实时荧光定量PCR用于非疫区粪类圆线虫感染的诊断和治疗效果监测

Linda J. Wammes, Suzanne A. V. van Asten, Lisette van Lieshout, Els Wessels, Jaco J. Verweij
{"title":"实时荧光定量PCR用于非疫区粪类圆线虫感染的诊断和治疗效果监测","authors":"Linda J. Wammes, Suzanne A. V. van Asten, Lisette van Lieshout, Els Wessels, Jaco J. Verweij","doi":"10.3389/fpara.2023.1277372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Word count: 211 Introduction The laboratory diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis is notoriously difficult. Microscopic diagnosis, even using concentration techniques and repeated sampling, is known to lack sensitivity. Serology depending on the type of test used have shown adequate sensitivity but specificity is generally low. In the present study the performance of S. stercoralis real-time PCR as a routine diagnostic test is evaluated in two different non-endemic settings. Methods Strongyloides stercoralis real-time PCR, serology, and microscopy results with available clinical and anamnestic data were extracted from the laboratory information management systems between August 2005 and December 2022. Results A total of 19179 Strongyloides stercoralis PCR results were retrieved in which in 149 specimens from 103 patients S. stercoralisspecific DNA was detected. Microscopy revealed S. stercoralis larvae in 19 of 36 (53%) PCR positive patients. Whereas serology tested positive in 70 of 74 (94.6%) of all available serum samples of S. stercoralis PCR positive patients and in 61 of 63 (96.8%) when limited to serology results within 6 weeks around the primary PCR-positive specimen. In 79% (38 of 48 patients) the first follow-up feces sample tested PCR negative. Discussion Strongyloides stercoralis real-time PCR showed a valuable diagnostic tool for the detecting and monitoring of S. stercoralis infections and detected additional cases compared to microscopy and serology.","PeriodicalId":73098,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time PCR for diagnosing and monitoring treatment effect of Strongyloides stercoralis infection in a non-endemic setting\",\"authors\":\"Linda J. Wammes, Suzanne A. V. van Asten, Lisette van Lieshout, Els Wessels, Jaco J. Verweij\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpara.2023.1277372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Word count: 211 Introduction The laboratory diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis is notoriously difficult. Microscopic diagnosis, even using concentration techniques and repeated sampling, is known to lack sensitivity. Serology depending on the type of test used have shown adequate sensitivity but specificity is generally low. In the present study the performance of S. stercoralis real-time PCR as a routine diagnostic test is evaluated in two different non-endemic settings. Methods Strongyloides stercoralis real-time PCR, serology, and microscopy results with available clinical and anamnestic data were extracted from the laboratory information management systems between August 2005 and December 2022. Results A total of 19179 Strongyloides stercoralis PCR results were retrieved in which in 149 specimens from 103 patients S. stercoralisspecific DNA was detected. Microscopy revealed S. stercoralis larvae in 19 of 36 (53%) PCR positive patients. Whereas serology tested positive in 70 of 74 (94.6%) of all available serum samples of S. stercoralis PCR positive patients and in 61 of 63 (96.8%) when limited to serology results within 6 weeks around the primary PCR-positive specimen. In 79% (38 of 48 patients) the first follow-up feces sample tested PCR negative. Discussion Strongyloides stercoralis real-time PCR showed a valuable diagnostic tool for the detecting and monitoring of S. stercoralis infections and detected additional cases compared to microscopy and serology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in parasitology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpara.2023.1277372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpara.2023.1277372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粪圆线虫的实验室诊断是出了名的困难。显微镜诊断,即使使用浓度技术和重复采样,已知缺乏灵敏度。根据所使用的测试类型,血清学显示出足够的敏感性,但特异性通常较低。在本研究中,粪球菌实时PCR作为常规诊断测试的性能在两种不同的非流行环境中进行了评估。方法从2005年8月至2022年12月的实验室信息管理系统中提取粪类圆线虫实时荧光定量PCR、血清学和镜检结果以及现有的临床和记忆资料。结果共检获粪圆线虫PCR结果19179条,其中103例患者149份标本检出粪圆线虫特异性DNA。显微镜下36例PCR阳性患者中有19例(53%)发现粪球菌幼虫。然而,在所有可用的粪球菌PCR阳性患者血清样本中,74个血清样本中有70个(94.6%)检测出血清学阳性,而在主要PCR阳性标本周围6周内的血清学结果限制下,63个血清样本中有61个(96.8%)检测出血清学阳性。在79%(48例患者中的38例)的首次随访粪便样本中,PCR检测呈阴性。实时荧光定量PCR是检测和监测粪圆线虫感染的一种有价值的诊断工具,与镜检和血清学相比,检测到更多的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-time PCR for diagnosing and monitoring treatment effect of Strongyloides stercoralis infection in a non-endemic setting
Word count: 211 Introduction The laboratory diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis is notoriously difficult. Microscopic diagnosis, even using concentration techniques and repeated sampling, is known to lack sensitivity. Serology depending on the type of test used have shown adequate sensitivity but specificity is generally low. In the present study the performance of S. stercoralis real-time PCR as a routine diagnostic test is evaluated in two different non-endemic settings. Methods Strongyloides stercoralis real-time PCR, serology, and microscopy results with available clinical and anamnestic data were extracted from the laboratory information management systems between August 2005 and December 2022. Results A total of 19179 Strongyloides stercoralis PCR results were retrieved in which in 149 specimens from 103 patients S. stercoralisspecific DNA was detected. Microscopy revealed S. stercoralis larvae in 19 of 36 (53%) PCR positive patients. Whereas serology tested positive in 70 of 74 (94.6%) of all available serum samples of S. stercoralis PCR positive patients and in 61 of 63 (96.8%) when limited to serology results within 6 weeks around the primary PCR-positive specimen. In 79% (38 of 48 patients) the first follow-up feces sample tested PCR negative. Discussion Strongyloides stercoralis real-time PCR showed a valuable diagnostic tool for the detecting and monitoring of S. stercoralis infections and detected additional cases compared to microscopy and serology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From laboratory to clinical practice: an update of the immunological and molecular tools for neurocysticercosis diagnosis Transcriptome analysis reveals molecular targets of erythrocyte invasion phenotype diversity in natural Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Cameroon Next step towards point-of-care molecular diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis (FGS): evaluation of an instrument-free LAMP procedure In vitro and in vivo antimalarial activities of the ethanol extract of Erythrina sigmoidea stem bark used for the treatment of malaria in the Western Region of Cameroon Genetic variation of the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein in parasite isolates from Homabay County in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1