疫苗犹豫的背景:影响COVID-19疫苗摄取因素的范围综述

Lotus Alphonsus, Kavita Bailey, Sara Mojdehi
{"title":"疫苗犹豫的背景:影响COVID-19疫苗摄取因素的范围综述","authors":"Lotus Alphonsus, Kavita Bailey, Sara Mojdehi","doi":"10.26685/urncst.533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The development of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial in the fight against the pandemic; however, vaccine hesitancy was a growing concern amplified by the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. This review aims to explore the underlying factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy, including socio-demographic characteristics and health beliefs. Methods: We conducted a scoping review to examine literature and major factors impacting people's willingness to take COVID-19 vaccines. A literature search was performed using four major literature databases: Medline®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and Scopus®. A total of 30 articles fit the predetermined criteria for this sample search. The articles were independently screened to identify the study location, sampling method, study design, and enablers and barriers to vaccination. Results: Studies were included from five different continents and the findings indicating the following six main areas had significant impact on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: (1) vaccine safety and efficacy, (2) trust in government and political views, (3) COVID-19 risk perception, (4) cultural factors, (5) knowledge about COVID-19 and public health messaging, and (6) income level and vaccine cost. Various studies had conflicting results highlighting the influence of environmental factors and the need for unique and targeted public health interventions. Conclusion: Identifying and understanding factors that affect vaccine uptake can aid in the development of effective strategies to improve public health. Our findings suggest that additional efforts should be made by healthcare personnel and public health officials in terms of educating the public and understanding the influence of environmental and personal belief factors. Financial barriers should also be carefully considered to overcome accessibility issues in countries where healthcare is not funded by the government.","PeriodicalId":245521,"journal":{"name":"Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal","volume":"239 3-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextualizing Vaccine Hesitancy: A Scoping Review of Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake\",\"authors\":\"Lotus Alphonsus, Kavita Bailey, Sara Mojdehi\",\"doi\":\"10.26685/urncst.533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The development of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial in the fight against the pandemic; however, vaccine hesitancy was a growing concern amplified by the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. This review aims to explore the underlying factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy, including socio-demographic characteristics and health beliefs. Methods: We conducted a scoping review to examine literature and major factors impacting people's willingness to take COVID-19 vaccines. A literature search was performed using four major literature databases: Medline®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and Scopus®. A total of 30 articles fit the predetermined criteria for this sample search. The articles were independently screened to identify the study location, sampling method, study design, and enablers and barriers to vaccination. Results: Studies were included from five different continents and the findings indicating the following six main areas had significant impact on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: (1) vaccine safety and efficacy, (2) trust in government and political views, (3) COVID-19 risk perception, (4) cultural factors, (5) knowledge about COVID-19 and public health messaging, and (6) income level and vaccine cost. Various studies had conflicting results highlighting the influence of environmental factors and the need for unique and targeted public health interventions. Conclusion: Identifying and understanding factors that affect vaccine uptake can aid in the development of effective strategies to improve public health. Our findings suggest that additional efforts should be made by healthcare personnel and public health officials in terms of educating the public and understanding the influence of environmental and personal belief factors. Financial barriers should also be carefully considered to overcome accessibility issues in countries where healthcare is not funded by the government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal\",\"volume\":\"239 3-4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26685/urncst.533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26685/urncst.533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19疫苗的开发对抗击大流行至关重要;然而,COVID-19疫苗的快速发展加剧了人们对疫苗犹豫的担忧。本综述旨在探讨影响疫苗接受和犹豫的潜在因素,包括社会人口统计学特征和健康信念。方法:我们进行了一项范围综述,查阅文献和影响人们接种COVID-19疫苗意愿的主要因素。使用四个主要的文献数据库:Medline®、Embase®、CINAHL®和Scopus®进行文献检索。总共有30篇文章符合这个样本搜索的预定条件。对文章进行独立筛选,以确定研究地点、抽样方法、研究设计以及疫苗接种的促进因素和障碍。结果:来自五大洲的研究结果表明,以下六个主要领域对COVID-19疫苗接受度有显著影响:(1)疫苗安全性和有效性,(2)对政府和政治观点的信任,(3)COVID-19风险认知,(4)文化因素,(5)COVID-19知识和公共卫生信息,(6)收入水平和疫苗成本。各种研究的结果相互矛盾,突出了环境因素的影响以及需要采取独特和有针对性的公共卫生干预措施。结论:识别和了解影响疫苗摄取的因素有助于制定有效的策略来改善公共卫生。我们的研究结果表明,卫生保健人员和公共卫生官员应该在教育公众和了解环境和个人信仰因素的影响方面做出更多的努力。还应仔细考虑财政障碍,以便在政府不资助医疗保健的国家克服可及性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contextualizing Vaccine Hesitancy: A Scoping Review of Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake
Background: The development of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial in the fight against the pandemic; however, vaccine hesitancy was a growing concern amplified by the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. This review aims to explore the underlying factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy, including socio-demographic characteristics and health beliefs. Methods: We conducted a scoping review to examine literature and major factors impacting people's willingness to take COVID-19 vaccines. A literature search was performed using four major literature databases: Medline®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and Scopus®. A total of 30 articles fit the predetermined criteria for this sample search. The articles were independently screened to identify the study location, sampling method, study design, and enablers and barriers to vaccination. Results: Studies were included from five different continents and the findings indicating the following six main areas had significant impact on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: (1) vaccine safety and efficacy, (2) trust in government and political views, (3) COVID-19 risk perception, (4) cultural factors, (5) knowledge about COVID-19 and public health messaging, and (6) income level and vaccine cost. Various studies had conflicting results highlighting the influence of environmental factors and the need for unique and targeted public health interventions. Conclusion: Identifying and understanding factors that affect vaccine uptake can aid in the development of effective strategies to improve public health. Our findings suggest that additional efforts should be made by healthcare personnel and public health officials in terms of educating the public and understanding the influence of environmental and personal belief factors. Financial barriers should also be carefully considered to overcome accessibility issues in countries where healthcare is not funded by the government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INNOVATX Global Health Case Competition 2024 – Presented by McMaster Friends of Médecins Sans Frontières The Effects of Alistipes-Produced GABA on the Murine Gut-Brain Serotonergic System and Major Depressive Disorder: A Research Protocol MISA Case Competition 2024 Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography Signatures of Ketamine Treatment in Depression: A Literature Review The The Role of ICAM-1 on Immune Cells in Glioblastoma: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1