1型糖尿病和健康信息系统:丹麦的经验教训

David Beran, Kurt Højlund, Anders Green
{"title":"1型糖尿病和健康信息系统:丹麦的经验教训","authors":"David Beran, Kurt Højlund, Anders Green","doi":"10.33590/emjdiabet/10300830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the components of a health system as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) is data that the health system collects, generates, and uses to improve the health of its population. The aim of this paper is to describe key lessons from Denmark in planning, implementing, and using health system-generated data, using Type 1 diabetes as a tracer. A broad literature search was complemented with a review of grey literature, two series of interviews with Danish experts, and feedback from a presentation of these findings to two expert meetings. Denmark, through its unique identifier and data environment, enables the health system to collect a variety of data on Type 1 diabetes. Facilitators and challenges exist for data collection, data aggregation, use of data, communication of data and results, and intangible factors. For each of these, the environment, infrastructure, health system, and Danish society act as facilitators. Barriers relate to data being collected primarily for clinical and administrative purposes, and not necessarily for research, planning, policymaking, or advocacy. Fora are lacking to facilitate the communication and presentation of these results. An intangible element is the trust Danes have in their system, which is hard to replicate. As shown in the Danish setting, contextual factors cannot be negated in developing and implementing data-related solutions at a population level. The lessons from Denmark show that there is the need to conceive and act on all aspects of the data from its collection, aggregation, use, and communication. The last step of interaction between science and policy and practice requires a range of factors, including networks and knowledge brokers.","PeriodicalId":91678,"journal":{"name":"European medical journal. Diabetes","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type 1 Diabetes and Health Information Systems: Lessons from Denmark\",\"authors\":\"David Beran, Kurt Højlund, Anders Green\",\"doi\":\"10.33590/emjdiabet/10300830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the components of a health system as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) is data that the health system collects, generates, and uses to improve the health of its population. The aim of this paper is to describe key lessons from Denmark in planning, implementing, and using health system-generated data, using Type 1 diabetes as a tracer. A broad literature search was complemented with a review of grey literature, two series of interviews with Danish experts, and feedback from a presentation of these findings to two expert meetings. Denmark, through its unique identifier and data environment, enables the health system to collect a variety of data on Type 1 diabetes. Facilitators and challenges exist for data collection, data aggregation, use of data, communication of data and results, and intangible factors. For each of these, the environment, infrastructure, health system, and Danish society act as facilitators. Barriers relate to data being collected primarily for clinical and administrative purposes, and not necessarily for research, planning, policymaking, or advocacy. Fora are lacking to facilitate the communication and presentation of these results. An intangible element is the trust Danes have in their system, which is hard to replicate. As shown in the Danish setting, contextual factors cannot be negated in developing and implementing data-related solutions at a population level. The lessons from Denmark show that there is the need to conceive and act on all aspects of the data from its collection, aggregation, use, and communication. The last step of interaction between science and policy and practice requires a range of factors, including networks and knowledge brokers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European medical journal. Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European medical journal. Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/10300830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European medical journal. Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/10300830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的定义,卫生系统的组成部分之一是卫生系统收集、产生和用于改善其人口健康的数据。本文的目的是描述丹麦在规划、实施和使用卫生系统生成的数据方面的主要经验教训,使用1型糖尿病作为示踪剂。广泛的文献检索辅以灰色文献综述,与丹麦专家进行了两次系列访谈,并在两次专家会议上介绍了这些发现的反馈。丹麦通过其独特的标识符和数据环境,使卫生系统能够收集有关1型糖尿病的各种数据。数据收集、数据汇总、数据使用、数据和结果的交流以及无形因素都存在着促进因素和挑战。环境、基础设施、卫生系统和丹麦社会都是其中的推动者。障碍与主要用于临床和管理目的的数据收集有关,而不一定用于研究、计划、政策制定或宣传。缺乏论坛来促进这些结果的交流和介绍。一个无形的因素是丹麦人对他们体系的信任,这是很难复制的。如丹麦的情况所示,在人口一级拟订和执行与数据有关的解决办法时,不能排除环境因素。丹麦的经验表明,有必要从数据的收集、汇总、使用和交流的各个方面构思和采取行动。科学与政策和实践之间相互作用的最后一步需要一系列因素,包括网络和知识中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Type 1 Diabetes and Health Information Systems: Lessons from Denmark
One of the components of a health system as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) is data that the health system collects, generates, and uses to improve the health of its population. The aim of this paper is to describe key lessons from Denmark in planning, implementing, and using health system-generated data, using Type 1 diabetes as a tracer. A broad literature search was complemented with a review of grey literature, two series of interviews with Danish experts, and feedback from a presentation of these findings to two expert meetings. Denmark, through its unique identifier and data environment, enables the health system to collect a variety of data on Type 1 diabetes. Facilitators and challenges exist for data collection, data aggregation, use of data, communication of data and results, and intangible factors. For each of these, the environment, infrastructure, health system, and Danish society act as facilitators. Barriers relate to data being collected primarily for clinical and administrative purposes, and not necessarily for research, planning, policymaking, or advocacy. Fora are lacking to facilitate the communication and presentation of these results. An intangible element is the trust Danes have in their system, which is hard to replicate. As shown in the Danish setting, contextual factors cannot be negated in developing and implementing data-related solutions at a population level. The lessons from Denmark show that there is the need to conceive and act on all aspects of the data from its collection, aggregation, use, and communication. The last step of interaction between science and policy and practice requires a range of factors, including networks and knowledge brokers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chrono-nutrition and its Association with Chronotype and Blood Glucose Control Among People with Type 2 Diabetes Interview: Pia Leete Interview: Maggie Shepherd Type 1 Diabetes and Health Information Systems: Lessons from Denmark Partial Clinical Remission of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Children: Clinical Applications and Challenges with its Definitions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1