进入加拿大社会住房计划的障碍

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES HOUSING STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/02673037.2023.2266396
Erin Dej, John Ecker, Natasha Martino
{"title":"进入加拿大社会住房计划的障碍","authors":"Erin Dej, John Ecker, Natasha Martino","doi":"10.1080/02673037.2023.2266396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe right to housing is enshrined in Canadian law, however, access to housing can be limited by administrative requirements. This is particularly true for people experiencing homelessness and/or insecure housing, as they may not have access to documentation, such as identification or notice of assessments (i.e. income tax verification). The current research examines program eligibility and documentation requirements for access to social housing across Canada. Sixty-seven communities that receive funding from Canada’s federal government were examined via Internet-based searches. Eligibility requirements were grouped into five main categories: (1) Citizenship; (2) Finances; (3) Support needs; (4) Housing history; and (5) Legal history. Similarly, documentation requirements were grouped into four main categories: (1) Identification and Citizenship; (2) Finances; (3) Housing history; and (4) Personal circumstances. The results demonstrate the complexities in applying and being approved for social housing in Canada. The potentially onerous eligibility and documentation requirements may limit access to social housing for those who are most in need. Policy and program recommendations are discussed to improve access to social housing in Canada.Keywords: Social housingadministrative barriershomelessnesssocial policy Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Table 1. Prevalence index of program requirements.Download CSVDisplay TableNotes1 Data coming from communities Point in Time counts reveal that unsheltered homelessness increased significantly in 2021, during the pandemic, compared to the previous 2018 count. See, for example, Dufferin County (Citation2021) 2021 Point-in-Time Count Results Report; Flow Community Projects (Citation2021) Regina Homelessness Count; Niagara Region (Citation2021) Niagara Counts Results 2021; Homelessness Services Association of BC (Citation2021) 2020/21 Report on Homeless Counts in B.C.; Brantford-Brant (Citation2021) 2021 Point-in-Time Count Report.2 Of course, particular people and groups continue to be denied these rights both formally and substantively. For example, newcomers who do not hold citizenship status are ineligible for many social rights, and First Nations People living on reserves are regularly denied equal access to health, education, and housing resources, as evidenced through the ongoing legal challenges to actualize Jordan’s Principle (Blackstock, Citation2016).Additional informationNotes on contributorsErin DejErin Dej, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Criminology at Wilfrid Laurier University. She studies and advocates against the social exclusion of unhoused people, including the criminalization of homelessness. She is the author of A Complex Exile: Homelessness and Social Exclusion in Canada, with UBC Press.John EckerJohn Ecker, PhD, is a Research Manager at MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, and the Director of Research & Evaluation at the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, York University.Natasha MartinoNatasha Martino is a PhD candidate in the department of Sociology at McMaster University. Her exploratory research examined the role of bylaw enforcement and municipal ordinances in the social control and management of homelessness and homeless encampments across Ontario.","PeriodicalId":48138,"journal":{"name":"HOUSING STUDIES","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to accessing social housing programs in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Erin Dej, John Ecker, Natasha Martino\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02673037.2023.2266396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe right to housing is enshrined in Canadian law, however, access to housing can be limited by administrative requirements. This is particularly true for people experiencing homelessness and/or insecure housing, as they may not have access to documentation, such as identification or notice of assessments (i.e. income tax verification). The current research examines program eligibility and documentation requirements for access to social housing across Canada. Sixty-seven communities that receive funding from Canada’s federal government were examined via Internet-based searches. Eligibility requirements were grouped into five main categories: (1) Citizenship; (2) Finances; (3) Support needs; (4) Housing history; and (5) Legal history. Similarly, documentation requirements were grouped into four main categories: (1) Identification and Citizenship; (2) Finances; (3) Housing history; and (4) Personal circumstances. The results demonstrate the complexities in applying and being approved for social housing in Canada. The potentially onerous eligibility and documentation requirements may limit access to social housing for those who are most in need. Policy and program recommendations are discussed to improve access to social housing in Canada.Keywords: Social housingadministrative barriershomelessnesssocial policy Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Table 1. Prevalence index of program requirements.Download CSVDisplay TableNotes1 Data coming from communities Point in Time counts reveal that unsheltered homelessness increased significantly in 2021, during the pandemic, compared to the previous 2018 count. See, for example, Dufferin County (Citation2021) 2021 Point-in-Time Count Results Report; Flow Community Projects (Citation2021) Regina Homelessness Count; Niagara Region (Citation2021) Niagara Counts Results 2021; Homelessness Services Association of BC (Citation2021) 2020/21 Report on Homeless Counts in B.C.; Brantford-Brant (Citation2021) 2021 Point-in-Time Count Report.2 Of course, particular people and groups continue to be denied these rights both formally and substantively. For example, newcomers who do not hold citizenship status are ineligible for many social rights, and First Nations People living on reserves are regularly denied equal access to health, education, and housing resources, as evidenced through the ongoing legal challenges to actualize Jordan’s Principle (Blackstock, Citation2016).Additional informationNotes on contributorsErin DejErin Dej, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Criminology at Wilfrid Laurier University. She studies and advocates against the social exclusion of unhoused people, including the criminalization of homelessness. She is the author of A Complex Exile: Homelessness and Social Exclusion in Canada, with UBC Press.John EckerJohn Ecker, PhD, is a Research Manager at MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, and the Director of Research & Evaluation at the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, York University.Natasha MartinoNatasha Martino is a PhD candidate in the department of Sociology at McMaster University. Her exploratory research examined the role of bylaw enforcement and municipal ordinances in the social control and management of homelessness and homeless encampments across Ontario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOUSING STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOUSING STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2266396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOUSING STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2023.2266396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】住房权是加拿大法律明文规定的权利,然而,住房权的获得可能受到行政要求的限制。对于无家可归和/或住房不安全的人来说尤其如此,因为他们可能无法获得证件,例如身份证明或评估通知(即所得税核查)。目前的研究检查了加拿大各地获得社会住房的项目资格和文件要求。67个接受加拿大联邦政府资助的社区通过互联网搜索进行了调查。资格要求分为五个主要类别:(1)公民身份;(2)财务状况;(3)支持需求;(4)居住历史;(5)法律史。同样,文件要求分为四大类:(1)身份和公民身份;(2)财务状况;(3)居住历史;(四)个人情况。结果显示了加拿大社会住房申请和被批准的复杂性。潜在的繁重资格和文件要求可能会限制那些最需要的人获得社会住房。讨论了改善加拿大社会住房的政策和方案建议。关键词:社会住房;行政障碍;无家可归者;社会政策;表1。项目需求的流行指数。来自社区的数据按时间点统计显示,与2018年的统计相比,2021年大流行期间无庇护的无家可归者人数显著增加。例如,参见Dufferin County (Citation2021) 2021年时间点计数结果报告;流动社区项目(Citation2021)里贾纳无家可归者统计;尼亚加拉地区(Citation2021);BC省无家可归者服务协会(Citation2021) 2020/21年BC省无家可归者统计报告;当然,某些人和群体继续在形式上和实质上被剥夺这些权利。例如,没有公民身份的新移民没有资格享有许多社会权利,居住在保留地的第一民族经常被剥夺平等获得卫生、教育和住房资源的机会,这一点从实施约旦原则的持续法律挑战中得到了证明(Blackstock, Citation2016)。作者简介:serin DejErin Dej,博士,Wilfrid Laurier大学犯罪学系副教授。她研究并倡导反对对无家可归者的社会排斥,包括将无家可归者定为刑事犯罪。她是《复杂的流亡:加拿大的无家可归和社会排斥》一书的作者,由UBC出版社出版。John Ecker,博士,多伦多统一健康中心MAP城市卫生解决方案研究经理,约克大学加拿大无家可归观察研究与评估主任。Natasha Martino是麦克马斯特大学社会学系的博士候选人。她的探索性研究考察了执法和市政条例在安大略省无家可归者和无家可归者营地的社会控制和管理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to accessing social housing programs in Canada
AbstractThe right to housing is enshrined in Canadian law, however, access to housing can be limited by administrative requirements. This is particularly true for people experiencing homelessness and/or insecure housing, as they may not have access to documentation, such as identification or notice of assessments (i.e. income tax verification). The current research examines program eligibility and documentation requirements for access to social housing across Canada. Sixty-seven communities that receive funding from Canada’s federal government were examined via Internet-based searches. Eligibility requirements were grouped into five main categories: (1) Citizenship; (2) Finances; (3) Support needs; (4) Housing history; and (5) Legal history. Similarly, documentation requirements were grouped into four main categories: (1) Identification and Citizenship; (2) Finances; (3) Housing history; and (4) Personal circumstances. The results demonstrate the complexities in applying and being approved for social housing in Canada. The potentially onerous eligibility and documentation requirements may limit access to social housing for those who are most in need. Policy and program recommendations are discussed to improve access to social housing in Canada.Keywords: Social housingadministrative barriershomelessnesssocial policy Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Table 1. Prevalence index of program requirements.Download CSVDisplay TableNotes1 Data coming from communities Point in Time counts reveal that unsheltered homelessness increased significantly in 2021, during the pandemic, compared to the previous 2018 count. See, for example, Dufferin County (Citation2021) 2021 Point-in-Time Count Results Report; Flow Community Projects (Citation2021) Regina Homelessness Count; Niagara Region (Citation2021) Niagara Counts Results 2021; Homelessness Services Association of BC (Citation2021) 2020/21 Report on Homeless Counts in B.C.; Brantford-Brant (Citation2021) 2021 Point-in-Time Count Report.2 Of course, particular people and groups continue to be denied these rights both formally and substantively. For example, newcomers who do not hold citizenship status are ineligible for many social rights, and First Nations People living on reserves are regularly denied equal access to health, education, and housing resources, as evidenced through the ongoing legal challenges to actualize Jordan’s Principle (Blackstock, Citation2016).Additional informationNotes on contributorsErin DejErin Dej, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Criminology at Wilfrid Laurier University. She studies and advocates against the social exclusion of unhoused people, including the criminalization of homelessness. She is the author of A Complex Exile: Homelessness and Social Exclusion in Canada, with UBC Press.John EckerJohn Ecker, PhD, is a Research Manager at MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, and the Director of Research & Evaluation at the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, York University.Natasha MartinoNatasha Martino is a PhD candidate in the department of Sociology at McMaster University. Her exploratory research examined the role of bylaw enforcement and municipal ordinances in the social control and management of homelessness and homeless encampments across Ontario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HOUSING STUDIES
HOUSING STUDIES Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.80%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Housing Studies is the essential international forum for academic debate in the housing field. Since its establishment in 1986, Housing Studies has become the leading housing journal and has played a major role in theoretical and analytical developments within this area of study. The journal has explored a range of academic and policy concerns including the following: •linkages between housing and other areas of social and economic policy •the role of housing in everyday life and in gender, class and age relationships •the economics of housing expenditure and housing finance •international comparisons and developments •issues of sustainability and housing development
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneities in willingness to pay for circular affordable housing: insight from young users Unlocking housing wealth through mortgage debt: do patterns and motivations vary by age? Social mix and social interaction: evidence from Los Angeles County The state house prices make: the political elasticities of house prices and rents Migrant residential mobility and tenure transitions within different housing regimes: evidence from three Nordic capital cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1