数字经济能否解决资源错配导致的绿色发展效率损失?来自中国土地交易市场的证据

IF 4.4 4区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environmental Planning and Management Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1080/09640568.2023.2258554
Jianlong Wang, Haitao Wu, Deheng Xiao, Xiaoxiao Luo, Yong Liu, Weilong Wang
{"title":"数字经济能否解决资源错配导致的绿色发展效率损失?来自中国土地交易市场的证据","authors":"Jianlong Wang, Haitao Wu, Deheng Xiao, Xiaoxiao Luo, Yong Liu, Weilong Wang","doi":"10.1080/09640568.2023.2258554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractLand is the driving force of economic growth, but the proliferation of industrial land has resulted in wasted land resources, impaired economic efficiency, and ecological damage in China. Currently, the digital economy is transforming China’s economic growth model. Exploring the corrective mechanisms of the digital economy for land resource mismatch can contribute to efficient economic growth. Using a sample of Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2007–2019, we employ a spatial Durbin model to explore the impact of land resource mismatch on green development efficiency (GDE) in the context of the digital economy, which is critical to rational planning, utilization, and regulation of land resources. The findings show that (1) land resource mismatch inhibits GDE, and the crowding-out, structural inhibition, and agglomeration economy dilution effect are primary influencing mechanisms. (2) A local land resource mismatch harms GDE in neighboring areas. (3) The digital economy has a positive moderating effect on land resource mismatch and GDE. (4) Land resource mismatch reduces GDE in the eastern and central regions; the moderating effect of the digital economy exists only in the eastern region. Finally, this study proposes comprehensive and complete countermeasures to correct the land resource mismatch and its influence channels and enhance the construction of the digital economy. The conclusions of this study provide specific theoretical contributions to promote the spatial allocation efficiency of land resources, promote green and efficient economic development, and stimulate and release the dividends of the digital economy.Keywords: digital economyland resource mismatchgreen development efficiencyspillover effect Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplemental dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed here.Additional informationFundingThis study was jointly funded by the soft science project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 2023JDR0102) and the “Research on Chinese Modernization Based on the Harmonious Coexistence of Human and Nature” of the School of Economics at Sichuan University.","PeriodicalId":48149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the digital economy address the loss of green development efficiency due to resource mismatch? Evidence from China’s land transaction markets\",\"authors\":\"Jianlong Wang, Haitao Wu, Deheng Xiao, Xiaoxiao Luo, Yong Liu, Weilong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09640568.2023.2258554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractLand is the driving force of economic growth, but the proliferation of industrial land has resulted in wasted land resources, impaired economic efficiency, and ecological damage in China. Currently, the digital economy is transforming China’s economic growth model. Exploring the corrective mechanisms of the digital economy for land resource mismatch can contribute to efficient economic growth. Using a sample of Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2007–2019, we employ a spatial Durbin model to explore the impact of land resource mismatch on green development efficiency (GDE) in the context of the digital economy, which is critical to rational planning, utilization, and regulation of land resources. The findings show that (1) land resource mismatch inhibits GDE, and the crowding-out, structural inhibition, and agglomeration economy dilution effect are primary influencing mechanisms. (2) A local land resource mismatch harms GDE in neighboring areas. (3) The digital economy has a positive moderating effect on land resource mismatch and GDE. (4) Land resource mismatch reduces GDE in the eastern and central regions; the moderating effect of the digital economy exists only in the eastern region. Finally, this study proposes comprehensive and complete countermeasures to correct the land resource mismatch and its influence channels and enhance the construction of the digital economy. The conclusions of this study provide specific theoretical contributions to promote the spatial allocation efficiency of land resources, promote green and efficient economic development, and stimulate and release the dividends of the digital economy.Keywords: digital economyland resource mismatchgreen development efficiencyspillover effect Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplemental dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed here.Additional informationFundingThis study was jointly funded by the soft science project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 2023JDR0102) and the “Research on Chinese Modernization Based on the Harmonious Coexistence of Human and Nature” of the School of Economics at Sichuan University.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2258554\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2258554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要土地是经济增长的动力,但工业用地的泛滥造成了土地资源的浪费、经济效益的降低和生态的破坏。当前,数字经济正在改变中国的经济增长模式。探索数字经济对土地资源错配的纠正机制,有助于促进经济高效增长。本文以2007-2019年中国地级市为样本,运用空间Durbin模型探讨了数字经济背景下土地资源错配对绿色发展效率的影响,这对土地资源的合理规划、利用和调控至关重要。结果表明:(1)土地资源错配抑制GDE,挤出效应、结构性抑制效应和集聚经济稀释效应是主要影响机制。(2)局部土地资源错配对周边地区GDE的影响。(3)数字经济对土地资源错配和GDE具有正向调节作用。④土地资源错配降低了东部和中部地区的gdp;数字经济的调节作用仅在东部地区存在。最后,本文提出了全面完善的土地资源错配及其影响渠道纠正对策,加强数字经济建设。本文的研究结论为提升土地资源空间配置效率,促进经济绿色高效发展,激发和释放数字经济红利提供了具体的理论贡献。关键词:数字经济资源错配绿色发展效率溢出效应披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。补充数据本文的补充数据可以在这里访问。本研究由四川省科学技术厅软科学项目(批准号:2023JDR0102)与四川大学经济学院“基于人与自然和谐共生的中国现代化研究”共同资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can the digital economy address the loss of green development efficiency due to resource mismatch? Evidence from China’s land transaction markets
AbstractLand is the driving force of economic growth, but the proliferation of industrial land has resulted in wasted land resources, impaired economic efficiency, and ecological damage in China. Currently, the digital economy is transforming China’s economic growth model. Exploring the corrective mechanisms of the digital economy for land resource mismatch can contribute to efficient economic growth. Using a sample of Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2007–2019, we employ a spatial Durbin model to explore the impact of land resource mismatch on green development efficiency (GDE) in the context of the digital economy, which is critical to rational planning, utilization, and regulation of land resources. The findings show that (1) land resource mismatch inhibits GDE, and the crowding-out, structural inhibition, and agglomeration economy dilution effect are primary influencing mechanisms. (2) A local land resource mismatch harms GDE in neighboring areas. (3) The digital economy has a positive moderating effect on land resource mismatch and GDE. (4) Land resource mismatch reduces GDE in the eastern and central regions; the moderating effect of the digital economy exists only in the eastern region. Finally, this study proposes comprehensive and complete countermeasures to correct the land resource mismatch and its influence channels and enhance the construction of the digital economy. The conclusions of this study provide specific theoretical contributions to promote the spatial allocation efficiency of land resources, promote green and efficient economic development, and stimulate and release the dividends of the digital economy.Keywords: digital economyland resource mismatchgreen development efficiencyspillover effect Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplemental dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed here.Additional informationFundingThis study was jointly funded by the soft science project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology, China (Grant No. 2023JDR0102) and the “Research on Chinese Modernization Based on the Harmonious Coexistence of Human and Nature” of the School of Economics at Sichuan University.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management has already established itself as a leading forum for up-to-date scholarly but accessible papers on all aspects of environmental planning and management. With contributions from leading international authors, the Journal publishes influential, high quality papers -an essential feature whether you are a subscriber, reader, contributor or all three. The Editors and International Editorial Advisory Board are drawn from around the world and are committed to encouraging researchers and practitioners to contribute to multidisciplinary and international debate in the field. The central aim is to focus on the integrated planning and management of the environment.
期刊最新文献
Heroes for nature: understanding childhood nature experiences in motivating action for nature Analysis of the spatial spillover effect of electricity generation from renewable energy on carbon emissions: based on empirical evidence from Chinese provinces and cities Landscape-based spatial energy planning: minimization of renewables footprint in the energy transition Community-based incentive coordination in payments for ecosystem services: China’s Wolong Nature Reserve Relevance of ecosystem services and disservices from green infrastructure perceived by the inhabitants of two Portuguese cities dealing with climate change: implications for environmental and intersectional justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1