{"title":"使用节点积分法对纳维-斯托克斯方程的无雅各布牛顿-克雷洛夫求解器进行基于物理的预处理","authors":"Nadeem Ahmed, Suneet Singh, Niteen Kumar","doi":"10.1002/fld.5236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The nodal integral methods (NIMs) have found widespread use in the nuclear industry for neutron transport problems due to their high accuracy. However, despite considerable development, these methods have limited acceptability among the fluid flow community. One major drawback of these methods is the lack of robust and efficient nonlinear solvers for the algebraic equations resulting from discretization. Since its inception, several modifications have been made to make NIMs more agile, efficient, and accurate. Modified nodal integral method (MNIM) and modified MNIM (M<sup>2</sup>NIM) are the two most recent and efficient versions of the NIM for fluid flow problems. M<sup>2</sup>NIM modifies the MNIM by replacing the current time convective velocity with the previous time convective velocity, leading to faster convergence albeit with reduced accuracy. This work proposes a preconditioned Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov approach for solving the Navier–Stokes equation using MNIM. The Krylov solvers do not generally work well without an appropriate preconditioner. Therefore, M<sup>2</sup>NIM is used here as a preconditioner to accelerate the solution of MNIM. Due to pressure–velocity coupling in the Navier–Stokes equation, developing a quality preconditioner for these equations needs significant effort. The momentum equation is solved using the time-splitting alternate direction implicit method. The velocities obtained from the solution are then used to solve the pressure Poisson equation. The computational results for the Navier–Stokes equation are presented to underscore the advantages of the developed algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"96 2","pages":"138-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physics-based preconditioning of Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov solver for Navier–Stokes equations using nodal integral method\",\"authors\":\"Nadeem Ahmed, Suneet Singh, Niteen Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fld.5236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The nodal integral methods (NIMs) have found widespread use in the nuclear industry for neutron transport problems due to their high accuracy. However, despite considerable development, these methods have limited acceptability among the fluid flow community. One major drawback of these methods is the lack of robust and efficient nonlinear solvers for the algebraic equations resulting from discretization. Since its inception, several modifications have been made to make NIMs more agile, efficient, and accurate. Modified nodal integral method (MNIM) and modified MNIM (M<sup>2</sup>NIM) are the two most recent and efficient versions of the NIM for fluid flow problems. M<sup>2</sup>NIM modifies the MNIM by replacing the current time convective velocity with the previous time convective velocity, leading to faster convergence albeit with reduced accuracy. This work proposes a preconditioned Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov approach for solving the Navier–Stokes equation using MNIM. The Krylov solvers do not generally work well without an appropriate preconditioner. Therefore, M<sup>2</sup>NIM is used here as a preconditioner to accelerate the solution of MNIM. Due to pressure–velocity coupling in the Navier–Stokes equation, developing a quality preconditioner for these equations needs significant effort. The momentum equation is solved using the time-splitting alternate direction implicit method. The velocities obtained from the solution are then used to solve the pressure Poisson equation. The computational results for the Navier–Stokes equation are presented to underscore the advantages of the developed algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"volume\":\"96 2\",\"pages\":\"138-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5236\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
节点积分法(NIMs)因其高精度在核工业的中子输运问题中得到广泛应用。然而,尽管有了长足的发展,这些方法在流体流动领域的可接受性仍然有限。这些方法的一个主要缺点是缺乏稳健高效的非线性求解器来求解离散化产生的代数方程。自诞生以来,人们对 NIM 进行了多次修改,使其更加灵活、高效和精确。修正节点积分法(MNIM)和修正 MNIM(M2NIM)是针对流体流动问题的 NIM 的两个最新高效版本。M2NIM 对 MNIM 进行了修改,将当前时间的对流速度替换为之前时间的对流速度,从而加快了收敛速度,但降低了精度。本研究提出了一种使用 MNIM 求解纳维-斯托克斯方程的无雅各布预处理牛顿-克雷洛夫方法。如果没有适当的预处理器,克雷洛夫求解器一般不能很好地工作。因此,这里使用 M2NIM 作为前置条件器来加速 MNIM 的求解。由于纳维-斯托克斯方程中的压力-速度耦合,为这些方程开发高质量的预处理程序需要付出巨大的努力。动量方程采用时间分割交替方向隐含法求解。然后利用求解得到的速度来求解压力泊松方程。本文介绍了纳维-斯托克斯方程的计算结果,以强调所开发算法的优势。
Physics-based preconditioning of Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov solver for Navier–Stokes equations using nodal integral method
The nodal integral methods (NIMs) have found widespread use in the nuclear industry for neutron transport problems due to their high accuracy. However, despite considerable development, these methods have limited acceptability among the fluid flow community. One major drawback of these methods is the lack of robust and efficient nonlinear solvers for the algebraic equations resulting from discretization. Since its inception, several modifications have been made to make NIMs more agile, efficient, and accurate. Modified nodal integral method (MNIM) and modified MNIM (M2NIM) are the two most recent and efficient versions of the NIM for fluid flow problems. M2NIM modifies the MNIM by replacing the current time convective velocity with the previous time convective velocity, leading to faster convergence albeit with reduced accuracy. This work proposes a preconditioned Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov approach for solving the Navier–Stokes equation using MNIM. The Krylov solvers do not generally work well without an appropriate preconditioner. Therefore, M2NIM is used here as a preconditioner to accelerate the solution of MNIM. Due to pressure–velocity coupling in the Navier–Stokes equation, developing a quality preconditioner for these equations needs significant effort. The momentum equation is solved using the time-splitting alternate direction implicit method. The velocities obtained from the solution are then used to solve the pressure Poisson equation. The computational results for the Navier–Stokes equation are presented to underscore the advantages of the developed algorithm.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction.
Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review.
The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.