精神分裂症扩展书面语篇的衔接与连贯分析:一个探索性案例研究

Q2 Arts and Humanities rEFLections Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.61508/refl.v30i2.265574
Richard Watson Todd
{"title":"精神分裂症扩展书面语篇的衔接与连贯分析:一个探索性案例研究","authors":"Richard Watson Todd","doi":"10.61508/refl.v30i2.265574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schizophrenic discourse is characterized by thought disorder, or a lack of coherence, prompting substantial research into identifying and measuring the incoherent discourse of schizophrenics. Much of this research has examined short extracts of elicited spoken data and used researcher judgments. This study examines the connectedness of naturally-occurring extensive written schizophrenic discourse using three methods of analysis: an automated analysis of cohesion, lexical cohesion analysis, and topic-based analysis focusing on propositional coherence. The results show that the schizophrenic texts are highly cohesive, especially in their use of connectives and the density of connections. The texts also show high proportions of topic shifts and a greater average distance of moves between concepts. These suggest that the topic structure of the schizophrenic texts consists predominantly of repetitive topic maintenance interspersed with short unrelated mini-topics, and it is this structure that manifests thought disorder.","PeriodicalId":36332,"journal":{"name":"rEFLections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cohesion and Coherence Analyses of Extended Written Schizophrenic Discourse: An Exploratory Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Richard Watson Todd\",\"doi\":\"10.61508/refl.v30i2.265574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Schizophrenic discourse is characterized by thought disorder, or a lack of coherence, prompting substantial research into identifying and measuring the incoherent discourse of schizophrenics. Much of this research has examined short extracts of elicited spoken data and used researcher judgments. This study examines the connectedness of naturally-occurring extensive written schizophrenic discourse using three methods of analysis: an automated analysis of cohesion, lexical cohesion analysis, and topic-based analysis focusing on propositional coherence. The results show that the schizophrenic texts are highly cohesive, especially in their use of connectives and the density of connections. The texts also show high proportions of topic shifts and a greater average distance of moves between concepts. These suggest that the topic structure of the schizophrenic texts consists predominantly of repetitive topic maintenance interspersed with short unrelated mini-topics, and it is this structure that manifests thought disorder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"rEFLections\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"rEFLections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i2.265574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"rEFLections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i2.265574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神分裂症患者的话语以思维障碍或缺乏连贯性为特征,这促使人们对识别和测量精神分裂症患者的不连贯话语进行了大量研究。这项研究的大部分都是对口头数据的简短摘录和研究者的判断进行检验。本研究使用三种分析方法考察自然发生的大量书面精神分裂症语篇的连通性:自动衔接分析、词汇衔接分析和基于主题的命题连贯分析。结果表明,精神分裂症文本具有高度的衔接性,特别是在连接词的使用和连接密度方面。文本也显示出高比例的话题转移和更大的平均移动距离之间的概念。这些结果表明,精神分裂症文本的主题结构主要由重复的主题维持组成,其间穿插着不相关的小主题,而这种结构正是思维障碍的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cohesion and Coherence Analyses of Extended Written Schizophrenic Discourse: An Exploratory Case Study
Schizophrenic discourse is characterized by thought disorder, or a lack of coherence, prompting substantial research into identifying and measuring the incoherent discourse of schizophrenics. Much of this research has examined short extracts of elicited spoken data and used researcher judgments. This study examines the connectedness of naturally-occurring extensive written schizophrenic discourse using three methods of analysis: an automated analysis of cohesion, lexical cohesion analysis, and topic-based analysis focusing on propositional coherence. The results show that the schizophrenic texts are highly cohesive, especially in their use of connectives and the density of connections. The texts also show high proportions of topic shifts and a greater average distance of moves between concepts. These suggest that the topic structure of the schizophrenic texts consists predominantly of repetitive topic maintenance interspersed with short unrelated mini-topics, and it is this structure that manifests thought disorder.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
rEFLections
rEFLections Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verb Error Analysis of Thai EFL Generation Z and Generation Alpha Students in Thailand English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education A Bibliometric Analysis of Keywords of HyFlex Learning for the English Language Learning Skills of Teacher Students Vlogging: An Alternative to Role-play in Improving EFL Learners' Conversation Skills English for Business Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1