党派和宗教信仰对土耳其阴谋论信仰的影响

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociology Compass Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1111/soc4.13152
Türkay Salim Nefes, Ozan Aksoy
{"title":"党派和宗教信仰对土耳其阴谋论信仰的影响","authors":"Türkay Salim Nefes, Ozan Aksoy","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? This paper responds to this ever‐significant question by scrutinizing people's belief in conspiracy theories in Turkey. Building on Max Weber's theory of rationalization, it proposes that value‐laden and instrumentally rational predispositions, namely religiosity and partisanship, predict people's beliefs in conspiracy theories. This current study tests this hypothesis by analyzing two nationwide surveys conducted during a period of significant changes in modern Turkish politics: January and July 2013. The findings confirm the hypothesis that people interpret conspiracy theories in line with their instrumental, rational interests and values.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of partisanship and religiosity on conspiracy‐theory beliefs in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Türkay Salim Nefes, Ozan Aksoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/soc4.13152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? This paper responds to this ever‐significant question by scrutinizing people's belief in conspiracy theories in Turkey. Building on Max Weber's theory of rationalization, it proposes that value‐laden and instrumentally rational predispositions, namely religiosity and partisanship, predict people's beliefs in conspiracy theories. This current study tests this hypothesis by analyzing two nationwide surveys conducted during a period of significant changes in modern Turkish politics: January and July 2013. The findings confirm the hypothesis that people interpret conspiracy theories in line with their instrumental, rational interests and values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么人们相信阴谋论?本文通过审视土耳其人对阴谋论的信仰来回答这个重要的问题。它以马克斯·韦伯的理性化理论为基础,提出了价值取向和工具理性倾向,即宗教信仰和党派倾向,预测了人们对阴谋论的信仰。本研究通过分析在现代土耳其政治发生重大变化期间(2013年1月和7月)进行的两次全国性调查来检验这一假设。研究结果证实了一个假设,即人们根据他们的工具性、理性的利益和价值观来解释阴谋论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of partisanship and religiosity on conspiracy‐theory beliefs in Turkey
Abstract Why do people believe in conspiracy theories? This paper responds to this ever‐significant question by scrutinizing people's belief in conspiracy theories in Turkey. Building on Max Weber's theory of rationalization, it proposes that value‐laden and instrumentally rational predispositions, namely religiosity and partisanship, predict people's beliefs in conspiracy theories. This current study tests this hypothesis by analyzing two nationwide surveys conducted during a period of significant changes in modern Turkish politics: January and July 2013. The findings confirm the hypothesis that people interpret conspiracy theories in line with their instrumental, rational interests and values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
Critical Challenges to the Sociology of Work: From a Perspective of Russian Labor Studies Visual Analysis and the Contentious Politics of the Radical Right Caring Technologies: Confronting Invisible Work in Digital Capitalism Unlocking the Potential of the Decolonial Approach in Migration Studies Everyday Conversations About Economic Inequality: A Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1