亚临床圆锥角膜的患病率及其对接受常规、无并发症的年龄相关性白内障摘除的成人的影响

Tu M. Tran, Aman Mittal, Vihar Naik, Priyanka Chhadva, Matthew Wade, Sumit Garg
{"title":"亚临床圆锥角膜的患病率及其对接受常规、无并发症的年龄相关性白内障摘除的成人的影响","authors":"Tu M. Tran, Aman Mittal, Vihar Naik, Priyanka Chhadva, Matthew Wade, Sumit Garg","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2023.1269439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To determine the prevalence of subclinical keratoconus (SKCN) among individuals undergoing routine, uncomplicated age-related cataract surgery and its impact on visual and refractive outcomes. Patient and Methods At a major academic ophthalmology department in the United States, we reviewed records of patients aged 50 years and older who underwent surgery from January 2011 to June 2022. We excluded patients who had poor-quality or unreliable tomographic data, previous corneal surgery, keratorefractive procedures, and significant vision-limiting ocular pathology. We defined SKCN if an eye had a Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia index (BAD-D) ≥1.7, which was based on the results of a meta-analysis of large studies. In addition to the BAD-D cutoff, the eye had to deviate significantly on at least one of seven additional parameters: 1) posterior elevation at thinnest point, 2) index of vertical asymmetry, 3) index of surface variation, 4) total front higher order aberrations, 5) front vertical coma, 6) front secondary vertical coma, 7) back vertical coma. An individual had SKCN if at least one eye met the tomography-based classification and did not have manifest KCN in either eye. Visual and refractive outcomes data were acquired from patients of one experienced cataract surgeon with cases done from July 2021 to June 2022. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Among 5592 eyes from 3828 individuals, the prevalence of SKCN was 24.7% (95% CI, 23.4 – 26.1, 945 individuals), and the prevalence of KCN was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.6 – 2.4, 87 individuals). The prevalence of SKCN did not increase with age and was more prevalent among females and non-white races. Median post-operative month one distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA) and proportion of eyes with improvement in DCVA were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. The proportion of eyes reaching ±0.5 and ±1.0 diopter within the refractive target were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. Conclusion SKCN is highly prevalent and should be detected but is unlikely to have a significant deleterious effect on outcomes in routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery.","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of subclinical keratoconus and impact on adults undergoing routine, uncomplicated age-related cataract extraction\",\"authors\":\"Tu M. Tran, Aman Mittal, Vihar Naik, Priyanka Chhadva, Matthew Wade, Sumit Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fopht.2023.1269439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim To determine the prevalence of subclinical keratoconus (SKCN) among individuals undergoing routine, uncomplicated age-related cataract surgery and its impact on visual and refractive outcomes. Patient and Methods At a major academic ophthalmology department in the United States, we reviewed records of patients aged 50 years and older who underwent surgery from January 2011 to June 2022. We excluded patients who had poor-quality or unreliable tomographic data, previous corneal surgery, keratorefractive procedures, and significant vision-limiting ocular pathology. We defined SKCN if an eye had a Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia index (BAD-D) ≥1.7, which was based on the results of a meta-analysis of large studies. In addition to the BAD-D cutoff, the eye had to deviate significantly on at least one of seven additional parameters: 1) posterior elevation at thinnest point, 2) index of vertical asymmetry, 3) index of surface variation, 4) total front higher order aberrations, 5) front vertical coma, 6) front secondary vertical coma, 7) back vertical coma. An individual had SKCN if at least one eye met the tomography-based classification and did not have manifest KCN in either eye. Visual and refractive outcomes data were acquired from patients of one experienced cataract surgeon with cases done from July 2021 to June 2022. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Among 5592 eyes from 3828 individuals, the prevalence of SKCN was 24.7% (95% CI, 23.4 – 26.1, 945 individuals), and the prevalence of KCN was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.6 – 2.4, 87 individuals). The prevalence of SKCN did not increase with age and was more prevalent among females and non-white races. Median post-operative month one distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA) and proportion of eyes with improvement in DCVA were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. The proportion of eyes reaching ±0.5 and ±1.0 diopter within the refractive target were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. Conclusion SKCN is highly prevalent and should be detected but is unlikely to have a significant deleterious effect on outcomes in routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2023.1269439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2023.1269439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解亚临床圆锥角膜(SKCN)在接受常规、无并发症的年龄相关性白内障手术患者中的患病率及其对视力和屈光结果的影响。患者和方法:在美国一家主要的学术眼科,我们回顾了2011年1月至2022年6月期间接受手术的50岁及以上患者的记录。我们排除了质量差或不可靠的断层扫描数据、既往角膜手术、角膜屈光手术和明显的视力限制眼部病理的患者。我们将SKCN定义为Belin-Ambrósio增强扩张指数(BAD-D)≥1.7,这是基于大型研究的meta分析结果。除了BAD-D的截止点外,眼睛必须在以下七个附加参数中至少有一个显著偏离:1)最薄点后仰角,2)垂直不对称指数,3)表面变异指数,4)总前高阶像差,5)前垂直彗发,6)前二次垂直彗发,7)后垂直彗发。如果至少有一只眼睛符合基于断层扫描的分类,则个体患有SKCN,并且两只眼睛都没有明显的KCN。视力和屈光结果数据来自一位经验丰富的白内障外科医生的患者,这些病例于2021年7月至2022年6月完成。p <0.05. 结果3828例5592只眼中,SKCN患病率为24.7% (95% CI: 23.4 ~ 26.1, 945例),KCN患病率为1.9% (95% CI: 1.6 ~ 2.4, 87例)。SKCN患病率不随年龄增长而增加,在女性和非白种人中更为普遍。正常眼和SKCN眼术后第一个月的中位距离矫正视力(DCVA)和DCVA改善眼的比例相似。正常眼和SKCN眼屈光度达到±0.5和±1.0屈光度的比例相似。结论SKCN发病率高,应及时发现,但不太可能对常规、无并发症的白内障手术结果产生明显的不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of subclinical keratoconus and impact on adults undergoing routine, uncomplicated age-related cataract extraction
Aim To determine the prevalence of subclinical keratoconus (SKCN) among individuals undergoing routine, uncomplicated age-related cataract surgery and its impact on visual and refractive outcomes. Patient and Methods At a major academic ophthalmology department in the United States, we reviewed records of patients aged 50 years and older who underwent surgery from January 2011 to June 2022. We excluded patients who had poor-quality or unreliable tomographic data, previous corneal surgery, keratorefractive procedures, and significant vision-limiting ocular pathology. We defined SKCN if an eye had a Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia index (BAD-D) ≥1.7, which was based on the results of a meta-analysis of large studies. In addition to the BAD-D cutoff, the eye had to deviate significantly on at least one of seven additional parameters: 1) posterior elevation at thinnest point, 2) index of vertical asymmetry, 3) index of surface variation, 4) total front higher order aberrations, 5) front vertical coma, 6) front secondary vertical coma, 7) back vertical coma. An individual had SKCN if at least one eye met the tomography-based classification and did not have manifest KCN in either eye. Visual and refractive outcomes data were acquired from patients of one experienced cataract surgeon with cases done from July 2021 to June 2022. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. Results Among 5592 eyes from 3828 individuals, the prevalence of SKCN was 24.7% (95% CI, 23.4 – 26.1, 945 individuals), and the prevalence of KCN was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.6 – 2.4, 87 individuals). The prevalence of SKCN did not increase with age and was more prevalent among females and non-white races. Median post-operative month one distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA) and proportion of eyes with improvement in DCVA were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. The proportion of eyes reaching ±0.5 and ±1.0 diopter within the refractive target were similar between normal and SKCN eyes. Conclusion SKCN is highly prevalent and should be detected but is unlikely to have a significant deleterious effect on outcomes in routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100. UV light and the ocular lens: a review of exposure models and resulting biomolecular changes. Diagnostic accuracy of a modularized, virtual-reality-based automated pupillometer for detection of relative afferent pupillary defect in unilateral optic neuropathies. Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Large animal model species in pluripotent stem cell therapy research and development for retinal diseases: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1