高、低水平英语学习者计划使用母语汉语或二语英语对口语表现的影响

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1186/s40862-023-00210-8
Yingsheng Liu, Pui-sze Yeung
{"title":"高、低水平英语学习者计划使用母语汉语或二语英语对口语表现的影响","authors":"Yingsheng Liu, Pui-sze Yeung","doi":"10.1186/s40862-023-00210-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Speaking constitutes one of the main goals of learning a second language (L2). Despite the increasing attention on the role of planning and language transfer in L2 learning, the combined effect of using different languages and pre-task planning on language production remains unclear. This study investigated whether the use of different languages in planning affects speaking performance and whether the effect differs by language proficiency. A total of 84 students in Chinese universities learning English as a foreign language participated in several speaking tasks after planning using their first language (L1) Chinese or L2 English. Findings showed that using L1 in planning results in significantly higher syntactic complexity, accuracy, and fluency in speaking performance than using L2 in planning, while the difference in lexical diversity were not statistically significant. Further analysis shows that for speech accuracy, the facilitative effect of L1 was stronger among low-proficient than high-proficient learners. Findings from this study support the use of L2 learners’ entire linguistic repertoire in speaking activities and provides implications on speech production theories as well as translanguaging pedagogies.","PeriodicalId":36383,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of using L1 Chinese or L2 English in planning on speaking performance among high- and low-proficient EFL learners\",\"authors\":\"Yingsheng Liu, Pui-sze Yeung\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40862-023-00210-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Speaking constitutes one of the main goals of learning a second language (L2). Despite the increasing attention on the role of planning and language transfer in L2 learning, the combined effect of using different languages and pre-task planning on language production remains unclear. This study investigated whether the use of different languages in planning affects speaking performance and whether the effect differs by language proficiency. A total of 84 students in Chinese universities learning English as a foreign language participated in several speaking tasks after planning using their first language (L1) Chinese or L2 English. Findings showed that using L1 in planning results in significantly higher syntactic complexity, accuracy, and fluency in speaking performance than using L2 in planning, while the difference in lexical diversity were not statistically significant. Further analysis shows that for speech accuracy, the facilitative effect of L1 was stronger among low-proficient than high-proficient learners. Findings from this study support the use of L2 learners’ entire linguistic repertoire in speaking activities and provides implications on speech production theories as well as translanguaging pedagogies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00210-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00210-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口语是学习第二语言的主要目标之一。尽管计划和语言迁移在二语学习中的作用越来越受到关注,但使用不同语言和任务前计划对语言产生的综合影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨不同语言的规划是否会影响言语表现,以及这种影响是否因语言能力的不同而不同。共有84名在中国大学学习英语作为外语的学生在计划使用他们的第一语言(L1)汉语或L2英语后参加了几个口语任务。研究结果表明,使用第一语言进行计划时,口语表达的句法复杂性、准确性和流畅性显著高于使用第二语言进行计划时,而词汇多样性差异无统计学意义。进一步分析表明,对于言语准确性,低水平学习者的母语促进作用强于高水平学习者。本研究的发现支持了二语学习者在口语活动中使用整个语言库,并对言语产生理论和译语教学法提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of using L1 Chinese or L2 English in planning on speaking performance among high- and low-proficient EFL learners
Abstract Speaking constitutes one of the main goals of learning a second language (L2). Despite the increasing attention on the role of planning and language transfer in L2 learning, the combined effect of using different languages and pre-task planning on language production remains unclear. This study investigated whether the use of different languages in planning affects speaking performance and whether the effect differs by language proficiency. A total of 84 students in Chinese universities learning English as a foreign language participated in several speaking tasks after planning using their first language (L1) Chinese or L2 English. Findings showed that using L1 in planning results in significantly higher syntactic complexity, accuracy, and fluency in speaking performance than using L2 in planning, while the difference in lexical diversity were not statistically significant. Further analysis shows that for speech accuracy, the facilitative effect of L1 was stronger among low-proficient than high-proficient learners. Findings from this study support the use of L2 learners’ entire linguistic repertoire in speaking activities and provides implications on speech production theories as well as translanguaging pedagogies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Iranian ESP teachers’ emotion labor: a critical perspective Adapting EFL materials and its influences on Indonesia secondary school students’ language learning Syntactic priming in the classroom: using narratives to prime L2 arabic speakers Exploring global linguistic nuances: analyzing region-specific inflectional morpheme frequency in ICNALE Identifying inclusive training needs with the inclusive practices in English language teaching observation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1