代表的死胡同:苏珊娜·卡萨伊讨论罗杰·卡伊洛斯

IF 0.3 3区文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN Research in African Literatures Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.11

Hugo Salas

{"title":"代表的死胡同:苏珊娜·卡萨伊讨论罗杰·卡伊洛斯","authors":"Hugo Salas","doi":"10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: On account of her particular reading of surrealism, this essay contends that Suzanne Césaire’s intellectual production is best understood not as heralding later strains of thought (such as Glissant’s or ecocriticism), but as part of the diverse practices of critical theory contemporary to her. To support this thesis, this article studies the coincidences and differences between her ideas on the notion of mimicry and those of Roger Callois, leading to a more complex understanding of her cardinal notion of camouflage.","PeriodicalId":21021,"journal":{"name":"Research in African Literatures","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dead End of Representation: Suzanne Césaire Discusses Roger Caillois\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Salas\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT: On account of her particular reading of surrealism, this essay contends that Suzanne Césaire’s intellectual production is best understood not as heralding later strains of thought (such as Glissant’s or ecocriticism), but as part of the diverse practices of critical theory contemporary to her. To support this thesis, this article studies the coincidences and differences between her ideas on the notion of mimicry and those of Roger Callois, leading to a more complex understanding of her cardinal notion of camouflage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in African Literatures\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in African Literatures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.11\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in African Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.11","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:鉴于苏珊娜·卡萨伊对超现实主义的独特解读，本文认为她的思想创作并非预示着后来的思想流派(如格里桑特的或生态批评)，而是作为与她同时代的各种批评理论实践的一部分。为了支持这一论点，本文研究了她关于模仿概念的观点与罗杰·卡洛伊斯的观点之间的异同，从而对她的基本伪装概念有了更复杂的理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The Dead End of Representation: Suzanne Césaire Discusses Roger Caillois

ABSTRACT: On account of her particular reading of surrealism, this essay contends that Suzanne Césaire’s intellectual production is best understood not as heralding later strains of thought (such as Glissant’s or ecocriticism), but as part of the diverse practices of critical theory contemporary to her. To support this thesis, this article studies the coincidences and differences between her ideas on the notion of mimicry and those of Roger Callois, leading to a more complex understanding of her cardinal notion of camouflage.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Research in African Literatures LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1970, Research in African Literatures is the premier journal of African literary studies worldwide and provides a forum in English for research on the oral and written literatures of Africa, as well as information on African publishing, announcements of importance to Africanists, and notes and queries of literary interest. Reviews of current scholarly books are included in every issue, often presented as review essays, and a forum offers readers the opportunity to respond to issues raised in articles and book reviews.