更新创造力的标准定义,以考虑人工智能的人工创造力

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Creativity Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977
Mark A. Runco
{"title":"更新创造力的标准定义,以考虑人工智能的人工创造力","authors":"Mark A. Runco","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updating the Standard Definition of Creativity to Account for the Artificial Creativity of AI\",\"authors\":\"Mark A. Runco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creativity Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creativity Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

人工智能的最新发展迫使人们对“创造力的标准定义”进行更新。这篇短文引用了对标准定义的各种建议,包括惊喜、价值、真实性和意向性。后两者在区分人类创造力和人工(机器)创造力时最有用。人工创造力可以与伪创造力对比,也可以与人的创造力对比。人工创造力可能是描述人工智能产出的最佳方式。即使这种产出是原创和有效的,它也缺乏人类创造力中显而易见的真实性和意向性。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。截至2023年6月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Updating the Standard Definition of Creativity to Account for the Artificial Creativity of AI
ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Creativity Research Journal publishes high-quality, scholarly research capturing the full range of approaches to the study of creativity--behavioral, clinical, cognitive, crosscultural, developmental, educational, genetic, organizational, psychoanalytic, psychometrics, and social. Interdisciplinary research is also published, as is research within specific domains (e.g., art, science) and research on critical issues (e.g., aesthetics, genius, imagery, imagination, incubation, insight, intuition, metaphor, play, problem finding and solving). Integrative literature reviews and theoretical pieces that appreciate empirical work are extremely welcome, but purely speculative articles are not published. Readers are encouraged to send commentaries, comments, and evaluative book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Drawings’ Creativity: Synchrony Effects on Rater Bias and the Mediating Role of Emotional Arousal Inaugural Issue of CRJ as the Journal of the Society for the Neuroscience of Creativity: Introduction to Volume 2 of the Special Issue Creativity in the West and the East: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Cultural Differences Narcissism Mediates the Relationship Between Helicopter Parenting and Divergent Creativity, but Not Convergent Creativity Dissociating Semantic Integration and Inhibitory Control in the Remote Associates Test: A tDCS-EEG Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1