卵圆孔未闭装置闭合的安全性和有效性:评价三级转诊中心的结果

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Research in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/rcm.rcm_16_23
Sedigheh Saedi, Maryam Favaedi, Maryam Danesh-Moghadam, Zahra Khajali, Ata Firouzi, Mozhgan Parsaee
{"title":"卵圆孔未闭装置闭合的安全性和有效性:评价三级转诊中心的结果","authors":"Sedigheh Saedi, Maryam Favaedi, Maryam Danesh-Moghadam, Zahra Khajali, Ata Firouzi, Mozhgan Parsaee","doi":"10.4103/rcm.rcm_16_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and Objectives: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale (PFO) device closure over medical therapy alone for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in carefully selected patients. In the current study, we sought to investigate the outcomes and complications of PFO device closure in our referral tertiary cardiovascular center. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 155 adult patients who underwent PFO device closure between 2006 and 2021 were included. Patient characteristics, recurrent neurologic events, and procedure-related complications were evaluated. Results: The follow-up period was 2.3 ± 1.2 years. The average age of the participants was 41.3 ± 10 years, and 59.4% were male. Six patients (3.9%) suffered recurrent cerebrovascular events in the follow-up. No procedure-related complications were reported in our study population. Two patients (1.3%) with recurrent stroke had developed newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). Conclusion: PFO device closure is a safe and effective method for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with no other detectable etiology. Patients, particularly those with cardiovascular risk factors, should be meticulously investigated for the asymptomatic episodes of AF as the contributing factor with prolonged Holter monitoring or use of loop recorders.","PeriodicalId":21031,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of patent foramen ovale device closure: Evaluation of outcomes in a tertiary referral center\",\"authors\":\"Sedigheh Saedi, Maryam Favaedi, Maryam Danesh-Moghadam, Zahra Khajali, Ata Firouzi, Mozhgan Parsaee\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/rcm.rcm_16_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim and Objectives: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale (PFO) device closure over medical therapy alone for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in carefully selected patients. In the current study, we sought to investigate the outcomes and complications of PFO device closure in our referral tertiary cardiovascular center. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 155 adult patients who underwent PFO device closure between 2006 and 2021 were included. Patient characteristics, recurrent neurologic events, and procedure-related complications were evaluated. Results: The follow-up period was 2.3 ± 1.2 years. The average age of the participants was 41.3 ± 10 years, and 59.4% were male. Six patients (3.9%) suffered recurrent cerebrovascular events in the follow-up. No procedure-related complications were reported in our study population. Two patients (1.3%) with recurrent stroke had developed newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). Conclusion: PFO device closure is a safe and effective method for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with no other detectable etiology. Patients, particularly those with cardiovascular risk factors, should be meticulously investigated for the asymptomatic episodes of AF as the contributing factor with prolonged Holter monitoring or use of loop recorders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_16_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_16_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目的:最近的随机对照试验表明,在精心挑选的患者中,卵圆孔未闭(PFO)装置闭合比单纯药物治疗更有利于隐源性卒中的二级预防。在目前的研究中,我们试图调查我们转诊的三级心血管中心PFO装置关闭的结果和并发症。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2006年至2021年间接受PFO装置闭合的155名成年患者。评估患者特征、复发性神经事件和手术相关并发症。结果:随访时间为2.3±1.2年。参与者的平均年龄为41.3±10岁,男性占59.4%。6例患者(3.9%)在随访中出现脑血管事件复发。在我们的研究人群中未报告手术相关并发症。2例复发性卒中患者(1.3%)出现新诊断的心房颤动(AF)。结论:PFO装置闭合是一种安全有效的预防无其他可检出病因的缺血性脑卒中复发的方法。患者,特别是那些有心血管危险因素的患者,应仔细调查无症状房颤发作,并延长动态心电图监测或使用循环记录仪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and efficacy of patent foramen ovale device closure: Evaluation of outcomes in a tertiary referral center
Aim and Objectives: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale (PFO) device closure over medical therapy alone for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in carefully selected patients. In the current study, we sought to investigate the outcomes and complications of PFO device closure in our referral tertiary cardiovascular center. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 155 adult patients who underwent PFO device closure between 2006 and 2021 were included. Patient characteristics, recurrent neurologic events, and procedure-related complications were evaluated. Results: The follow-up period was 2.3 ± 1.2 years. The average age of the participants was 41.3 ± 10 years, and 59.4% were male. Six patients (3.9%) suffered recurrent cerebrovascular events in the follow-up. No procedure-related complications were reported in our study population. Two patients (1.3%) with recurrent stroke had developed newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). Conclusion: PFO device closure is a safe and effective method for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with no other detectable etiology. Patients, particularly those with cardiovascular risk factors, should be meticulously investigated for the asymptomatic episodes of AF as the contributing factor with prolonged Holter monitoring or use of loop recorders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
An unusual presentation of a rare case of rhabdomyosarcoma of the left atrium as severe rheumatic mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation, fast ventricular rate, and left atrial failure Prognostic value of cardiac and noncardiac biomarkers in infective endocarditis: A prospective cross-sectional study Transcatheter closure of the aortopulmonary window with a multifunctional occluder device Predictions of adherence to treatment in patients referred to the heart failure clinic of Shahid Rajaee Hospital in Tehran The association between statin dosage and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for ischemic cardiomyopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1