管理邪恶问题的集体智慧方法的内部运作-一个评估模型和评估

IF 1.7 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Communications of the Association for Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17705/1cais.05249
Henner Gimpel, Robert Laubacher, Dominik Parak, Manfred Schoch, Moritz Wöhl
{"title":"管理邪恶问题的集体智慧方法的内部运作-一个评估模型和评估","authors":"Henner Gimpel, Robert Laubacher, Dominik Parak, Manfred Schoch, Moritz Wöhl","doi":"10.17705/1cais.05249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ill-defined and complex problems that affect multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting perspectives are often referred to as wicked problems. The utilization of collective intelligence (CI) via web-based platforms is a promising approach for addressing such wicked problems. The management of these information systems would benefit from evidence-based decision support regarding facilitation and improvement efforts. However, to date, there is no suitable model to guide such efforts. Existing approaches address specific applications or cover certain assessment areas but do not provide a holistic perspective. Meanwhile, research offers substantial insights into best practices for addressing wicked problems and running CI applications. This paper develops an assessment model comprising five central success dimensions for information systems that address wicked problems. Their subdimensions and associated measurement metrics allow for evidence-driven facilitation and improvement of CI applications for wicked problems. Apart from the model’s capability to improve future runs and processes, it also offers the potential to provide immediate insights for facilitation efforts during runtime. The model was validated with a platform dealing with the assessment of risks presented by global climate change. This evaluation generated strong evidence for the model’s applicability and usefulness.","PeriodicalId":47724,"journal":{"name":"Communications of the Association for Information Systems","volume":"54 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing the Inner Workings of Collective Intelligence Approaches for Wicked Problems – An Assessment Model and Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Henner Gimpel, Robert Laubacher, Dominik Parak, Manfred Schoch, Moritz Wöhl\",\"doi\":\"10.17705/1cais.05249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ill-defined and complex problems that affect multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting perspectives are often referred to as wicked problems. The utilization of collective intelligence (CI) via web-based platforms is a promising approach for addressing such wicked problems. The management of these information systems would benefit from evidence-based decision support regarding facilitation and improvement efforts. However, to date, there is no suitable model to guide such efforts. Existing approaches address specific applications or cover certain assessment areas but do not provide a holistic perspective. Meanwhile, research offers substantial insights into best practices for addressing wicked problems and running CI applications. This paper develops an assessment model comprising five central success dimensions for information systems that address wicked problems. Their subdimensions and associated measurement metrics allow for evidence-driven facilitation and improvement of CI applications for wicked problems. Apart from the model’s capability to improve future runs and processes, it also offers the potential to provide immediate insights for facilitation efforts during runtime. The model was validated with a platform dealing with the assessment of risks presented by global climate change. This evaluation generated strong evidence for the model’s applicability and usefulness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications of the Association for Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications of the Association for Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications of the Association for Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定义不清且复杂的问题会影响到具有潜在冲突观点的多个涉众,这些问题通常被称为邪恶问题。通过基于web的平台利用集体智慧(CI)是解决此类棘手问题的一种很有前途的方法。这些信息系统的管理将受益于关于促进和改进工作的循证决策支持。然而,到目前为止,还没有合适的模式来指导这种努力。现有的方法处理特定的应用程序或覆盖某些评估领域,但不提供整体的观点。同时,研究为解决棘手问题和运行CI应用程序的最佳实践提供了实质性的见解。本文开发了一个评估模型,包括五个核心成功维度的信息系统,解决邪恶的问题。它们的子维度和相关的度量标准允许证据驱动的CI应用程序的简化和改进,以解决棘手的问题。除了模型改进未来运行和流程的能力之外,它还提供了在运行期间为简化工作提供即时见解的潜力。该模型通过一个处理全球气候变化风险评估的平台进行了验证。这个评估为模型的适用性和有用性提供了强有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing the Inner Workings of Collective Intelligence Approaches for Wicked Problems – An Assessment Model and Evaluation
Ill-defined and complex problems that affect multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting perspectives are often referred to as wicked problems. The utilization of collective intelligence (CI) via web-based platforms is a promising approach for addressing such wicked problems. The management of these information systems would benefit from evidence-based decision support regarding facilitation and improvement efforts. However, to date, there is no suitable model to guide such efforts. Existing approaches address specific applications or cover certain assessment areas but do not provide a holistic perspective. Meanwhile, research offers substantial insights into best practices for addressing wicked problems and running CI applications. This paper develops an assessment model comprising five central success dimensions for information systems that address wicked problems. Their subdimensions and associated measurement metrics allow for evidence-driven facilitation and improvement of CI applications for wicked problems. Apart from the model’s capability to improve future runs and processes, it also offers the potential to provide immediate insights for facilitation efforts during runtime. The model was validated with a platform dealing with the assessment of risks presented by global climate change. This evaluation generated strong evidence for the model’s applicability and usefulness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Communications of the Association for Information Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
MaCuDE IS Task Force Phase II Report: Views of Industry Leaders on Big Data Analytics and AI Learner Engagement with YouTube Videos in Informal Online Learning: An Investigation of the Effects of Segmenting, Signaling, and Weeding Blending Modalities, Pedagogies, and Technologies: Redesigning an Information Systems Course to Encourage Engagement Children’s E-Learning Interactions and Perceived Outcomes with Educational Key Opinion Leaders in China Indigenizing the IT Curriculum by Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1