{"title":"新西兰植物区系分类说明:Brachyglottis(菊科)、Corokia(石竹科)、Mida(南洋杉科)和Teucridium(唇形科)四个变种名称的地位","authors":"Peter B. Heenan","doi":"10.1080/0028825x.2023.2276282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTTaxonomic names at the rank of variety are often poorly understood and may be misapplied as their taxonomic circumscriptions can be inadequate. These names often fall out of favour or are neglected until they are eventually abandoned, but uncertainty can remain as to their taxonomic or nomenclatural status. While many variety names persist in the New Zealand flora literature and databases, unlike naming a new taxon there are no formal rules or guidelines for not accepting a name and placing it in synonymy. The taxonomic recognition of four varietal names accepted in the Flora of New Zealand Volume 1 (Allan Citation1961) are assessed against the species to which they are assigned to determine if they warrant continued recognition. These varietal names are Brachyglottis bidwillii var. viridis (Kirk) B.Nord. (Asteraceae), Corokia buddleioides var. linearis Cheeseman (Argophyllaceae), Mida salicifolia var. myrtifolia (A.Cunn.) Allan (Nanodeaceae) and Teucridium parvifolium var. luxurians Cheeseman (Labiatae). For each of these taxa, and the species to which they were assigned, the key characters circumscribing them were analysed. Each of the four varieties are not significantly different from the species to which they have been assigned and are therefore treated as synonyms. While the means of the type species and variety are different, this is not surprising as typically the variety is named for plants that have particularly wide or narrow leaves that mostly occur in a particular part of the range of phenotypic variation. Scatter plots confirm the leaf variation is continuous with no discrete groups. Discriminant analyses demonstrate that specimens were correctly named in only a relatively low percentage of cases, suggesting the measurement ranges are insufficient for reliable recognition and indicative of overlap between the two taxa. Accepted names are listed and a full synonymy is provided, including where necessary the typification of names.KEYWORDS: Brachyglottis bidwillii var. viridisCorokia buddleioides var. linearisMida salicifolia var. myrtifoliaNew Zealand floranomenclaturesynonymtaxonomyTeucridium parvifolium var. luxuriansTeucrium AcknowledgementsI thank the Curators at Auckland War Memorial Museum (AK) and Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (WELT) for access to the collections; and Kerry Ford for comments on the draft manuscript. This research was supported by Strategic Science Investment Funding (SSIF) for Crown Research Institutes from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Science and Innovation Group.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.","PeriodicalId":19317,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxonomic notes on the New Zealand flora: the status of four varietal names in <i>Brachyglottis</i> (Asteraceae), <i>Corokia</i> (Argophyllaceae), <i>Mida</i> (Nanodeaceae) and <i>Teucridium</i> (Labiatae)\",\"authors\":\"Peter B. Heenan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0028825x.2023.2276282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTTaxonomic names at the rank of variety are often poorly understood and may be misapplied as their taxonomic circumscriptions can be inadequate. These names often fall out of favour or are neglected until they are eventually abandoned, but uncertainty can remain as to their taxonomic or nomenclatural status. While many variety names persist in the New Zealand flora literature and databases, unlike naming a new taxon there are no formal rules or guidelines for not accepting a name and placing it in synonymy. The taxonomic recognition of four varietal names accepted in the Flora of New Zealand Volume 1 (Allan Citation1961) are assessed against the species to which they are assigned to determine if they warrant continued recognition. These varietal names are Brachyglottis bidwillii var. viridis (Kirk) B.Nord. (Asteraceae), Corokia buddleioides var. linearis Cheeseman (Argophyllaceae), Mida salicifolia var. myrtifolia (A.Cunn.) Allan (Nanodeaceae) and Teucridium parvifolium var. luxurians Cheeseman (Labiatae). For each of these taxa, and the species to which they were assigned, the key characters circumscribing them were analysed. Each of the four varieties are not significantly different from the species to which they have been assigned and are therefore treated as synonyms. While the means of the type species and variety are different, this is not surprising as typically the variety is named for plants that have particularly wide or narrow leaves that mostly occur in a particular part of the range of phenotypic variation. Scatter plots confirm the leaf variation is continuous with no discrete groups. Discriminant analyses demonstrate that specimens were correctly named in only a relatively low percentage of cases, suggesting the measurement ranges are insufficient for reliable recognition and indicative of overlap between the two taxa. Accepted names are listed and a full synonymy is provided, including where necessary the typification of names.KEYWORDS: Brachyglottis bidwillii var. viridisCorokia buddleioides var. linearisMida salicifolia var. myrtifoliaNew Zealand floranomenclaturesynonymtaxonomyTeucridium parvifolium var. luxuriansTeucrium AcknowledgementsI thank the Curators at Auckland War Memorial Museum (AK) and Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (WELT) for access to the collections; and Kerry Ford for comments on the draft manuscript. This research was supported by Strategic Science Investment Funding (SSIF) for Crown Research Institutes from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Science and Innovation Group.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825x.2023.2276282\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825x.2023.2276282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要品种级的分类名称往往不为人所理解,而且由于其分类界限可能不充分而可能被误用。这些名称经常不受欢迎或被忽视,直到最终被放弃,但它们在分类学或命名学上的地位仍然不确定。虽然新西兰植物文献和数据库中保留了许多品种名称,但与命名新分类单元不同,没有正式的规则或指导方针来不接受名称并将其放置在同义词中。对《新西兰植物志》第一卷(Allan Citation1961)中收录的四个品种名称进行分类鉴定,并与所分配的物种进行比较,以确定它们是否值得继续鉴定。这些品种的名称是Brachyglottis bidwilli var. viridis (Kirk) B.Nord。(Asteraceae),花椒(cheeselaceae),水杨花(salicifolia),桃金娘(a.c nn.)蓝藻科和唇形科细叶唇藻。对每一个分类群及其所归属的物种,分析了限定它们的关键特征。这四个品种中的每一个都与它们所指定的物种没有显著差异,因此被视为同义词。虽然模式物种和变种的含义不同,但这并不奇怪,因为典型的变种是以那些叶子特别宽或特别窄的植物命名的,这些植物大多出现在表型变异范围的特定部分。散点图证实叶片变化是连续的,没有离散组。判别分析表明,标本被正确命名的比例相对较低,表明测量范围不足以进行可靠的识别,并表明两个分类群之间存在重叠。列出了公认的名称,并提供了完整的同义词,包括必要时名称的类型化。毕业论文关键词:布氏短门草(Brachyglottis bidwilliami var. viritis buleioides var. buleioides)水杨花(mida salicifolia var. myrtifolies)新西兰植物学名同义分类学(synonymtaxonomy)我感谢奥克兰战争纪念博物馆(AK)和新西兰帕帕汤加雷瓦博物馆(WELT)的馆长提供这些藏品;和Kerry Ford对草稿的评论。本研究得到了商业、创新和就业部科学与创新小组皇冠研究所战略科学投资基金(SSIF)的支持。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了商业、创新和就业部的支持。
Taxonomic notes on the New Zealand flora: the status of four varietal names in Brachyglottis (Asteraceae), Corokia (Argophyllaceae), Mida (Nanodeaceae) and Teucridium (Labiatae)
ABSTRACTTaxonomic names at the rank of variety are often poorly understood and may be misapplied as their taxonomic circumscriptions can be inadequate. These names often fall out of favour or are neglected until they are eventually abandoned, but uncertainty can remain as to their taxonomic or nomenclatural status. While many variety names persist in the New Zealand flora literature and databases, unlike naming a new taxon there are no formal rules or guidelines for not accepting a name and placing it in synonymy. The taxonomic recognition of four varietal names accepted in the Flora of New Zealand Volume 1 (Allan Citation1961) are assessed against the species to which they are assigned to determine if they warrant continued recognition. These varietal names are Brachyglottis bidwillii var. viridis (Kirk) B.Nord. (Asteraceae), Corokia buddleioides var. linearis Cheeseman (Argophyllaceae), Mida salicifolia var. myrtifolia (A.Cunn.) Allan (Nanodeaceae) and Teucridium parvifolium var. luxurians Cheeseman (Labiatae). For each of these taxa, and the species to which they were assigned, the key characters circumscribing them were analysed. Each of the four varieties are not significantly different from the species to which they have been assigned and are therefore treated as synonyms. While the means of the type species and variety are different, this is not surprising as typically the variety is named for plants that have particularly wide or narrow leaves that mostly occur in a particular part of the range of phenotypic variation. Scatter plots confirm the leaf variation is continuous with no discrete groups. Discriminant analyses demonstrate that specimens were correctly named in only a relatively low percentage of cases, suggesting the measurement ranges are insufficient for reliable recognition and indicative of overlap between the two taxa. Accepted names are listed and a full synonymy is provided, including where necessary the typification of names.KEYWORDS: Brachyglottis bidwillii var. viridisCorokia buddleioides var. linearisMida salicifolia var. myrtifoliaNew Zealand floranomenclaturesynonymtaxonomyTeucridium parvifolium var. luxuriansTeucrium AcknowledgementsI thank the Curators at Auckland War Memorial Museum (AK) and Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (WELT) for access to the collections; and Kerry Ford for comments on the draft manuscript. This research was supported by Strategic Science Investment Funding (SSIF) for Crown Research Institutes from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Science and Innovation Group.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.
期刊介绍:
The New Zealand Journal of Botany publishes original research papers, review papers, perspectives, short communications, forum articles, letter and book reviews. We welcome submissions relevant to all aspects of the botany, mycology, and phycology of the South Pacific, Australia, South America, and Southern Africa. The journal’s subject matter encompasses biosystematics and biogeography, ecology, physiology, biochemistry, genetics, reproductive biology, structure and development, taxonomy, ethnobotany, palaeobotany, bryology, lichenology, mycology, plant pathology, and phycology.