将儿童早期发展干预措施纳入西亚亚县卫生设施环境的可行性和可接受性:一项定性研究的结果

Silas Onyango, Patricia Kitsao-Wekulo, Kenneth Okelo, Margaret Nampijja, Beatrice Oyugi, Christopher Obongo, Dickens Omedo, Debjeet Sen, Elizabeth Kimani-Murage
{"title":"将儿童早期发展干预措施纳入西亚亚县卫生设施环境的可行性和可接受性:一项定性研究的结果","authors":"Silas Onyango, Patricia Kitsao-Wekulo, Kenneth Okelo, Margaret Nampijja, Beatrice Oyugi, Christopher Obongo, Dickens Omedo, Debjeet Sen, Elizabeth Kimani-Murage","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3347606/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background This paper explores the perceptions and experiences of stakeholders to understand the feasibility and acceptability of integrating early childhood development (ECD) intervention into the health system. Method Data were derived from an endline qualitative survey, which was part of a larger ECD study conducted in Siaya County, Kenya. Purposive sampling was used to select participants for the qualitative interviews. We conducted KIIs, focus group discussions (FGDs), and in-depth interviews (IDIs). Analyses were organized according to the preselected thematic areas. Result Political goodwill, proper coordination and support, and good linkages between the community and the health facility facilitated the implementation despite the challenges of a shortage of personnel and staff transfers. Integration of ECD intervention into the health system seems feasible in terms of its performance, service provision, information provided, and efficiency. In addition, stakeholders willingly supported the implementation of the intervention at different levels and capacities, which led to perceived acceptability. Furthermore, there was general satisfaction with the implementation due to perceived benefits that could potentially improve children’s developmental outcomes. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating ECD interventions into the health system. Future interventions integrating ECD messages into nutrition and health programs can leverage key drivers identified through this study for smooth and effective integration.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and acceptability of integrating an early childhood development intervention into the health-facility setting in Siaya County: findings of a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Silas Onyango, Patricia Kitsao-Wekulo, Kenneth Okelo, Margaret Nampijja, Beatrice Oyugi, Christopher Obongo, Dickens Omedo, Debjeet Sen, Elizabeth Kimani-Murage\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3347606/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background This paper explores the perceptions and experiences of stakeholders to understand the feasibility and acceptability of integrating early childhood development (ECD) intervention into the health system. Method Data were derived from an endline qualitative survey, which was part of a larger ECD study conducted in Siaya County, Kenya. Purposive sampling was used to select participants for the qualitative interviews. We conducted KIIs, focus group discussions (FGDs), and in-depth interviews (IDIs). Analyses were organized according to the preselected thematic areas. Result Political goodwill, proper coordination and support, and good linkages between the community and the health facility facilitated the implementation despite the challenges of a shortage of personnel and staff transfers. Integration of ECD intervention into the health system seems feasible in terms of its performance, service provision, information provided, and efficiency. In addition, stakeholders willingly supported the implementation of the intervention at different levels and capacities, which led to perceived acceptability. Furthermore, there was general satisfaction with the implementation due to perceived benefits that could potentially improve children’s developmental outcomes. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating ECD interventions into the health system. Future interventions integrating ECD messages into nutrition and health programs can leverage key drivers identified through this study for smooth and effective integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3347606/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3347606/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景本文探讨了利益相关者的看法和经验,以了解将儿童早期发展(ECD)干预纳入卫生系统的可行性和可接受性。数据来源于一项终端定性调查,该调查是在肯尼亚Siaya县进行的一项更大规模的ECD研究的一部分。定性访谈采用有目的抽样的方法进行。我们进行了kii、焦点小组讨论(fgd)和深度访谈(IDIs)。根据预先选定的专题领域组织了分析。结果:尽管面临人员短缺和工作人员调动的挑战,但政治善意、适当的协调和支持以及社区与保健设施之间的良好联系促进了执行工作。从其绩效、服务提供、信息提供和效率来看,将幼儿发展干预纳入卫生系统似乎是可行的。此外,利益相关者愿意支持不同层次和能力的干预措施的实施,这导致了感知的可接受性。此外,由于可能潜在地改善儿童的发展结果,人们普遍对实施感到满意。结论本研究证明了将幼儿发展干预措施纳入卫生系统的可行性。将幼儿发展信息纳入营养和健康规划的未来干预措施可以利用本研究确定的关键驱动因素,实现顺利有效的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility and acceptability of integrating an early childhood development intervention into the health-facility setting in Siaya County: findings of a qualitative study
Abstract Background This paper explores the perceptions and experiences of stakeholders to understand the feasibility and acceptability of integrating early childhood development (ECD) intervention into the health system. Method Data were derived from an endline qualitative survey, which was part of a larger ECD study conducted in Siaya County, Kenya. Purposive sampling was used to select participants for the qualitative interviews. We conducted KIIs, focus group discussions (FGDs), and in-depth interviews (IDIs). Analyses were organized according to the preselected thematic areas. Result Political goodwill, proper coordination and support, and good linkages between the community and the health facility facilitated the implementation despite the challenges of a shortage of personnel and staff transfers. Integration of ECD intervention into the health system seems feasible in terms of its performance, service provision, information provided, and efficiency. In addition, stakeholders willingly supported the implementation of the intervention at different levels and capacities, which led to perceived acceptability. Furthermore, there was general satisfaction with the implementation due to perceived benefits that could potentially improve children’s developmental outcomes. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating ECD interventions into the health system. Future interventions integrating ECD messages into nutrition and health programs can leverage key drivers identified through this study for smooth and effective integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Event Reduction in Localization of DES Supervisory Control Semantic Relational Extraction via Learning Syntactic Structural Representation Vehicle Tracking System using Sensor Fusion with Signal Loss Compensation Automotive Tracking System with Signal Lost Compensation Bridging the Gap: Assessing the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare for Improved Efficiency and Doctor Adaptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1