尼日利亚中北部某教学医院临床医科学生对世卫组织安全手术检查表的了解和应用:一项定量分析研究

Daniel David OTOBO, Mary Ehi EKOJA, Nnaemeka Philip UGWU, Obakpororo Henry PALMER, Jacob ADEFILA, Ozioma Bethrand CHUKWU, Mubarak Adewale ISHOLA, Laughter AMAMCHUKWU, Aymar AKILIMALI
{"title":"尼日利亚中北部某教学医院临床医科学生对世卫组织安全手术检查表的了解和应用:一项定量分析研究","authors":"Daniel David OTOBO, Mary Ehi EKOJA, Nnaemeka Philip UGWU, Obakpororo Henry PALMER, Jacob ADEFILA, Ozioma Bethrand CHUKWU, Mubarak Adewale ISHOLA, Laughter AMAMCHUKWU, Aymar AKILIMALI","doi":"10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4a.1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This checklist serves as a tool to enhance communication and teamwork among surgical teams, reducing the occurrence of adverse events during surgery. However, its implementation and utilization in some regions especially the LMICs in Africa present unique challenges. This study aimed to explore the knowledge and application of the WHO surgical checklist among clinical medical students in north -central zone of Nigeria. This was done via a single-blinded cross-sectional study among 186 penultimate and final-year clinical medical students at Bingham University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. We found that 25.8% and 22.6% of the respondents had good and very good knowledge of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist, respectively. About half of the respondents acquired their knowledge from the classroom alone, while the others were from class lectures and extracurricular activities. The most applied component of the surgical checklist was the sign-in (61.3%), followed by the sign-out (38.7%), while the time-out was the least (32.2%). While the general surgeons (36%) and the obstetricians and gynecologists (29%) were the most likely to adhere to the safe surgical checklists in their procedures, the orthopaedics surgeons were the least likely (3%). While the sign-in remains the most applied component of the checklist, with time-out being the least, we should know that each component has its safety potential.","PeriodicalId":14421,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Science","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¬Knowledge and application of the who safe surgical checklist amongst clinical medical students in a teaching Hospital in north-central, Nigeria: A quantitative analytical study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel David OTOBO, Mary Ehi EKOJA, Nnaemeka Philip UGWU, Obakpororo Henry PALMER, Jacob ADEFILA, Ozioma Bethrand CHUKWU, Mubarak Adewale ISHOLA, Laughter AMAMCHUKWU, Aymar AKILIMALI\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4a.1021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This checklist serves as a tool to enhance communication and teamwork among surgical teams, reducing the occurrence of adverse events during surgery. However, its implementation and utilization in some regions especially the LMICs in Africa present unique challenges. This study aimed to explore the knowledge and application of the WHO surgical checklist among clinical medical students in north -central zone of Nigeria. This was done via a single-blinded cross-sectional study among 186 penultimate and final-year clinical medical students at Bingham University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. We found that 25.8% and 22.6% of the respondents had good and very good knowledge of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist, respectively. About half of the respondents acquired their knowledge from the classroom alone, while the others were from class lectures and extracurricular activities. The most applied component of the surgical checklist was the sign-in (61.3%), followed by the sign-out (38.7%), while the time-out was the least (32.2%). While the general surgeons (36%) and the obstetricians and gynecologists (29%) were the most likely to adhere to the safe surgical checklists in their procedures, the orthopaedics surgeons were the least likely (3%). While the sign-in remains the most applied component of the checklist, with time-out being the least, we should know that each component has its safety potential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Science\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4a.1021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2023.v7.i4a.1021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此检查表可作为加强手术团队之间沟通和团队合作的工具,减少手术过程中不良事件的发生。然而,在一些区域,特别是非洲的中低收入国家,它的实施和利用面临着独特的挑战。本研究旨在探讨尼日利亚中北部地区临床医学生对WHO手术检查表的了解和应用情况。这项研究是通过一项单盲横断面研究在尼日利亚宾厄姆大学教学医院的186名倒数第二年和最后一年的临床医科学生中完成的。我们发现,25.8%和22.6%的受访者分别对世卫组织安全手术清单有良好和非常好的了解。大约一半的受访者从课堂上获得知识,而其他人则从课堂讲座和课外活动中获得知识。手术检查表中应用最多的是签到(61.3%),其次是签到(38.7%),而暂停(32.2%)最少。普通外科医生(36%)和妇产科医生(29%)最有可能在他们的手术中遵守安全手术清单,而骨科医生的可能性最低(3%)。虽然登录仍然是检查表中应用最多的组件,而超时是最少的,但我们应该知道每个组件都有其安全潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¬Knowledge and application of the who safe surgical checklist amongst clinical medical students in a teaching Hospital in north-central, Nigeria: A quantitative analytical study
This checklist serves as a tool to enhance communication and teamwork among surgical teams, reducing the occurrence of adverse events during surgery. However, its implementation and utilization in some regions especially the LMICs in Africa present unique challenges. This study aimed to explore the knowledge and application of the WHO surgical checklist among clinical medical students in north -central zone of Nigeria. This was done via a single-blinded cross-sectional study among 186 penultimate and final-year clinical medical students at Bingham University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. We found that 25.8% and 22.6% of the respondents had good and very good knowledge of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist, respectively. About half of the respondents acquired their knowledge from the classroom alone, while the others were from class lectures and extracurricular activities. The most applied component of the surgical checklist was the sign-in (61.3%), followed by the sign-out (38.7%), while the time-out was the least (32.2%). While the general surgeons (36%) and the obstetricians and gynecologists (29%) were the most likely to adhere to the safe surgical checklists in their procedures, the orthopaedics surgeons were the least likely (3%). While the sign-in remains the most applied component of the checklist, with time-out being the least, we should know that each component has its safety potential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison between FNAC and TRU cut biopsy in patients with breast lump Clinical study of mesh repair in Sventral hernia with co-morbidities (diabetes mellitus and/or obesity) in a Tertiary care hospital A comparative study of inguinal hernia repair by open versus laparoscopic technique in paediatric age group Liga Clips vs Bipolar Diathermy for cystic artery sealing in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparative study A comparative study on primary hypospadias repair using dartos fascia flap versus tunica vaginalis flap in paediatric age group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1