经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术和椎板切除术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄伴1级和2级腰椎滑脱的临床疗效

Ashok Sharma, Tarachand Suthar, Mudit Mathur, Vishnu Mittal, Shiv Bhagwan Sharma, Gaurav Mehta
{"title":"经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术和椎板切除术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄伴1级和2级腰椎滑脱的临床疗效","authors":"Ashok Sharma, Tarachand Suthar, Mudit Mathur, Vishnu Mittal, Shiv Bhagwan Sharma, Gaurav Mehta","doi":"10.18502/jost.v9i4.13933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lower back pain is a common cause of disability that affects mobility and quality of life (QOL) in both adult and elderly patients. Initial management of lower back pain includes anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, physiotherapy, and epidural steroid infiltration. Despite multiple attempts of conservative management, if a patient develops refractory radicular pain with or without neurologic deficit and claudication, surgery is indicated. The two main approaches to surgical intervention include decompression (laminectomy only) and decompression with fusion [transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)].
 Methods: The study was done between May 2019 and November 2022. In this randomized study, we compared the clinical outcome of TLIF and laminectomy for single-level lumbar canal stenosis with grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis. Forty patients with single-level lumbar canal stenosis with grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis were randomly divided into two equal groups. Patients in both groups were followed up for 2 years.
 Results: In this study, we also noted estimated amount of blood loss, procedure time, time taken for ambulation, length of hospitalization, and demography. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores improved significantly postoperatively. The modified MacNab criteria suggest the outcomes rated as excellent/good rate of 90% in TLIF and 85% in laminectomy.
 Conclusion: We evaluated that TLIF procedures were associated with slightly more significant improvement in clinical outcomes in all of the scoring systems that were applied; TLIF provides early ambulation but a higher cost of treatment and longer hospital stay compared to laminectomy. Laminectomy procedures are associated with lesser economic burden, hospital stay, and blood loss, as well as shorter surgical duration compared to TLIF.","PeriodicalId":34870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Outcome of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Laminectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Canal Stenosis with Grade 1 and 2 Spondylolisthesis\",\"authors\":\"Ashok Sharma, Tarachand Suthar, Mudit Mathur, Vishnu Mittal, Shiv Bhagwan Sharma, Gaurav Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jost.v9i4.13933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Lower back pain is a common cause of disability that affects mobility and quality of life (QOL) in both adult and elderly patients. Initial management of lower back pain includes anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, physiotherapy, and epidural steroid infiltration. Despite multiple attempts of conservative management, if a patient develops refractory radicular pain with or without neurologic deficit and claudication, surgery is indicated. The two main approaches to surgical intervention include decompression (laminectomy only) and decompression with fusion [transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)].
 Methods: The study was done between May 2019 and November 2022. In this randomized study, we compared the clinical outcome of TLIF and laminectomy for single-level lumbar canal stenosis with grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis. Forty patients with single-level lumbar canal stenosis with grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis were randomly divided into two equal groups. Patients in both groups were followed up for 2 years.
 Results: In this study, we also noted estimated amount of blood loss, procedure time, time taken for ambulation, length of hospitalization, and demography. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores improved significantly postoperatively. The modified MacNab criteria suggest the outcomes rated as excellent/good rate of 90% in TLIF and 85% in laminectomy.
 Conclusion: We evaluated that TLIF procedures were associated with slightly more significant improvement in clinical outcomes in all of the scoring systems that were applied; TLIF provides early ambulation but a higher cost of treatment and longer hospital stay compared to laminectomy. Laminectomy procedures are associated with lesser economic burden, hospital stay, and blood loss, as well as shorter surgical duration compared to TLIF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v9i4.13933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v9i4.13933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰痛是影响成人和老年患者活动能力和生活质量(QOL)的常见致残原因。腰痛的初始治疗包括抗炎药、镇痛药、物理治疗和硬膜外类固醇浸润。尽管多次尝试保守治疗,但如果患者出现难治性神经根性疼痛伴或不伴神经功能缺损和跛行,则需要手术治疗。手术干预的两种主要方法包括减压(仅椎板切除术)和减压融合[经椎间孔腰椎体间融合(tliff)]。 方法:研究时间为2019年5月至2022年11月。在这项随机研究中,我们比较了TLIF和椎板切除术治疗1级和2级腰椎滑脱的单节段腰椎管狭窄的临床结果。40例单节段腰椎管狭窄伴1级和2级腰椎滑脱患者随机分为两组。两组患者均随访2年。 结果:在这项研究中,我们还记录了估计的出血量、手术时间、走动时间、住院时间和人口统计学。术后Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分明显改善。修改后的MacNab标准显示,TLIF的优良率为90%,椎板切除术的优良率为85%。结论:我们评估了在所有应用的评分系统中,TLIF手术与临床结果的略微显著改善相关;TLIF提供早期活动,但与椎板切除术相比,治疗费用更高,住院时间更长。与TLIF相比,椎板切除术的经济负担、住院时间和出血量更小,手术时间也更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Clinical Outcome of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Laminectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Canal Stenosis with Grade 1 and 2 Spondylolisthesis
Background: Lower back pain is a common cause of disability that affects mobility and quality of life (QOL) in both adult and elderly patients. Initial management of lower back pain includes anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, physiotherapy, and epidural steroid infiltration. Despite multiple attempts of conservative management, if a patient develops refractory radicular pain with or without neurologic deficit and claudication, surgery is indicated. The two main approaches to surgical intervention include decompression (laminectomy only) and decompression with fusion [transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)]. Methods: The study was done between May 2019 and November 2022. In this randomized study, we compared the clinical outcome of TLIF and laminectomy for single-level lumbar canal stenosis with grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis. Forty patients with single-level lumbar canal stenosis with grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis were randomly divided into two equal groups. Patients in both groups were followed up for 2 years. Results: In this study, we also noted estimated amount of blood loss, procedure time, time taken for ambulation, length of hospitalization, and demography. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores improved significantly postoperatively. The modified MacNab criteria suggest the outcomes rated as excellent/good rate of 90% in TLIF and 85% in laminectomy. Conclusion: We evaluated that TLIF procedures were associated with slightly more significant improvement in clinical outcomes in all of the scoring systems that were applied; TLIF provides early ambulation but a higher cost of treatment and longer hospital stay compared to laminectomy. Laminectomy procedures are associated with lesser economic burden, hospital stay, and blood loss, as well as shorter surgical duration compared to TLIF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Study of Titanium Elastic Nailing in Forearm Fractures in Elderly Patients Bilateral Asymmetrical Hip Dislocations after Falling from Height: A Case Report and Literature Review Bilateral Radial Head and Neck Nondisplaced Fracture, a Challenge for Treatment: A Case Report Open Soft Tissue Degloving Injuries of Lower Limbs Managed by a Staged Protocol Using Preserved Autologous Skin Graft Comparison of Different Ketofol Procedural Sedation and Analgesic Doses during Orthopedic Procedures in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1