{"title":"编织无形:数据驱动的工艺主义作为女权主义的抵抗","authors":"Abigail Moreshead, Anastasia Salter","doi":"10.1080/09589236.2023.2258068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTFeminist scholars are drawing attention to how conventional forms of data representation fail to make visible the experiences of women and marginalized communities. While the problem of reinscribing the in_visibility of already under-visualized communities (and crises) is being acknowledged from a data science perspective, little attention is being paid to how craft redresses these issues of visibility. ‘Craftivism’, or the move towards activist craft, resists both the in_visibility of the form and of the labour that produces it. This essay examines two specific craftivism projects driven by data: Stitching the Curve, a year-long stitched pandemic data project, and the Tempestry Project, which represents climate change data through knitting. Drawing on Andre Brock’s critical technocultural discourse analysis as a methodology to understand how these craftivist data visualizations circulate on social media, we argue that in their form and their content, craftivist data visualizations redress what Perez terms the ‘gender data gap’ through embracing a feminist ethos. These projects offer an essential space for understanding craft’s potential for resistance, modelling the inherent subversion of employing the ‘feminine’ textile as a site for feminist visualization and meaning-making, while also subject to the same challenges as craft itself – dismissal, marginalization and in_visibility.KEYWORDS: Craftivismdatavisualizationknittingfeminism Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAbigail MoresheadAbigail Moreshead has a PhD in Texts & Technology from the University of Central Florida and is currently a visiting lecturer of English at UCF. Her research exists at the intersection of book studies and feminist media studies with a focus on gendered labor in textual production and knowledge creation. Her work has been published in Nineteenth Century Gender Studies and Feminist Media Studies.Anastasia SalterAnastasia Salter is a professor of English at the University of Central Florida, and author most recently of Playful Pedagogy in the Pandemic: Pivoting to Games-Based Learning (with Emily Johnson, Routledge 2022) and Twining: Critical and Creative Approaches to Hypertext Narratives (with Stuart Moulthrop, Amherst College 2021). They serve as Vice President of the Electronic Literature Organization.","PeriodicalId":15911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knitting the in_visible: data-driven craftivism as feminist resistance\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Moreshead, Anastasia Salter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09589236.2023.2258068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTFeminist scholars are drawing attention to how conventional forms of data representation fail to make visible the experiences of women and marginalized communities. While the problem of reinscribing the in_visibility of already under-visualized communities (and crises) is being acknowledged from a data science perspective, little attention is being paid to how craft redresses these issues of visibility. ‘Craftivism’, or the move towards activist craft, resists both the in_visibility of the form and of the labour that produces it. This essay examines two specific craftivism projects driven by data: Stitching the Curve, a year-long stitched pandemic data project, and the Tempestry Project, which represents climate change data through knitting. Drawing on Andre Brock’s critical technocultural discourse analysis as a methodology to understand how these craftivist data visualizations circulate on social media, we argue that in their form and their content, craftivist data visualizations redress what Perez terms the ‘gender data gap’ through embracing a feminist ethos. These projects offer an essential space for understanding craft’s potential for resistance, modelling the inherent subversion of employing the ‘feminine’ textile as a site for feminist visualization and meaning-making, while also subject to the same challenges as craft itself – dismissal, marginalization and in_visibility.KEYWORDS: Craftivismdatavisualizationknittingfeminism Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAbigail MoresheadAbigail Moreshead has a PhD in Texts & Technology from the University of Central Florida and is currently a visiting lecturer of English at UCF. Her research exists at the intersection of book studies and feminist media studies with a focus on gendered labor in textual production and knowledge creation. Her work has been published in Nineteenth Century Gender Studies and Feminist Media Studies.Anastasia SalterAnastasia Salter is a professor of English at the University of Central Florida, and author most recently of Playful Pedagogy in the Pandemic: Pivoting to Games-Based Learning (with Emily Johnson, Routledge 2022) and Twining: Critical and Creative Approaches to Hypertext Narratives (with Stuart Moulthrop, Amherst College 2021). They serve as Vice President of the Electronic Literature Organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gender Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gender Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2258068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2258068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knitting the in_visible: data-driven craftivism as feminist resistance
ABSTRACTFeminist scholars are drawing attention to how conventional forms of data representation fail to make visible the experiences of women and marginalized communities. While the problem of reinscribing the in_visibility of already under-visualized communities (and crises) is being acknowledged from a data science perspective, little attention is being paid to how craft redresses these issues of visibility. ‘Craftivism’, or the move towards activist craft, resists both the in_visibility of the form and of the labour that produces it. This essay examines two specific craftivism projects driven by data: Stitching the Curve, a year-long stitched pandemic data project, and the Tempestry Project, which represents climate change data through knitting. Drawing on Andre Brock’s critical technocultural discourse analysis as a methodology to understand how these craftivist data visualizations circulate on social media, we argue that in their form and their content, craftivist data visualizations redress what Perez terms the ‘gender data gap’ through embracing a feminist ethos. These projects offer an essential space for understanding craft’s potential for resistance, modelling the inherent subversion of employing the ‘feminine’ textile as a site for feminist visualization and meaning-making, while also subject to the same challenges as craft itself – dismissal, marginalization and in_visibility.KEYWORDS: Craftivismdatavisualizationknittingfeminism Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAbigail MoresheadAbigail Moreshead has a PhD in Texts & Technology from the University of Central Florida and is currently a visiting lecturer of English at UCF. Her research exists at the intersection of book studies and feminist media studies with a focus on gendered labor in textual production and knowledge creation. Her work has been published in Nineteenth Century Gender Studies and Feminist Media Studies.Anastasia SalterAnastasia Salter is a professor of English at the University of Central Florida, and author most recently of Playful Pedagogy in the Pandemic: Pivoting to Games-Based Learning (with Emily Johnson, Routledge 2022) and Twining: Critical and Creative Approaches to Hypertext Narratives (with Stuart Moulthrop, Amherst College 2021). They serve as Vice President of the Electronic Literature Organization.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gender Studies is an interdisciplinary journal which publishes articles relating to gender from a feminist perspective covering a wide range of subject areas including the Social and Natural Sciences, Arts and Popular Culture. Reviews of books and details of forthcoming conferences are also included. The Journal of Gender Studies seeks articles from international sources and aims to take account of a diversity of cultural backgrounds and differences in sexual orientation. It encourages contributions which focus on the experiences of both women and men and welcomes articles, written from a feminist perspective, relating to femininity and masculinity and to the social constructions of relationships between men and women.