低频无创脑刺激治疗改善神经心理和神经生理功能的有效性:系统综述

Q3 Medicine NeuroRegulation Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.15540/nr.10.3.186
Zainab Khan, Ashi Saif, Adila Parveen
{"title":"低频无创脑刺激治疗改善神经心理和神经生理功能的有效性:系统综述","authors":"Zainab Khan, Ashi Saif, Adila Parveen","doi":"10.15540/nr.10.3.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a technique used to address various mental disorders symptoms. However, it is recently concluded that the quality of clinical trials involving CES is not standardized and lacks sufficient evidence to support its use for improving mental health. The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic examination of evidence of CES in improving mental health. Method. From inception to April 2022, systematic review was conducted using electronic databases MEDLINE (accessed via PubMed), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies. Methodology of all the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using an 11-point PEDro scale by two independent reviewers. Results. Sixteen RCTs were identified to be relevant and their characteristics were evaluated. Thirteen studies concluded CES has favorable effect on variety of mental disorders, particularly on anxiety and depressed symptoms in varied groups. Conclusions. While these positive effects were observed, limitations included insufficient detail about existing treatments, lack of using standardized objective outcome measures for quantifying mental health dysfunction, and uneven representation of CES limiting the generalizability and making it difficult to carry out the pooled quantification and meta-analysis. Despite its shortcomings, literature suggests that CES warrants more research.","PeriodicalId":37439,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRegulation","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Low Frequency Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Therapy for Improving Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Functions: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Khan, Ashi Saif, Adila Parveen\",\"doi\":\"10.15540/nr.10.3.186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a technique used to address various mental disorders symptoms. However, it is recently concluded that the quality of clinical trials involving CES is not standardized and lacks sufficient evidence to support its use for improving mental health. The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic examination of evidence of CES in improving mental health. Method. From inception to April 2022, systematic review was conducted using electronic databases MEDLINE (accessed via PubMed), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies. Methodology of all the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using an 11-point PEDro scale by two independent reviewers. Results. Sixteen RCTs were identified to be relevant and their characteristics were evaluated. Thirteen studies concluded CES has favorable effect on variety of mental disorders, particularly on anxiety and depressed symptoms in varied groups. Conclusions. While these positive effects were observed, limitations included insufficient detail about existing treatments, lack of using standardized objective outcome measures for quantifying mental health dysfunction, and uneven representation of CES limiting the generalizability and making it difficult to carry out the pooled quantification and meta-analysis. Despite its shortcomings, literature suggests that CES warrants more research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.10.3.186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRegulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.10.3.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。颅电刺激(CES)是一种用于治疗各种精神障碍症状的技术。然而,最近得出的结论是,涉及CES的临床试验质量不标准化,缺乏足够的证据支持其用于改善心理健康。本研究的目的是对CES改善心理健康的证据进行系统的检查。方法。从成立到2022年4月,使用MEDLINE(通过PubMed访问)、CENTRAL (Cochrane Library CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials)和Web of Science电子数据库进行系统评价,检索相关研究。所有确定的随机对照试验(rct)的方法学由两名独立评论者使用11分制PEDro量表进行评估。结果。我们确定了16项相关的随机对照试验,并对其特征进行了评估。13项研究表明,CES对多种精神障碍,特别是对不同人群的焦虑和抑郁症状有良好的疗效。结论。虽然观察到这些积极效果,但局限性包括现有治疗方法的细节不足,缺乏使用标准化客观结果测量来量化精神健康功能障碍,以及CES的不均匀代表限制了普遍性,并且难以进行汇总量化和荟萃分析。尽管有缺点,但文献表明,消费电子产品值得进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Low Frequency Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Therapy for Improving Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Functions: A Systematic Review
Introduction. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a technique used to address various mental disorders symptoms. However, it is recently concluded that the quality of clinical trials involving CES is not standardized and lacks sufficient evidence to support its use for improving mental health. The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic examination of evidence of CES in improving mental health. Method. From inception to April 2022, systematic review was conducted using electronic databases MEDLINE (accessed via PubMed), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies. Methodology of all the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using an 11-point PEDro scale by two independent reviewers. Results. Sixteen RCTs were identified to be relevant and their characteristics were evaluated. Thirteen studies concluded CES has favorable effect on variety of mental disorders, particularly on anxiety and depressed symptoms in varied groups. Conclusions. While these positive effects were observed, limitations included insufficient detail about existing treatments, lack of using standardized objective outcome measures for quantifying mental health dysfunction, and uneven representation of CES limiting the generalizability and making it difficult to carry out the pooled quantification and meta-analysis. Despite its shortcomings, literature suggests that CES warrants more research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRegulation
NeuroRegulation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRegulation is a peer-reviewed journal providing an integrated, multidisciplinary perspective on clinically relevant research, treatment, reviews, and public policy for neuroregulation and neurotherapy. NeuroRegulation publishes important findings in these fields with a focus on electroencephalography (EEG), neurofeedback (EEG biofeedback), quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), psychophysiology, biofeedback, heart rate variability, photobiomodulation, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Simulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS); with a focus on treatment of psychiatric, mind-body, and neurological disorders. In addition to research findings and reviews, it is important to stress that publication of case reports is always useful in furthering the advancement of an intervention for both clinical and normative functioning. We strive for high quality and interesting empirical topics presented in a rigorous and scholarly manner. The journal draws from expertise inside and outside of the International Society for Neurofeedback & Research (ISNR) to deliver material which integrates the diverse aspects of the field, to include: *basic science *clinical aspects *treatment evaluation *philosophy *training and certification issues *technology and equipment
期刊最新文献
Top-Level Managers’ Psychophysical Recovery Investigated Through Different Psychophysiological Parameters Benefits From Training Based on Muscle Relaxation and Self-monitoring of HRV-Biofeedback A Critical Review of: Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With 13-Month Follow-Up Validation and Application of a Factorial Model of Attention in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder The Age-Specific Impact of Alpha-Wave Binaural Acoustic Stimulation on Motor-Learning Aptitude Trauma-Informed Neurofeedback for Law Enforcement Occupational and Organizational Stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1