高超声速国际飞行研究实验飞行2未启动可靠性分析

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Journal of Propulsion and Power Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.2514/1.b39108
Thomas K. West, Michael D. Bynum
{"title":"高超声速国际飞行研究实验飞行2未启动可靠性分析","authors":"Thomas K. West, Michael D. Bynum","doi":"10.2514/1.b39108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this work was to assess the unstart reliability of the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 system. To do this, a quantification of margins and uncertainties framework was used for comparing the predicted combustion-induced shock location to the predicted last stable shock location within the isolator. Uncertainty sources included parametric uncertainty in the flight conditions, the heat release model, and turbulence modeling, as well as model verification errors. Additionally, an estimate of the model-form uncertainty was established by comparing the model to measured ground-test data. A computationally efficient nonintrusive polynomial chaos approach was used to propagate parametric uncertainty through the computational fluids dynamics models of both the ground-test configuration and the flight vehicle. Compared to direct-connect ground-test data, computational fluid dynamics predictions yielded about two duct heights of model-form uncertainty. This was applied to a prediction of the flight vehicle unstart margin at the Mach 6.5 flight condition. Building up all of the computational model uncertainty (including parametric uncertainty, verification errors, and the determined model-form uncertainty), the 95%-probability-level-based confidence ratio, which is a ratio of a statistical margin measure to the total uncertainty, was found to be 0.31 for the flight system.","PeriodicalId":16903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 Unstart Reliability Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Thomas K. West, Michael D. Bynum\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/1.b39108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this work was to assess the unstart reliability of the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 system. To do this, a quantification of margins and uncertainties framework was used for comparing the predicted combustion-induced shock location to the predicted last stable shock location within the isolator. Uncertainty sources included parametric uncertainty in the flight conditions, the heat release model, and turbulence modeling, as well as model verification errors. Additionally, an estimate of the model-form uncertainty was established by comparing the model to measured ground-test data. A computationally efficient nonintrusive polynomial chaos approach was used to propagate parametric uncertainty through the computational fluids dynamics models of both the ground-test configuration and the flight vehicle. Compared to direct-connect ground-test data, computational fluid dynamics predictions yielded about two duct heights of model-form uncertainty. This was applied to a prediction of the flight vehicle unstart margin at the Mach 6.5 flight condition. Building up all of the computational model uncertainty (including parametric uncertainty, verification errors, and the determined model-form uncertainty), the 95%-probability-level-based confidence ratio, which is a ratio of a statistical margin measure to the total uncertainty, was found to be 0.31 for the flight system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Propulsion and Power\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Propulsion and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b39108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b39108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是评估高超音速国际飞行研究实验飞行2系统的未启动可靠性。为了做到这一点,使用了一个量化的余量和不确定性框架来比较预测的燃烧引起的冲击位置和预测的隔离器内最后稳定的冲击位置。不确定性来源包括飞行条件、热释放模型和湍流建模中的参数不确定性,以及模型验证误差。此外,通过将模型与实测地面试验数据进行比较,建立了模型形式不确定性的估计。采用一种计算效率高的非侵入式多项式混沌方法,在地面试验构型和飞行器的计算流体动力学模型中传播参数不确定性。与直接连接地面试验数据相比,计算流体动力学预测产生了大约两个管道高度的模型形式不确定性。这被应用于飞行器在6.5马赫飞行条件下未启动裕度的预测。建立所有计算模型的不确定性(包括参数不确定性、验证误差和确定的模型形式不确定性),基于95%概率水平的置信比,即统计裕度度量与总不确定性的比率,发现飞行系统为0.31。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 Unstart Reliability Analysis
The objective of this work was to assess the unstart reliability of the Hypersonic International Flight Research Experimentation Flight 2 system. To do this, a quantification of margins and uncertainties framework was used for comparing the predicted combustion-induced shock location to the predicted last stable shock location within the isolator. Uncertainty sources included parametric uncertainty in the flight conditions, the heat release model, and turbulence modeling, as well as model verification errors. Additionally, an estimate of the model-form uncertainty was established by comparing the model to measured ground-test data. A computationally efficient nonintrusive polynomial chaos approach was used to propagate parametric uncertainty through the computational fluids dynamics models of both the ground-test configuration and the flight vehicle. Compared to direct-connect ground-test data, computational fluid dynamics predictions yielded about two duct heights of model-form uncertainty. This was applied to a prediction of the flight vehicle unstart margin at the Mach 6.5 flight condition. Building up all of the computational model uncertainty (including parametric uncertainty, verification errors, and the determined model-form uncertainty), the 95%-probability-level-based confidence ratio, which is a ratio of a statistical margin measure to the total uncertainty, was found to be 0.31 for the flight system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Journal of Propulsion and Power 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of aerospace propulsion and power through the dissemination of original archival papers contributing to advancements in airbreathing, electric, and advanced propulsion; solid and liquid rockets; fuels and propellants; power generation and conversion for aerospace vehicles; and the application of aerospace science and technology to terrestrial energy devices and systems. It is intended to provide readers of the Journal, with primary interests in propulsion and power, access to papers spanning the range from research through development to applications. Papers in these disciplines and the sciences of combustion, fluid mechanics, and solid mechanics as directly related to propulsion and power are solicited.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Future Low-Emissions Combustor Technology on Acoustic Scaling Laws Experimental Investigation on Atomization of JP-10 Slurry Jets Containing Boron Nanoparticles Fuel Temperature Effects on Combustion Stability of a High-Pressure Liquid-Fueled Swirl Flame Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle Application of Boundary Layer Combustion in High-Mach-Number Scramjets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1