{"title":"天才概念的形成与规范美学的终结","authors":"Radovan Popović","doi":"10.5937/zbaku2311106p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of beauty, based on the criterion of taste, marks the boundary that separates the era of normative aesthetics of classicism from the time when rejected elements played a decisive role in art. These elements include the subjectivation of experience, individual feelings as the driving force in the reception of art, and the individualization of criteria for judging artistic values. A new term emerges as the equivalent of rationalist sensus communis and classicist raison. This term can be tentatively defined as moderation (bon sens) or more narrowly, as politeness. While ancient art embodies unchanging and universal norms of artistic creation, leading to a historico-philosophical dualism, pre-romanticism, with its emphasis on sentimentality, demands a conceptual differentiation and nuancing of rational rules, taking into account cultural-philosophical and collective-psychological factors that modify those rules to fit specific creative contexts. Within sentimentalist-romantic theories of artistic creativity, the problem of genius arises, countering the rigid prescriptionism of pseudo-Horacian poetics and notions of mimesis as the constant imitation of immediate events and actions, and their 'possible' or 'probable' variants. An ingenious work of art in this context, relies not only on the strength of feelings and the immediacy of the artist's experience, but also on their ability to shape a flawless paradigm in their mind through unreflective, imaginative transposition. This paradigm is then brought to life using relevant materials. A genius artist does not oppose the rules in their creation; on the contrary, they understands them more deeply and reliably than someone who, in a fervent pursuit of innovation, abandons the safe and shortest path to artistic truth. Abbé Du Bos, Denis Diderot, and Johann Georg Hamann have delved into thisissue, shedding light on it and interpreting it from different angles, making lasting contributions to the aesthetics and theory of pre-romantic and romantic art.","PeriodicalId":31481,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meisterstreich: The formation of the concept of genius and the end of normative aesthetics\",\"authors\":\"Radovan Popović\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/zbaku2311106p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of beauty, based on the criterion of taste, marks the boundary that separates the era of normative aesthetics of classicism from the time when rejected elements played a decisive role in art. These elements include the subjectivation of experience, individual feelings as the driving force in the reception of art, and the individualization of criteria for judging artistic values. A new term emerges as the equivalent of rationalist sensus communis and classicist raison. This term can be tentatively defined as moderation (bon sens) or more narrowly, as politeness. While ancient art embodies unchanging and universal norms of artistic creation, leading to a historico-philosophical dualism, pre-romanticism, with its emphasis on sentimentality, demands a conceptual differentiation and nuancing of rational rules, taking into account cultural-philosophical and collective-psychological factors that modify those rules to fit specific creative contexts. Within sentimentalist-romantic theories of artistic creativity, the problem of genius arises, countering the rigid prescriptionism of pseudo-Horacian poetics and notions of mimesis as the constant imitation of immediate events and actions, and their 'possible' or 'probable' variants. An ingenious work of art in this context, relies not only on the strength of feelings and the immediacy of the artist's experience, but also on their ability to shape a flawless paradigm in their mind through unreflective, imaginative transposition. This paradigm is then brought to life using relevant materials. A genius artist does not oppose the rules in their creation; on the contrary, they understands them more deeply and reliably than someone who, in a fervent pursuit of innovation, abandons the safe and shortest path to artistic truth. Abbé Du Bos, Denis Diderot, and Johann Georg Hamann have delved into thisissue, shedding light on it and interpreting it from different angles, making lasting contributions to the aesthetics and theory of pre-romantic and romantic art.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2311106p\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2311106p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以品味为标准的美的概念,标志着古典主义规范美学时代与拒绝元素在艺术中起决定性作用的时代之间的界限。这些因素包括经验的主体化、个人情感作为艺术接受的驱动力、艺术价值评判标准的个体化。一个新的术语出现了,作为理性主义感性社会和古典主义理性的等价物。这个词可以暂时定义为适度(bon sens),或者更狭义地定义为礼貌。虽然古代艺术体现了不变的和普遍的艺术创作规范,导致了历史哲学的二元论,但前浪漫主义强调感性,要求概念上的区分和理性规则的细微差别,考虑到文化哲学和集体心理因素,修改这些规则以适应特定的创作环境。在感伤主义浪漫主义的艺术创造力理论中,天才的问题出现了,反对伪贺拉斯诗学的严格规定主义和模仿的概念,即不断模仿即时事件和行动,以及它们的“可能的”或“可能的”变体。在这种背景下,一件巧妙的艺术作品不仅依赖于情感的力量和艺术家经验的即时性,而且还依赖于他们通过不加思索、富有想象力的转换在他们的脑海中塑造完美范例的能力。然后使用相关材料将这种范式带入生活。天才艺术家在创作中不反对规则;相反,他们比那些为了追求创新而放弃通往艺术真理的捷径的人更深刻、更可靠。abbous Du Bos、Denis Diderot和Johann Georg Hamann对这一问题进行了深入的研究,从不同的角度对其进行了阐释和解释,为前浪漫主义和浪漫主义艺术的美学和理论做出了持久的贡献。
Meisterstreich: The formation of the concept of genius and the end of normative aesthetics
The concept of beauty, based on the criterion of taste, marks the boundary that separates the era of normative aesthetics of classicism from the time when rejected elements played a decisive role in art. These elements include the subjectivation of experience, individual feelings as the driving force in the reception of art, and the individualization of criteria for judging artistic values. A new term emerges as the equivalent of rationalist sensus communis and classicist raison. This term can be tentatively defined as moderation (bon sens) or more narrowly, as politeness. While ancient art embodies unchanging and universal norms of artistic creation, leading to a historico-philosophical dualism, pre-romanticism, with its emphasis on sentimentality, demands a conceptual differentiation and nuancing of rational rules, taking into account cultural-philosophical and collective-psychological factors that modify those rules to fit specific creative contexts. Within sentimentalist-romantic theories of artistic creativity, the problem of genius arises, countering the rigid prescriptionism of pseudo-Horacian poetics and notions of mimesis as the constant imitation of immediate events and actions, and their 'possible' or 'probable' variants. An ingenious work of art in this context, relies not only on the strength of feelings and the immediacy of the artist's experience, but also on their ability to shape a flawless paradigm in their mind through unreflective, imaginative transposition. This paradigm is then brought to life using relevant materials. A genius artist does not oppose the rules in their creation; on the contrary, they understands them more deeply and reliably than someone who, in a fervent pursuit of innovation, abandons the safe and shortest path to artistic truth. Abbé Du Bos, Denis Diderot, and Johann Georg Hamann have delved into thisissue, shedding light on it and interpreting it from different angles, making lasting contributions to the aesthetics and theory of pre-romantic and romantic art.