{"title":"阅读上帝之手","authors":"Conrad Fischer","doi":"10.1163/18796583-12340077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Andreas Gryphius is known as a poet and scholar, but less as a chiromancer. His biographers, however, identify him as such. This article wants to show, on the basis of wide-ranging textual evidence, that Gryphius has a differentiated relationship to chiromancy and knows how to combine appreciation and criticism in the ironic play of his epigrams, in accordance with the early modern scholarly dispute about chiromancy.","PeriodicalId":52008,"journal":{"name":"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aus der Hand Gott(es) lesen\",\"authors\":\"Conrad Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18796583-12340077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Andreas Gryphius is known as a poet and scholar, but less as a chiromancer. His biographers, however, identify him as such. This article wants to show, on the basis of wide-ranging textual evidence, that Gryphius has a differentiated relationship to chiromancy and knows how to combine appreciation and criticism in the ironic play of his epigrams, in accordance with the early modern scholarly dispute about chiromancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR\",\"volume\":\"228 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18796583-12340077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18796583-12340077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Andreas Gryphius is known as a poet and scholar, but less as a chiromancer. His biographers, however, identify him as such. This article wants to show, on the basis of wide-ranging textual evidence, that Gryphius has a differentiated relationship to chiromancy and knows how to combine appreciation and criticism in the ironic play of his epigrams, in accordance with the early modern scholarly dispute about chiromancy.
期刊介绍：
Der "Daphnis" ist als Organ für die Erforschung der deutschen und neulateinischen Literatur vom Ausgang des 14. Jahrhunderts bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts konzipiert worden. Er berücksichtigt darüber hinaus unter komparatistischem Aspekt auch die Beziehungen der Mittleren Deutschen Literatur zu den europäischen Literaturen dieses Zeitraums und widmet sich Problemen der frühneuhochdeutschen und neulateinischen Sprache.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
