英国并购救济政策变化的战略意义

Q4 Social Sciences Competition Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.4337/clj.2023.02.05
Joel Bamford, Carlo Sushant Chari
{"title":"英国并购救济政策变化的战略意义","authors":"Joel Bamford, Carlo Sushant Chari","doi":"10.4337/clj.2023.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2022 saw significant changes to policy on merger remedies in the UK. This article examines what they mean for merger clearance strategy along four vectors of change: (i) clarification of the Competition and Markets Authority’s remedial powers and procedural constraints following recent judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal; (ii) the CMA’s increased focus on intangible assets when designing remedies; (iii) a revolution in Phase 2 remedies procedure via the first use of a mechanism to concede a substantial lessening of competition to the CMA; and (iv) a substantive evolution in Phase 1 undertakings with the acceptance of creative remedies despite the high threshold for undertakings in lieu of reference to Phase 2 being accepted by the CMA.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":"177 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic implications of changes in UK merger remedy policy\",\"authors\":\"Joel Bamford, Carlo Sushant Chari\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/clj.2023.02.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2022 saw significant changes to policy on merger remedies in the UK. This article examines what they mean for merger clearance strategy along four vectors of change: (i) clarification of the Competition and Markets Authority’s remedial powers and procedural constraints following recent judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal; (ii) the CMA’s increased focus on intangible assets when designing remedies; (iii) a revolution in Phase 2 remedies procedure via the first use of a mechanism to concede a substantial lessening of competition to the CMA; and (iv) a substantive evolution in Phase 1 undertakings with the acceptance of creative remedies despite the high threshold for undertakings in lieu of reference to Phase 2 being accepted by the CMA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"177 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2023.02.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2023.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年,英国并购救济政策发生了重大变化。本文沿着四个变化向量考察了它们对合并许可战略的意义:(i)在竞争上诉法庭最近的判决之后,澄清了竞争和市场管理局的补救权力和程序限制;(ii) CMA在设计补救措施时更加关注无形资产;(iii)通过首次使用一种机制,承认CMA的竞争大幅减少,对第二阶段补救程序进行革命;以及(iv)第一阶段承诺的实质性演变,尽管承诺的高门槛代替参考第二阶段被CMA接受,但仍接受创造性补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategic implications of changes in UK merger remedy policy
2022 saw significant changes to policy on merger remedies in the UK. This article examines what they mean for merger clearance strategy along four vectors of change: (i) clarification of the Competition and Markets Authority’s remedial powers and procedural constraints following recent judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal; (ii) the CMA’s increased focus on intangible assets when designing remedies; (iii) a revolution in Phase 2 remedies procedure via the first use of a mechanism to concede a substantial lessening of competition to the CMA; and (iv) a substantive evolution in Phase 1 undertakings with the acceptance of creative remedies despite the high threshold for undertakings in lieu of reference to Phase 2 being accepted by the CMA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
If the Competition and Markets Authority were an emoji: merger clearance lessons from Meta/Giphy Economists on trial: how to make expert duties, meetings, and hot tubs work The UK and EU competition rules for research and development agreements: falling out of lockstep The assessment and communication of the benefits of competition interventions by the Competition and Markets Authority The risks of a form-based approach to exclusionary abuses of dominance – an economic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1