[牙刷刷洗方法中不同种类牙刷对刷牙压力和牙菌斑去除的影响[5].沿牙刷柄排列不同长度的尼龙刷毛牙刷和不同类型的刷毛尖牙刷]。

M Fukushima, K Kurihara, J Kurogome, K Inadama, A Yageta, Y Shoji, J Suzuki, I Watanabe, M Shiono, T Watanabe
{"title":"[牙刷刷洗方法中不同种类牙刷对刷牙压力和牙菌斑去除的影响[5].沿牙刷柄排列不同长度的尼龙刷毛牙刷和不同类型的刷毛尖牙刷]。","authors":"M Fukushima,&nbsp;K Kurihara,&nbsp;J Kurogome,&nbsp;K Inadama,&nbsp;A Yageta,&nbsp;Y Shoji,&nbsp;J Suzuki,&nbsp;I Watanabe,&nbsp;M Shiono,&nbsp;T Watanabe","doi":"10.2329/perio.31.1197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study (Report 5) was to investigate the effect of difference in the length of toothbrush shank and type of tip of toothbrush bristle on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method. Four kinds of toothbrushes which were different in length of shank (30 mm, 40 mm) and type of bristle tip (round type, tapered type respectively) were used in this study. Referring to the results of our previous reports (1-4), the dimension of new toothbrushes were determined as follows, nylon bristles: 40 mm long and 0.20 mm in diameter, brushing surface: 30 mm long, bristles: 3 rows with 26 tufts, and a straight handle. Twelve subjects participated in this experiment. Plaque scores were measured before and after toothbrushing. Then plaque removal rates were calculated. Toothbrushing pressure was determined using Watanabe's method. The average toothbrushing pressure of the toothbrush with a 40 mm long shank (301.6 +/- 84.1 g/cm2) was higher than that with a 30 mm long shank (294.7 +/- 74.8 g/cm2), and that with a tapered bristle type (316.7 +/- 90.4 g/cm2) was higher than that with a round type bristle (279.6 +/- 61.7 g/cm2). However statistically significant differences were not found among the four toothbrushes in brushing pressure and in plaque removal on total teeth surfaces and on distal surfaces of the most posterior teeth (P less than 0.05; two-way ANOVA).</p>","PeriodicalId":19428,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi","volume":"31 4","pages":"1197-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2329/perio.31.1197","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of different kinds of toothbrushes on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method of toothbrushing (5). Toothbrushes with nylon bristles arranged in different lengths along the toothbrush shank and with different types of toothbrush bristle tip].\",\"authors\":\"M Fukushima,&nbsp;K Kurihara,&nbsp;J Kurogome,&nbsp;K Inadama,&nbsp;A Yageta,&nbsp;Y Shoji,&nbsp;J Suzuki,&nbsp;I Watanabe,&nbsp;M Shiono,&nbsp;T Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.2329/perio.31.1197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study (Report 5) was to investigate the effect of difference in the length of toothbrush shank and type of tip of toothbrush bristle on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method. Four kinds of toothbrushes which were different in length of shank (30 mm, 40 mm) and type of bristle tip (round type, tapered type respectively) were used in this study. Referring to the results of our previous reports (1-4), the dimension of new toothbrushes were determined as follows, nylon bristles: 40 mm long and 0.20 mm in diameter, brushing surface: 30 mm long, bristles: 3 rows with 26 tufts, and a straight handle. Twelve subjects participated in this experiment. Plaque scores were measured before and after toothbrushing. Then plaque removal rates were calculated. Toothbrushing pressure was determined using Watanabe's method. The average toothbrushing pressure of the toothbrush with a 40 mm long shank (301.6 +/- 84.1 g/cm2) was higher than that with a 30 mm long shank (294.7 +/- 74.8 g/cm2), and that with a tapered bristle type (316.7 +/- 90.4 g/cm2) was higher than that with a round type bristle (279.6 +/- 61.7 g/cm2). However statistically significant differences were not found among the four toothbrushes in brushing pressure and in plaque removal on total teeth surfaces and on distal surfaces of the most posterior teeth (P less than 0.05; two-way ANOVA).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"1197-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2329/perio.31.1197\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2329/perio.31.1197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2329/perio.31.1197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究(报告5)的目的是探讨刷法中牙刷柄长度和刷毛尖类型的不同对刷牙压力和牙菌斑去除的影响。采用柄柄长度(30mm、40mm)和刷毛尖类型(圆形、锥形)不同的4种牙刷。参考我们之前的报告结果(1-4),确定新牙刷的尺寸如下:尼龙刷毛:长40mm,直径0.20 mm,刷面:长30mm,刷毛:3排,共26簇,刷柄为直柄。12名受试者参加了本实验。在刷牙前后分别测量牙菌斑评分。然后计算牙菌斑去除率。用渡边法测定刷牙压力。40 mm长柄牙刷的平均刷牙压力(301.6 +/- 84.1 g/cm2)高于30 mm长柄牙刷(294.7 +/- 74.8 g/cm2),锥形刷毛牙刷的平均刷牙压力(316.7 +/- 90.4 g/cm2)高于圆形刷毛牙刷(279.6 +/- 61.7 g/cm2)。但4种牙刷在刷牙压力、总牙面及大部分后牙远端牙面菌斑清除方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05;双向方差分析)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Effect of different kinds of toothbrushes on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method of toothbrushing (5). Toothbrushes with nylon bristles arranged in different lengths along the toothbrush shank and with different types of toothbrush bristle tip].

The purpose of this study (Report 5) was to investigate the effect of difference in the length of toothbrush shank and type of tip of toothbrush bristle on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method. Four kinds of toothbrushes which were different in length of shank (30 mm, 40 mm) and type of bristle tip (round type, tapered type respectively) were used in this study. Referring to the results of our previous reports (1-4), the dimension of new toothbrushes were determined as follows, nylon bristles: 40 mm long and 0.20 mm in diameter, brushing surface: 30 mm long, bristles: 3 rows with 26 tufts, and a straight handle. Twelve subjects participated in this experiment. Plaque scores were measured before and after toothbrushing. Then plaque removal rates were calculated. Toothbrushing pressure was determined using Watanabe's method. The average toothbrushing pressure of the toothbrush with a 40 mm long shank (301.6 +/- 84.1 g/cm2) was higher than that with a 30 mm long shank (294.7 +/- 74.8 g/cm2), and that with a tapered bristle type (316.7 +/- 90.4 g/cm2) was higher than that with a round type bristle (279.6 +/- 61.7 g/cm2). However statistically significant differences were not found among the four toothbrushes in brushing pressure and in plaque removal on total teeth surfaces and on distal surfaces of the most posterior teeth (P less than 0.05; two-way ANOVA).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Experimental studies on morphological changes of microvascular architecture following the free gingival autograft on denuded alveolar bone]. [A study of lipopolysaccharide derived from Bacteroides gingivalis]. [Distribution of enzymatically pathogenic bacteria from periodontal pocket in advancing periodontitis]. [The effect of superoxide dismutase on the inflammation induced by periodontal pathogenic bacteria and wound healing of gingival incision]. [Immunohistochemical localization of the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan in demineralized rat periodontal tissue].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1