{"title":"高超声速国际飞行研究实验飞行2未启动可靠性分析","authors":"Thomas K. West, Michael D. Bynum","doi":"10.2514/1.b39108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this work was to assess the unstart reliability of the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 system. To do this, a quantification of margins and uncertainties framework was used for comparing the predicted combustion-induced shock location to the predicted last stable shock location within the isolator. Uncertainty sources included parametric uncertainty in the flight conditions, the heat release model, and turbulence modeling, as well as model verification errors. Additionally, an estimate of the model-form uncertainty was established by comparing the model to measured ground-test data. A computationally efficient nonintrusive polynomial chaos approach was used to propagate parametric uncertainty through the computational fluids dynamics models of both the ground-test configuration and the flight vehicle. Compared to direct-connect ground-test data, computational fluid dynamics predictions yielded about two duct heights of model-form uncertainty. This was applied to a prediction of the flight vehicle unstart margin at the Mach 6.5 flight condition. Building up all of the computational model uncertainty (including parametric uncertainty, verification errors, and the determined model-form uncertainty), the 95%-probability-level-based confidence ratio, which is a ratio of a statistical margin measure to the total uncertainty, was found to be 0.31 for the flight system.","PeriodicalId":16903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 Unstart Reliability Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Thomas K. West, Michael D. Bynum\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/1.b39108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this work was to assess the unstart reliability of the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 system. To do this, a quantification of margins and uncertainties framework was used for comparing the predicted combustion-induced shock location to the predicted last stable shock location within the isolator. Uncertainty sources included parametric uncertainty in the flight conditions, the heat release model, and turbulence modeling, as well as model verification errors. Additionally, an estimate of the model-form uncertainty was established by comparing the model to measured ground-test data. A computationally efficient nonintrusive polynomial chaos approach was used to propagate parametric uncertainty through the computational fluids dynamics models of both the ground-test configuration and the flight vehicle. Compared to direct-connect ground-test data, computational fluid dynamics predictions yielded about two duct heights of model-form uncertainty. This was applied to a prediction of the flight vehicle unstart margin at the Mach 6.5 flight condition. Building up all of the computational model uncertainty (including parametric uncertainty, verification errors, and the determined model-form uncertainty), the 95%-probability-level-based confidence ratio, which is a ratio of a statistical margin measure to the total uncertainty, was found to be 0.31 for the flight system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Propulsion and Power\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Propulsion and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b39108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b39108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 Unstart Reliability Analysis
The objective of this work was to assess the unstart reliability of the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 system. To do this, a quantification of margins and uncertainties framework was used for comparing the predicted combustion-induced shock location to the predicted last stable shock location within the isolator. Uncertainty sources included parametric uncertainty in the flight conditions, the heat release model, and turbulence modeling, as well as model verification errors. Additionally, an estimate of the model-form uncertainty was established by comparing the model to measured ground-test data. A computationally efficient nonintrusive polynomial chaos approach was used to propagate parametric uncertainty through the computational fluids dynamics models of both the ground-test configuration and the flight vehicle. Compared to direct-connect ground-test data, computational fluid dynamics predictions yielded about two duct heights of model-form uncertainty. This was applied to a prediction of the flight vehicle unstart margin at the Mach 6.5 flight condition. Building up all of the computational model uncertainty (including parametric uncertainty, verification errors, and the determined model-form uncertainty), the 95%-probability-level-based confidence ratio, which is a ratio of a statistical margin measure to the total uncertainty, was found to be 0.31 for the flight system.
期刊介绍:
This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of aerospace propulsion and power through the dissemination of original archival papers contributing to advancements in airbreathing, electric, and advanced propulsion; solid and liquid rockets; fuels and propellants; power generation and conversion for aerospace vehicles; and the application of aerospace science and technology to terrestrial energy devices and systems. It is intended to provide readers of the Journal, with primary interests in propulsion and power, access to papers spanning the range from research through development to applications. Papers in these disciplines and the sciences of combustion, fluid mechanics, and solid mechanics as directly related to propulsion and power are solicited.