耕作制度对不同土壤类型质量的影响

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.15414/afz.2023.26.03.332-341
Nora Pollakova
{"title":"耕作制度对不同土壤类型质量的影响","authors":"Nora Pollakova","doi":"10.15414/afz.2023.26.03.332-341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tillage technology used can influence the soil quality positively or negatively. The aim of this work was to compare the impact of reduced (RT) and conventional (CT) tillage technologies on selected physical and chemical properties of Mollic Fluvisol, Chernozem, and Haplic Luvisol. Differences in the properties of soils treated with RT and CT were investigated at fifteen sites to a depth of 40 cm. The results showed that in Mollic Fluvisol, which naturally has higher soil organic matter (SOM) content, changing the tillage system from CT to RT caused minimal negative changes in soil properties, including a significant increase in bulk density (rd), a decrease in available water capacity (QP) and hot water soluble carbon (CHWL); in contrast, the change in tillage system was positively reflected in a statistically significant increase in total organic carbon (Cox) and degree of humification. For Chernozem and Haplic Luvisol, which naturally have medium to low SOM content, changing tillage from CT to RT resulted in a significant decrease in CHWL content and degree of humification. All physical parameters assessed were significantly deteriorated (there was an increase in rd and wilting point, a significant decrease in air-filled porosity and QP. There was no significant improvement in any of the soil properties studied. It can be concluded that the CT system is more suitable for Chernozem and Haplic Luvisol tillage than the RT system. In Mollic Fluvisol, the RT system is more or less equally suitable for tillage as the CT system.","PeriodicalId":7312,"journal":{"name":"Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of tillage systems on the quality of different soil types\",\"authors\":\"Nora Pollakova\",\"doi\":\"10.15414/afz.2023.26.03.332-341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tillage technology used can influence the soil quality positively or negatively. The aim of this work was to compare the impact of reduced (RT) and conventional (CT) tillage technologies on selected physical and chemical properties of Mollic Fluvisol, Chernozem, and Haplic Luvisol. Differences in the properties of soils treated with RT and CT were investigated at fifteen sites to a depth of 40 cm. The results showed that in Mollic Fluvisol, which naturally has higher soil organic matter (SOM) content, changing the tillage system from CT to RT caused minimal negative changes in soil properties, including a significant increase in bulk density (rd), a decrease in available water capacity (QP) and hot water soluble carbon (CHWL); in contrast, the change in tillage system was positively reflected in a statistically significant increase in total organic carbon (Cox) and degree of humification. For Chernozem and Haplic Luvisol, which naturally have medium to low SOM content, changing tillage from CT to RT resulted in a significant decrease in CHWL content and degree of humification. All physical parameters assessed were significantly deteriorated (there was an increase in rd and wilting point, a significant decrease in air-filled porosity and QP. There was no significant improvement in any of the soil properties studied. It can be concluded that the CT system is more suitable for Chernozem and Haplic Luvisol tillage than the RT system. In Mollic Fluvisol, the RT system is more or less equally suitable for tillage as the CT system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2023.26.03.332-341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2023.26.03.332-341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所采用的耕作技术对土壤质量有积极或消极的影响。本研究的目的是比较简化(RT)和常规(CT)耕作技术对Mollic Fluvisol、Chernozem和Haplic Luvisol选定理化性质的影响。在深度为40 cm的15个地点研究了RT和CT处理的土壤性质的差异。结果表明,在土壤有机质(SOM)含量较高的Mollic Fluvisol中,将耕作制度从CT改为RT对土壤性质的负变化最小,包括容重(rd)显著增加,有效水量(QP)和热水溶性碳(CHWL)显著降低;相反,耕作制度的变化正反映在总有机碳(Cox)和腐殖化程度的增加上,具有统计学显著性。黑钙土和哈普利克露维索土天生具有中低的SOM含量,从CT耕作改为RT耕作导致CHWL含量和腐殖化程度显著降低。所有评估的物理参数都显著恶化(rd和萎蔫点增加,充气孔隙率和QP显著降低)。所研究的任何土壤性质都没有显著改善。结果表明,CT系统比RT系统更适合黑钙土和阔叶土的耕作。在Mollic Fluvisol中,RT系统或多或少与CT系统同样适合耕作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of tillage systems on the quality of different soil types
The tillage technology used can influence the soil quality positively or negatively. The aim of this work was to compare the impact of reduced (RT) and conventional (CT) tillage technologies on selected physical and chemical properties of Mollic Fluvisol, Chernozem, and Haplic Luvisol. Differences in the properties of soils treated with RT and CT were investigated at fifteen sites to a depth of 40 cm. The results showed that in Mollic Fluvisol, which naturally has higher soil organic matter (SOM) content, changing the tillage system from CT to RT caused minimal negative changes in soil properties, including a significant increase in bulk density (rd), a decrease in available water capacity (QP) and hot water soluble carbon (CHWL); in contrast, the change in tillage system was positively reflected in a statistically significant increase in total organic carbon (Cox) and degree of humification. For Chernozem and Haplic Luvisol, which naturally have medium to low SOM content, changing tillage from CT to RT resulted in a significant decrease in CHWL content and degree of humification. All physical parameters assessed were significantly deteriorated (there was an increase in rd and wilting point, a significant decrease in air-filled porosity and QP. There was no significant improvement in any of the soil properties studied. It can be concluded that the CT system is more suitable for Chernozem and Haplic Luvisol tillage than the RT system. In Mollic Fluvisol, the RT system is more or less equally suitable for tillage as the CT system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica
Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Feed Microbiology on the Growth of Holstein Calves Application of Endophytic Bacteria from Tomato Stems to Control Bacterial Wilt Disease in Tomato and Enhance Plant Growth Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Size-Fractions of Water-Stable Aggregates in Haplic Luvisol after Organic Amendment Fatty Acid Profile of Commercial Dry Puppies’ Food Effects of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) Supplementation in Hen Diets on Laying Productivity, Egg Quality, and Biochemical Parameters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1