GoldmanSamantha Goldman is an associate professor of special education at Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her research focuses on family-school partnership, alternative dispute resolution, supporting students with autism and challenging behavior, and special education teacher preparation.Nanho Vander HartNanho Vander Hart is the director and an associate professor of special education at Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her current research interests are inclusive education, handwriting, writing instruction, and special education teacher preparation.","PeriodicalId":46774,"journal":{"name":"Preventing School Failure","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional development on the basics of behavior assessment and intervention: training by school district staff for district staff\",\"authors\":\"Allison Negron-Campbell, Samantha E. Goldman, Nanho Vander Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1045988x.2023.2259823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractResearch shows that schools struggle with conducting high quality functional behavior assessments (FBA) and implementing effective behavior intervention plans (BIP). Access to training is a documented challenge to effective implementation. One training with preliminary empirical support is Basic FBA. This pilot study extended the research on Basic FBA to determine whether the intervention could be implemented effectively by district staff. Fourteen staff working in an urban school district completed within-district training consisting of four modules on FBA/BIP with aligned between-session assignments; half were randomly assigned to receive coaching support. Participants increased their knowledge and skill in FBA/BIP and rated the training as socially acceptable. Differences in outcomes for coached and control groups were minimal, with some higher social validity ratings and more FBA/BIPS developed by those receiving coaching.Keywords: Behavior intervention plancoachingfunctional behavioral assessmentstaff training AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the school district employees who participated in this study as well as the administrative support of Triada Frangou-Apostolou and the SEL Leadership Team. Special thanks for the project coaches, Nicole Bradley, Naomi Haaker, Tracey Swenson, and Lacey Hale who dedicated many hours to supporting the success of this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingFunding for this research was provided through the Office of the Provost at Assumption University.Notes on contributorsAllison Negron-CampbellAllison Negron-Campbell is District Focused Instructional Coach for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in the Climate and Culture Department of the Worcester Public Schools in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her current research interests are multi-tiered systems of support in social emotional learning and behavior, school culture and climate, and functional behavior assessment and interventions.Samantha E. GoldmanSamantha Goldman is an associate professor of special education at Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her research focuses on family-school partnership, alternative dispute resolution, supporting students with autism and challenging behavior, and special education teacher preparation.Nanho Vander HartNanho Vander Hart is the director and an associate professor of special education at Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her current research interests are inclusive education, handwriting, writing instruction, and special education teacher preparation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2023.2259823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing School Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2023.2259823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Professional development on the basics of behavior assessment and intervention: training by school district staff for district staff
AbstractResearch shows that schools struggle with conducting high quality functional behavior assessments (FBA) and implementing effective behavior intervention plans (BIP). Access to training is a documented challenge to effective implementation. One training with preliminary empirical support is Basic FBA. This pilot study extended the research on Basic FBA to determine whether the intervention could be implemented effectively by district staff. Fourteen staff working in an urban school district completed within-district training consisting of four modules on FBA/BIP with aligned between-session assignments; half were randomly assigned to receive coaching support. Participants increased their knowledge and skill in FBA/BIP and rated the training as socially acceptable. Differences in outcomes for coached and control groups were minimal, with some higher social validity ratings and more FBA/BIPS developed by those receiving coaching.Keywords: Behavior intervention plancoachingfunctional behavioral assessmentstaff training AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the school district employees who participated in this study as well as the administrative support of Triada Frangou-Apostolou and the SEL Leadership Team. Special thanks for the project coaches, Nicole Bradley, Naomi Haaker, Tracey Swenson, and Lacey Hale who dedicated many hours to supporting the success of this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingFunding for this research was provided through the Office of the Provost at Assumption University.Notes on contributorsAllison Negron-CampbellAllison Negron-Campbell is District Focused Instructional Coach for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in the Climate and Culture Department of the Worcester Public Schools in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her current research interests are multi-tiered systems of support in social emotional learning and behavior, school culture and climate, and functional behavior assessment and interventions.Samantha E. GoldmanSamantha Goldman is an associate professor of special education at Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her research focuses on family-school partnership, alternative dispute resolution, supporting students with autism and challenging behavior, and special education teacher preparation.Nanho Vander HartNanho Vander Hart is the director and an associate professor of special education at Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Her current research interests are inclusive education, handwriting, writing instruction, and special education teacher preparation.
期刊介绍:
Preventing School Failure provides a forum in which to examine critically emerging and evidence-based practices that are both data driven and practical for children and youth in general and alternative education systems. Authors are afforded the opportunity to discuss and debate critical and sometimes controversial issues that affect the education of children and adolescents in various settings. Preventing School Failure is a peer-reviewed academic journal for administrators, educators, mental health workers, juvenile justice and corrections personnel, day and residential treatment personnel, staff-development specialists, teacher educators, and others. Our goal is to share authoritative and timely information with a wide-ranging audience dedicated to serving children and adolescents in general education, special education, and alternative education programs. We accept for review manuscripts that contain critical and integrated literature reviews, objective program evaluations, evidence-based strategies and procedures, program descriptions, and policy-related content. As appropriate, manuscripts should contain enough detail that readers are able to put useful or innovative strategies or procedures into practice.