{"title":"定制化学-机械处理再生骨料的实验与分析性能","authors":"Babu Lal Chauhan, Gyani Jail Singh","doi":"10.3151/jact.21.903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experimental and analytical performance of untreated recycled aggregates (URA), chemically treated recycled aggregates (ARA), and customized chemical-mechanically processed recycled aggregates (AmRA). The compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of concrete consisting of AmRA (AmRC) are greater than those composed by URA (URC) by 33.88%, 5.87%, 55.07%, 28.84%, and 50.80%, and those of ARA (ARC) by 10.89%, 21.41%, 29.44%, 55.33%, and 34.48%, respectively. AmRC has abrasion resistance around 52.03% and 43.07% higher than URC and ARC. Chemical treatment reduces porosity and microcracks in mortar adhered to aggregate. As a result of the customized mechanical treatment, the surface characteristics are highly uniform and dense. The high-quality surface texture, reduced porosity, and microcracks in the mortar adhering to the AmRA significantly strengthen interfacial transitions zones. Thus, AmRC achieves physical, mechanical, and durability properties close to or superior to natural aggregate (NA) concrete (NAC). Moreover, there is a strong correlation between compressive strength and split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of AmRC with URC and ARC. The most interesting observation of the present research is the equivalency in sorptivity of AmRC and NAC. The present study uses the URA produced by crushing concrete cubes in the laboratory.","PeriodicalId":14868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and Analytical Performance of Recycled Aggregates Produced by Customized Chemical-Mechanical Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Babu Lal Chauhan, Gyani Jail Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.3151/jact.21.903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experimental and analytical performance of untreated recycled aggregates (URA), chemically treated recycled aggregates (ARA), and customized chemical-mechanically processed recycled aggregates (AmRA). The compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of concrete consisting of AmRA (AmRC) are greater than those composed by URA (URC) by 33.88%, 5.87%, 55.07%, 28.84%, and 50.80%, and those of ARA (ARC) by 10.89%, 21.41%, 29.44%, 55.33%, and 34.48%, respectively. AmRC has abrasion resistance around 52.03% and 43.07% higher than URC and ARC. Chemical treatment reduces porosity and microcracks in mortar adhered to aggregate. As a result of the customized mechanical treatment, the surface characteristics are highly uniform and dense. The high-quality surface texture, reduced porosity, and microcracks in the mortar adhering to the AmRA significantly strengthen interfacial transitions zones. Thus, AmRC achieves physical, mechanical, and durability properties close to or superior to natural aggregate (NA) concrete (NAC). Moreover, there is a strong correlation between compressive strength and split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of AmRC with URC and ARC. The most interesting observation of the present research is the equivalency in sorptivity of AmRC and NAC. The present study uses the URA produced by crushing concrete cubes in the laboratory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.21.903\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.21.903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental and Analytical Performance of Recycled Aggregates Produced by Customized Chemical-Mechanical Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experimental and analytical performance of untreated recycled aggregates (URA), chemically treated recycled aggregates (ARA), and customized chemical-mechanically processed recycled aggregates (AmRA). The compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of concrete consisting of AmRA (AmRC) are greater than those composed by URA (URC) by 33.88%, 5.87%, 55.07%, 28.84%, and 50.80%, and those of ARA (ARC) by 10.89%, 21.41%, 29.44%, 55.33%, and 34.48%, respectively. AmRC has abrasion resistance around 52.03% and 43.07% higher than URC and ARC. Chemical treatment reduces porosity and microcracks in mortar adhered to aggregate. As a result of the customized mechanical treatment, the surface characteristics are highly uniform and dense. The high-quality surface texture, reduced porosity, and microcracks in the mortar adhering to the AmRA significantly strengthen interfacial transitions zones. Thus, AmRC achieves physical, mechanical, and durability properties close to or superior to natural aggregate (NA) concrete (NAC). Moreover, there is a strong correlation between compressive strength and split tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture energy, and modulus of elasticity of AmRC with URC and ARC. The most interesting observation of the present research is the equivalency in sorptivity of AmRC and NAC. The present study uses the URA produced by crushing concrete cubes in the laboratory.
期刊介绍:
JACT is fast. Only 5 to 7 months from submission to publishing thanks to electronic file exchange between you, the reviewers and the editors.
JACT is high quality. Peer-reviewed by internationally renowned experts who return review comments to ensure the highest possible quality.
JACT is transparent. The status of your manuscript from submission to publishing can be viewed on our website, greatly reducing the frustration of being kept in the dark, possibly for over a year in the case of some journals.
JACT is cost-effective. Submission and subscription are free of charge . Full-text PDF files are available for the authors to open at their web sites.
Scope:
*Materials:
-Material properties
-Fresh concrete
-Hardened concrete
-High performance concrete
-Development of new materials
-Fiber reinforcement
*Maintenance and Rehabilitation:
-Durability and repair
-Strengthening/Rehabilitation
-LCC for concrete structures
-Environmant conscious materials
*Structures:
-Design and construction of RC and PC Structures
-Seismic design
-Safety against environmental disasters
-Failure mechanism and non-linear analysis/modeling
-Composite and mixed structures
*Other:
-Monitoring
-Aesthetics of concrete structures
-Other concrete related topics