某三级医院创伤重症监护病房呼吸机相关性肺炎的细菌学分析

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Marine Medical Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jmms.jmms_179_22
Bhasker Mukherjee, Neetu Mehrotra, Rajesh Karyakarte, Rajesh Sahu
{"title":"某三级医院创伤重症监护病房呼吸机相关性肺炎的细菌学分析","authors":"Bhasker Mukherjee, Neetu Mehrotra, Rajesh Karyakarte, Rajesh Sahu","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_179_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important cause of increased morbidity, mortality, duration of hospital stay, and increased health-care costs. It is the second-most common hospital-acquired infection associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identification of the spectrum of causative organisms of VAP is imperative in the proper utilization of antimicrobials for VAP and the prevention of multidrug resistance (MDR) organisms. Aim and Objective: The spectrum of organisms responsible for VAP in the trauma center of our tertiary care hospital is not known and additionally, the ideal use of antimicrobials for proper treatment of these cases had to be formulated. This study was planned to identify the organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria causing VAP in patients admitted to trauma intensive care unit (ICU) of this tertiary care general hospital. Materials and Methods: In this study, 150 cases of VAP from a trauma ICU were included, who met the criteria of VAP as per the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) samples were collected and processed for Gram stain; organisms were isolated and antibiotic sensitivity was performed by Kirby–Bauer method. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPI 23.0.0.0. Results: Our study showed predominantly Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (70.6%) in the isolates, Gram-positive cocci in 4.67% of isolates, and 2% polymicrobial. The most common organism isolated was Klebsiella pneumoniae (44.08%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (17.77%). K. pneumoniae showed maximum resistance to cefotaxime (98.51%) and most sensitivity to colistin (13.43%). Maximum resistance was seen against cefotaxime (97.08%) and least against moxifloxacin (37.96%) and colistin (13.08%). K. pneumoniae had the highest MDR (47.6%), followed by A. baumannii (17.14%). Conclusion: VAP is a significant cause of mortality in ICU settings. The significant isolation of GNB in ETAs and the resistance pattern seen in our study shows that judicious and appropriate use of antimicrobials in this setting would be highly beneficial to prevent the emergence of MDR organisms and reduce mortality in cases of VAP.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"57 57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacteriological profile of ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital\",\"authors\":\"Bhasker Mukherjee, Neetu Mehrotra, Rajesh Karyakarte, Rajesh Sahu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmms.jmms_179_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important cause of increased morbidity, mortality, duration of hospital stay, and increased health-care costs. It is the second-most common hospital-acquired infection associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identification of the spectrum of causative organisms of VAP is imperative in the proper utilization of antimicrobials for VAP and the prevention of multidrug resistance (MDR) organisms. Aim and Objective: The spectrum of organisms responsible for VAP in the trauma center of our tertiary care hospital is not known and additionally, the ideal use of antimicrobials for proper treatment of these cases had to be formulated. This study was planned to identify the organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria causing VAP in patients admitted to trauma intensive care unit (ICU) of this tertiary care general hospital. Materials and Methods: In this study, 150 cases of VAP from a trauma ICU were included, who met the criteria of VAP as per the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) samples were collected and processed for Gram stain; organisms were isolated and antibiotic sensitivity was performed by Kirby–Bauer method. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPI 23.0.0.0. Results: Our study showed predominantly Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (70.6%) in the isolates, Gram-positive cocci in 4.67% of isolates, and 2% polymicrobial. The most common organism isolated was Klebsiella pneumoniae (44.08%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (17.77%). K. pneumoniae showed maximum resistance to cefotaxime (98.51%) and most sensitivity to colistin (13.43%). Maximum resistance was seen against cefotaxime (97.08%) and least against moxifloxacin (37.96%) and colistin (13.08%). K. pneumoniae had the highest MDR (47.6%), followed by A. baumannii (17.14%). Conclusion: VAP is a significant cause of mortality in ICU settings. The significant isolation of GNB in ETAs and the resistance pattern seen in our study shows that judicious and appropriate use of antimicrobials in this setting would be highly beneficial to prevent the emergence of MDR organisms and reduce mortality in cases of VAP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"volume\":\"57 57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_179_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_179_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是导致发病率、死亡率、住院时间和医疗费用增加的重要原因。它是第二常见的医院获得性感染,具有高发病率和死亡率。VAP病原菌谱的鉴定是正确使用VAP抗菌剂和预防多药耐药(MDR)病原菌的必要条件。目的和目的:我们三级护理医院创伤中心导致VAP的微生物谱尚不清楚,此外,必须制定适当治疗这些病例的理想使用抗菌药物。本研究旨在确定该三级综合医院创伤重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者中引起VAP的细菌的微生物和抗菌药物敏感性模式。材料与方法:本研究纳入150例创伤ICU的VAP,符合临床肺部感染评分的VAP标准。采集气管内吸出液(ETA)标本,进行革兰氏染色;分离病原菌,采用Kirby-Bauer法进行药敏试验。采用SSPI 23.0.0.0进行统计分析。结果:分离株中以革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)为主(70.6%),革兰氏阳性球菌占4.67%,多微生物占2%。最常见的细菌是肺炎克雷伯菌(44.08%),其次是鲍曼不动杆菌(17.77%)。肺炎克雷伯菌对头孢噻肟耐药率最高(98.51%),对粘菌素最敏感(13.43%)。对头孢噻肟的耐药率最高(97.08%),对莫西沙星(37.96%)和粘菌素(13.08%)的耐药率最低。肺炎克雷伯菌耐多药率最高(47.6%),其次是鲍曼不动杆菌(17.14%)。结论:VAP是ICU患者死亡的重要原因。在我们的研究中发现的ETAs中GNB的显著分离和耐药模式表明,在这种情况下,明智和适当地使用抗菌剂将非常有利于防止耐多药微生物的出现,并降低VAP病例的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacteriological profile of ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital
Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important cause of increased morbidity, mortality, duration of hospital stay, and increased health-care costs. It is the second-most common hospital-acquired infection associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identification of the spectrum of causative organisms of VAP is imperative in the proper utilization of antimicrobials for VAP and the prevention of multidrug resistance (MDR) organisms. Aim and Objective: The spectrum of organisms responsible for VAP in the trauma center of our tertiary care hospital is not known and additionally, the ideal use of antimicrobials for proper treatment of these cases had to be formulated. This study was planned to identify the organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria causing VAP in patients admitted to trauma intensive care unit (ICU) of this tertiary care general hospital. Materials and Methods: In this study, 150 cases of VAP from a trauma ICU were included, who met the criteria of VAP as per the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) samples were collected and processed for Gram stain; organisms were isolated and antibiotic sensitivity was performed by Kirby–Bauer method. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPI 23.0.0.0. Results: Our study showed predominantly Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (70.6%) in the isolates, Gram-positive cocci in 4.67% of isolates, and 2% polymicrobial. The most common organism isolated was Klebsiella pneumoniae (44.08%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (17.77%). K. pneumoniae showed maximum resistance to cefotaxime (98.51%) and most sensitivity to colistin (13.43%). Maximum resistance was seen against cefotaxime (97.08%) and least against moxifloxacin (37.96%) and colistin (13.08%). K. pneumoniae had the highest MDR (47.6%), followed by A. baumannii (17.14%). Conclusion: VAP is a significant cause of mortality in ICU settings. The significant isolation of GNB in ETAs and the resistance pattern seen in our study shows that judicious and appropriate use of antimicrobials in this setting would be highly beneficial to prevent the emergence of MDR organisms and reduce mortality in cases of VAP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychological Morbidity of the COVID-19 Second Wave in Health-care Workers: A Cross-sectional Online Survey Adult Acne: Its Response to Therapy Sarcoidosis and Smoking: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Single Anesthesia ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Management of Common Bile Duct Stones Evolution and Innovations in Surgical Residency Education among Global Health Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1