动态对比增强磁共振成像参数变化作为脊柱转移患者放射治疗后肿瘤反应的早期生物标志物:系统综述

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.3857/roj.2023.00290
Rahmad Mulyadi, Pungky Permata Putri, Handoko Handoko, Ramdinal Aviesena Zairinal, Joedo Prihartono
{"title":"动态对比增强磁共振成像参数变化作为脊柱转移患者放射治疗后肿瘤反应的早期生物标志物:系统综述","authors":"Rahmad Mulyadi, Pungky Permata Putri, Handoko Handoko, Ramdinal Aviesena Zairinal, Joedo Prihartono","doi":"10.3857/roj.2023.00290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This systematic review aims to assess and summarize the clinical values of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameter changes as early biomarkers of tumor responses following radiation therapy (RT) in patients with spinal metastases. Materials and Methods A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies were included if they mentioned DCE-MRI parameter changes before and after RT in patients with spinal metastases with a correlation to tumor responses based on clinical and imaging criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess study quality. Results This systematic review included seven studies involving 107 patients. All seven studies evaluated the transfer constant (Ktrans), six studies evaluated the plasma volume fraction (Vp), three studies evaluated the extravascular extracellular space volume fraction, and two studies evaluated the rate constant. There were variations in the type of primary cancer, RT techniques used, post-treatment scan time, and median follow-up time. Despite the variations, however, the collected evidence generally suggested that significant differences could be detected in DCE-MRI parameters between before and after RT, which might reflect treatment success or failures in long-term follow-up. Responders showed higher reduction and lower values of Ktrans and Vp after RT. DCE-MRI parameters showed changes and detectable recurrences significantly earlier (up to 6 months) than conventional MRI with favorable diagnostic values. Conclusion The results of this systematic review suggested that DCE-MRI parameter changes in patients with spinal metastases could be a promising tool for treatment-response assessment following RT. Lower values and higher reduction of Ktrans and Vp after treatment demonstrated good prediction of local control. Compared to conventional MRI, DCE-MRI showed more rapid changes and earlier prediction of treatment failure. Keywords: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, Spine, Neoplasm metastasis, Radiotherapy","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameter changes as an early biomarker of tumor responses following radiation therapy in patients with spinal metastases: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rahmad Mulyadi, Pungky Permata Putri, Handoko Handoko, Ramdinal Aviesena Zairinal, Joedo Prihartono\",\"doi\":\"10.3857/roj.2023.00290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This systematic review aims to assess and summarize the clinical values of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameter changes as early biomarkers of tumor responses following radiation therapy (RT) in patients with spinal metastases. Materials and Methods A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies were included if they mentioned DCE-MRI parameter changes before and after RT in patients with spinal metastases with a correlation to tumor responses based on clinical and imaging criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess study quality. Results This systematic review included seven studies involving 107 patients. All seven studies evaluated the transfer constant (Ktrans), six studies evaluated the plasma volume fraction (Vp), three studies evaluated the extravascular extracellular space volume fraction, and two studies evaluated the rate constant. There were variations in the type of primary cancer, RT techniques used, post-treatment scan time, and median follow-up time. Despite the variations, however, the collected evidence generally suggested that significant differences could be detected in DCE-MRI parameters between before and after RT, which might reflect treatment success or failures in long-term follow-up. Responders showed higher reduction and lower values of Ktrans and Vp after RT. DCE-MRI parameters showed changes and detectable recurrences significantly earlier (up to 6 months) than conventional MRI with favorable diagnostic values. Conclusion The results of this systematic review suggested that DCE-MRI parameter changes in patients with spinal metastases could be a promising tool for treatment-response assessment following RT. Lower values and higher reduction of Ktrans and Vp after treatment demonstrated good prediction of local control. Compared to conventional MRI, DCE-MRI showed more rapid changes and earlier prediction of treatment failure. Keywords: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, Spine, Neoplasm metastasis, Radiotherapy\",\"PeriodicalId\":46572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本系统综述旨在评估和总结动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参数变化作为脊柱转移患者放射治疗(RT)后肿瘤反应的早期生物标志物的临床价值。材料与方法系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Science Direct、Cochrane和Embase 5个电子数据库。如果研究中提到脊髓转移患者放疗前后的DCE-MRI参数变化与基于临床和影像学标准的肿瘤反应相关,则纳入研究。诊断准确性研究质量评估2用于评估研究质量。结果本系统综述纳入7项研究,涉及107例患者。所有7项研究评估了传递常数(Ktrans), 6项研究评估了血浆体积分数(Vp), 3项研究评估了血管外细胞外空间体积分数,2项研究评估了速率常数。原发癌症类型、使用的放射治疗技术、治疗后扫描时间和中位随访时间存在差异。然而,尽管存在差异,但收集到的证据普遍表明,在RT前后,DCE-MRI参数可以检测到显着差异,这可能反映了长期随访的治疗成功或失败。应答者在rt后Ktrans和Vp的降低率更高,值更低。与传统MRI相比,DCE-MRI参数的变化和可检测的复发明显更早(可达6个月),具有良好的诊断价值。结论本系统综述的结果表明,脊柱转移患者的DCE-MRI参数变化可能是评估rt后治疗反应的一个有希望的工具。治疗后Ktrans和Vp的低值和较高的降低表明了对局部控制的良好预测。与常规MRI相比,DCE-MRI表现出更快的变化和更早的治疗失败预测。关键词:多参数磁共振成像;脊柱;肿瘤转移
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameter changes as an early biomarker of tumor responses following radiation therapy in patients with spinal metastases: a systematic review
Purpose This systematic review aims to assess and summarize the clinical values of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameter changes as early biomarkers of tumor responses following radiation therapy (RT) in patients with spinal metastases. Materials and Methods A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies were included if they mentioned DCE-MRI parameter changes before and after RT in patients with spinal metastases with a correlation to tumor responses based on clinical and imaging criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess study quality. Results This systematic review included seven studies involving 107 patients. All seven studies evaluated the transfer constant (Ktrans), six studies evaluated the plasma volume fraction (Vp), three studies evaluated the extravascular extracellular space volume fraction, and two studies evaluated the rate constant. There were variations in the type of primary cancer, RT techniques used, post-treatment scan time, and median follow-up time. Despite the variations, however, the collected evidence generally suggested that significant differences could be detected in DCE-MRI parameters between before and after RT, which might reflect treatment success or failures in long-term follow-up. Responders showed higher reduction and lower values of Ktrans and Vp after RT. DCE-MRI parameters showed changes and detectable recurrences significantly earlier (up to 6 months) than conventional MRI with favorable diagnostic values. Conclusion The results of this systematic review suggested that DCE-MRI parameter changes in patients with spinal metastases could be a promising tool for treatment-response assessment following RT. Lower values and higher reduction of Ktrans and Vp after treatment demonstrated good prediction of local control. Compared to conventional MRI, DCE-MRI showed more rapid changes and earlier prediction of treatment failure. Keywords: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, Spine, Neoplasm metastasis, Radiotherapy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Implementing high-dose rate surface mould brachytherapy for carcinoma of eyelid: a practical approach and weekly review The effects of high-dose radiation therapy on bone: a scoping review Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation Long-term toxicities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with or without total body irradiation: a population-based study in Korea Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1