某三级医院革兰氏阳性球菌、绿葡萄球菌和肠球菌的流行及耐药趋势

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cukurova Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.17826/cumj.1350843
Hatice Hale GÜMÜŞ
{"title":"某三级医院革兰氏阳性球菌、绿葡萄球菌和肠球菌的流行及耐药趋势","authors":"Hatice Hale GÜMÜŞ","doi":"10.17826/cumj.1350843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Antimicrobial resistance is a silent pandemic. In this study, it was aimed to determine the distribution and resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) isolates, which are among the priority pathogens of the World Health Organization in bloodstream infections. 
 Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted between January 1, 2021 and March 31, 2023. The blood cultures (n=1261), of which microbiologically tested by using an automated system, were screened in the relevant period via laboratory information system. 
 Results: Of the total 941 isolates, 51.9% were S. aureus (n=488), 22.9% were E. faecalis (n=216), and 25.2% were E. faecium (n=237). Of the patients, 89.1% were inpatients (n=838), and 10.9% were outpatients (n=103). The most of patients were hospitalized in internal medicine departments (53.3%) and in intensive care units (35%). Among S. aureus isolates, the resistance rate to benzylpenicillin was 93.8%, to methicillin 44.3%, to teicoplanin 3.7%, and to linezolid 0.4%. Vancomycin and tigecycline resistances were not detected. Of the E. faecalis isolates, 5.5% were resistant to ampicillin, 3.3% to vancomycin, 3.2% to linezolid, and 0.7% to tigecycline. The resistance rates for E. faecium strains were 90.9% for ampicillin, 28.7% for vancomycin, 17.7% for tigecycline, 4.3% for linezolid, and 0.8% for teicoplanin. When the susceptibilities of all three bacteria were compared, a statistically significant difference was found between teicoplanin, vancomycin, tigecycline and linezolid susceptibilities. The methicillin resistance was higher in internal medicine and intensive care units. The levofloxacin and vancomycin resistance were more prevalent in intensive care units. 
 Conclusion: MRSA (44.3%), vancomycin (28.7%) and tigecycline (17.7%) resistant E. faecium rates are well above the national data. The epidemiology on resistance trends, which will guide clinicians in the management of bloodstream infections, should be carried out periodically.","PeriodicalId":10748,"journal":{"name":"Cukurova Medical Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and resistance trends of Gram positive cocci Staphylococcus aereus and Enterococcus spp. in a tertiary care hospital\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Hale GÜMÜŞ\",\"doi\":\"10.17826/cumj.1350843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Antimicrobial resistance is a silent pandemic. In this study, it was aimed to determine the distribution and resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) isolates, which are among the priority pathogens of the World Health Organization in bloodstream infections. 
 Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted between January 1, 2021 and March 31, 2023. The blood cultures (n=1261), of which microbiologically tested by using an automated system, were screened in the relevant period via laboratory information system. 
 Results: Of the total 941 isolates, 51.9% were S. aureus (n=488), 22.9% were E. faecalis (n=216), and 25.2% were E. faecium (n=237). Of the patients, 89.1% were inpatients (n=838), and 10.9% were outpatients (n=103). The most of patients were hospitalized in internal medicine departments (53.3%) and in intensive care units (35%). Among S. aureus isolates, the resistance rate to benzylpenicillin was 93.8%, to methicillin 44.3%, to teicoplanin 3.7%, and to linezolid 0.4%. Vancomycin and tigecycline resistances were not detected. Of the E. faecalis isolates, 5.5% were resistant to ampicillin, 3.3% to vancomycin, 3.2% to linezolid, and 0.7% to tigecycline. The resistance rates for E. faecium strains were 90.9% for ampicillin, 28.7% for vancomycin, 17.7% for tigecycline, 4.3% for linezolid, and 0.8% for teicoplanin. When the susceptibilities of all three bacteria were compared, a statistically significant difference was found between teicoplanin, vancomycin, tigecycline and linezolid susceptibilities. The methicillin resistance was higher in internal medicine and intensive care units. The levofloxacin and vancomycin resistance were more prevalent in intensive care units. 
 Conclusion: MRSA (44.3%), vancomycin (28.7%) and tigecycline (17.7%) resistant E. faecium rates are well above the national data. The epidemiology on resistance trends, which will guide clinicians in the management of bloodstream infections, should be carried out periodically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cukurova Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cukurova Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1350843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cukurova Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1350843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抗菌素耐药性是一种无声的大流行。本研究旨在确定金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)、屎肠球菌(E. faecium)和粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)分离株的分布和耐药趋势,这三种细菌是世界卫生组织在血液感染中优先考虑的病原体。& # x0D;材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,于2021年1月1日至2023年3月31日进行。血液培养物(n=1261)使用自动化系统进行微生物学检测,在相关期间通过实验室信息系统进行筛选。& # x0D;结果:941株分离株中,金黄色葡萄球菌占51.9%(488株),粪肠杆菌占22.9%(216株),粪肠杆菌占25.2%(237株)。其中住院患者占89.1%(838例),门诊患者占10.9%(103例)。大多数患者住在内科(53.3%)和重症监护病房(35%)。金黄色葡萄球菌对青霉素耐药率为93.8%,对甲氧西林耐药率为44.3%,对替柯planin耐药率为3.7%,对利奈唑胺耐药率为0.4%。未检出万古霉素和替加环素耐药。其中,5.5%对氨苄青霉素耐药,3.3%对万古霉素耐药,3.2%对利奈唑胺耐药,0.7%对替加环素耐药。粪肠杆菌对氨苄西林耐药率为90.9%,对万古霉素耐药率为28.7%,对替加环素耐药率为17.7%,对利奈唑胺耐药率为4.3%,对替柯planin耐药率为0.8%。比较三种细菌的敏感性,发现替柯planin、万古霉素、替加环素和利奈唑胺的敏感性差异有统计学意义。内科和重症监护病房耐甲氧西林率较高。左氧氟沙星和万古霉素耐药在重症监护病房更为普遍。& # x0D;结论:耐MRSA(44.3%)、万古霉素(28.7%)和替加环素(17.7%)的粪肠杆菌耐药率均高于全国数据。应定期开展耐药趋势的流行病学研究,这将指导临床医生管理血液感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and resistance trends of Gram positive cocci Staphylococcus aereus and Enterococcus spp. in a tertiary care hospital
Purpose: Antimicrobial resistance is a silent pandemic. In this study, it was aimed to determine the distribution and resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) isolates, which are among the priority pathogens of the World Health Organization in bloodstream infections. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted between January 1, 2021 and March 31, 2023. The blood cultures (n=1261), of which microbiologically tested by using an automated system, were screened in the relevant period via laboratory information system. Results: Of the total 941 isolates, 51.9% were S. aureus (n=488), 22.9% were E. faecalis (n=216), and 25.2% were E. faecium (n=237). Of the patients, 89.1% were inpatients (n=838), and 10.9% were outpatients (n=103). The most of patients were hospitalized in internal medicine departments (53.3%) and in intensive care units (35%). Among S. aureus isolates, the resistance rate to benzylpenicillin was 93.8%, to methicillin 44.3%, to teicoplanin 3.7%, and to linezolid 0.4%. Vancomycin and tigecycline resistances were not detected. Of the E. faecalis isolates, 5.5% were resistant to ampicillin, 3.3% to vancomycin, 3.2% to linezolid, and 0.7% to tigecycline. The resistance rates for E. faecium strains were 90.9% for ampicillin, 28.7% for vancomycin, 17.7% for tigecycline, 4.3% for linezolid, and 0.8% for teicoplanin. When the susceptibilities of all three bacteria were compared, a statistically significant difference was found between teicoplanin, vancomycin, tigecycline and linezolid susceptibilities. The methicillin resistance was higher in internal medicine and intensive care units. The levofloxacin and vancomycin resistance were more prevalent in intensive care units. Conclusion: MRSA (44.3%), vancomycin (28.7%) and tigecycline (17.7%) resistant E. faecium rates are well above the national data. The epidemiology on resistance trends, which will guide clinicians in the management of bloodstream infections, should be carried out periodically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cukurova Medical Journal
Cukurova Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prematüre bebeklerde cinsiyet ve doğum şeklinin sistemik inflamatuar indeksler üzerine etkisi The prevalence of cryptosporidium spp. and other intestinal parasites in elderly patients mTOR inhibition modulates apoptosis and oxidative stress in hindlimb ischemia/reperfusion injury Mekanik ventilasyon modlarının prematüre bebeklerin tükürük kortizol düzeylerine etkisi Neonatal outcomes of patients with vaginal delivery after a Caesarean section
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1