执行功能如何影响儿童对数学和科学中反直觉概念的推理?

IF 1.8 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Cognitive Enhancement Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0
Iroise Dumontheil, Hannah R. Wilkinson, Emily K. Farran, Claire Smid, Roshni Modhvadia, Denis Mareschal, Derek Bell, Annie Brookman-Byrne, Andrea Gauthier, Roos de Jong, Wayne Holmes, Sveta Mayer, Su Morris, Kaśka Porayska-Pomsta, Dilini Sumanapala, Michael Thomas, Andy Tolmie
{"title":"执行功能如何影响儿童对数学和科学中反直觉概念的推理?","authors":"Iroise Dumontheil, Hannah R. Wilkinson, Emily K. Farran, Claire Smid, Roshni Modhvadia, Denis Mareschal, Derek Bell, Annie Brookman-Byrne, Andrea Gauthier, Roos de Jong, Wayne Holmes, Sveta Mayer, Su Morris, Kaśka Porayska-Pomsta, Dilini Sumanapala, Michael Thomas, Andy Tolmie","doi":"10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children’s mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement , 4 , 296–314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017.","PeriodicalId":15498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Enhancement","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Executive Functions Influence Children’s Reasoning About Counterintuitive Concepts in Mathematics and Science?\",\"authors\":\"Iroise Dumontheil, Hannah R. Wilkinson, Emily K. Farran, Claire Smid, Roshni Modhvadia, Denis Mareschal, Derek Bell, Annie Brookman-Byrne, Andrea Gauthier, Roos de Jong, Wayne Holmes, Sveta Mayer, Su Morris, Kaśka Porayska-Pomsta, Dilini Sumanapala, Michael Thomas, Andy Tolmie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children’s mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement , 4 , 296–314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Enhancement\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Enhancement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多科学和数学概念是违反直觉的,因为它们与我们从日常世界经验中建立起来的误导性知觉线索或不正确的幼稚理论相冲突。执行功能(EFs)影响数学和科学成就,特别是抑制控制(IC)可能促进反直觉推理。停止,Think是一种计算机化的学习活动,用于训练集成电路技能。在一项大规模的随机对照试验中,它被发现对提高小学生的数学和科学学业成绩有效(Palak et al., 2019;Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4,296 - 314,2020)。本研究旨在探讨ef在反直觉数学和科学推理中的作用,以及S&T训练的调节作用。372名3年级(7- 8岁)和5年级(9- 10岁)的儿童被分配到S&T、主动控制或正常教学组,并在训练前后完成评估语言和视觉空间工作记忆(WM)、IC、IQ和反直觉推理的任务。反直觉推理和EF之间的横断面关联在五年级儿童中被发现,有证据表明言语WM的特定作用。干预只对三年级儿童的反直觉推理有好处,EF测量并不能预测哪些儿童从干预中获益最多。结合之前的研究,这些结果表明,在年幼的儿童中,EF的个体差异对反直觉推理的影响较小,而年龄较大的儿童在EF和反直觉推理之间表现出更大的关联,并且能够将在S&T训练期间开发的策略应用于数学和科学科目。这项工作有助于理解为什么标普干预是有效的。该作品已于2017年10月10日在ISRCTN注册中心(TRN: 54726482)预注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Do Executive Functions Influence Children’s Reasoning About Counterintuitive Concepts in Mathematics and Science?
Abstract Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children’s mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement , 4 , 296–314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Guiding Human Navigation with Noninvasive Vestibular Stimulation and Evoked Mediolateral Sway Saccade Induced Retrieval Enhancement, Handedness & the Retrieval of Central & Peripheral Details in Eyewitness Memory Human Enhancement Without Organizational Knowledge and by Organizational Order Challenge Not Only to the Muscles—Surface Instability Shifts Attentional Demands in Young and Older Adults While Performing Resistance Exercise The Effect of Post-activation Performance Enhancement of Coincidence Anticipation Timing in Basketball Players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1