{"title":"欧洲,中东和北非地区和知识生产回顾书籍约瑟夫,S., Meari, L.,和Zaatari, Z.(编辑)。阿拉伯地区参与式性别研究的政治:女性主义田野调查与知识生产。布卢姆斯伯里出版社,2022年。M. Kmak, Björklund, H.《难民与知识生产:欧洲的过去与现在》(第234页)。泰勒,弗朗西斯,2022年。Pace, M.和Völkel, J. C.高等教育中的知识生产:中…","authors":"Dafne Carletti, Sara Tonsy","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2259647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTKnowledge production is one of the most important elements of human interaction. It shapes identities, determines policies, and reflects the understanding of borders and geographies. For instance, how Europe and the MENA region perceive one another depends largely on who creates the discourse, and under which disciplines these discourses are elaborated. For centuries, however, discourse creation has been regulated by neoliberal and patriarchal interests. Such (super-)structures frame how these regions are represented, leading to colonial assumptions, biased knowledge and objectifying research. We argue that knowledge of Europe and the MENA, its creation and diffusion should be critical and horizontal practices, moving towards deterritorialization and decolonisation. Not to succumb to a ‘regional’ hierarchy of global North/South, we need to reflect on the positioning of researchers, acknowledging the liminality of identities, to appreciate the dynamic nature of boundaries, and to revisit various elements of knowledge production as language, freedom of movement, and funding. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Europe, the MENA region and knowledge production <b>Reviewed books</b> Joseph, S., Meari, L., and Zaatari, Z. (Eds.). <i>The Politics of Engaged Gender Research in the Arab Region: Feminist Fieldwork and the Production of Knowledge</i> . <i>Bloomsbury Publishing</i> , 2022.Kmak, M., and Björklund, H. <i>Refugees and Knowledge Production: Europe’s Past and Present (p. 234)</i> . <i>Taylor & Francis</i> , 2022.Pace, M., and Völkel, J. C. <i>Knowledge production in higher education: The Middle…\",\"authors\":\"Dafne Carletti, Sara Tonsy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07036337.2023.2259647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTKnowledge production is one of the most important elements of human interaction. It shapes identities, determines policies, and reflects the understanding of borders and geographies. For instance, how Europe and the MENA region perceive one another depends largely on who creates the discourse, and under which disciplines these discourses are elaborated. For centuries, however, discourse creation has been regulated by neoliberal and patriarchal interests. Such (super-)structures frame how these regions are represented, leading to colonial assumptions, biased knowledge and objectifying research. We argue that knowledge of Europe and the MENA, its creation and diffusion should be critical and horizontal practices, moving towards deterritorialization and decolonisation. Not to succumb to a ‘regional’ hierarchy of global North/South, we need to reflect on the positioning of researchers, acknowledging the liminality of identities, to appreciate the dynamic nature of boundaries, and to revisit various elements of knowledge production as language, freedom of movement, and funding. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2259647\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2259647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Europe, the MENA region and knowledge production Reviewed books Joseph, S., Meari, L., and Zaatari, Z. (Eds.). The Politics of Engaged Gender Research in the Arab Region: Feminist Fieldwork and the Production of Knowledge . Bloomsbury Publishing , 2022.Kmak, M., and Björklund, H. Refugees and Knowledge Production: Europe’s Past and Present (p. 234) . Taylor & Francis , 2022.Pace, M., and Völkel, J. C. Knowledge production in higher education: The Middle…
ABSTRACTKnowledge production is one of the most important elements of human interaction. It shapes identities, determines policies, and reflects the understanding of borders and geographies. For instance, how Europe and the MENA region perceive one another depends largely on who creates the discourse, and under which disciplines these discourses are elaborated. For centuries, however, discourse creation has been regulated by neoliberal and patriarchal interests. Such (super-)structures frame how these regions are represented, leading to colonial assumptions, biased knowledge and objectifying research. We argue that knowledge of Europe and the MENA, its creation and diffusion should be critical and horizontal practices, moving towards deterritorialization and decolonisation. Not to succumb to a ‘regional’ hierarchy of global North/South, we need to reflect on the positioning of researchers, acknowledging the liminality of identities, to appreciate the dynamic nature of boundaries, and to revisit various elements of knowledge production as language, freedom of movement, and funding. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).