Fernando Cavallo, Bill Brubaker, Ellie Bruckner, Sofia Castro
{"title":"戴上虚拟现实(VR)头戴设备获取有效qEEG数据的初步研究","authors":"Fernando Cavallo, Bill Brubaker, Ellie Bruckner, Sofia Castro","doi":"10.15540/nr.10.3.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of virtual reality (VR) therapy is being utilized and promoted for a wide range of treatment applications. Yet, the majority of clinical evidence that supports the efficacy of VR treatment has been established utilizing reports of subjective outcome variables, such as rating scales or a reduction of symptoms reported by the patient. Instead, the present study supports the use of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as a more precise and objective method for assessing treatment efficacy involving the use of VR-based treatments. Although a few studies have attempted to establish physiological evidence from qEEG recordings to strengthen the efficacy of pre-post treatment effects for VR-based treatments, these attempts have been based upon very small sample sizes or case studies. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, prior studies have failed to uniformly account for ingenuine treatment effects that could arise from merely wearing a VR headset while acquiring qEEG. The current preliminary study sought to systematically measure any potential confounding effects that wearing a VR headset could produce by measuring and comparing the baseline qEEG recordings for the eyes-open, resting condition (staring at a dot) with and without the VR headset for 28 participants. The present results revealed very minimal significant differences between the two conditions when analyzed collectively and no significant differences for the male participants. The implications of these findings are discussed and provide preliminary support for confidently reporting qEEG efficacy data involving the use of a VR headset. Additionally, the current study is believed to have successfully established a valid and standardized approach for reliably obtaining active or real-time qEEG data while wearing a VR headset in order to confidently report the physiological effects of VR immersion on electrical brain activity.","PeriodicalId":37439,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRegulation","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Study Investigating the Acquisition of valid qEEG Data While Wearing a Virtual Reality (VR) Headset\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Cavallo, Bill Brubaker, Ellie Bruckner, Sofia Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.15540/nr.10.3.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of virtual reality (VR) therapy is being utilized and promoted for a wide range of treatment applications. Yet, the majority of clinical evidence that supports the efficacy of VR treatment has been established utilizing reports of subjective outcome variables, such as rating scales or a reduction of symptoms reported by the patient. Instead, the present study supports the use of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as a more precise and objective method for assessing treatment efficacy involving the use of VR-based treatments. Although a few studies have attempted to establish physiological evidence from qEEG recordings to strengthen the efficacy of pre-post treatment effects for VR-based treatments, these attempts have been based upon very small sample sizes or case studies. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, prior studies have failed to uniformly account for ingenuine treatment effects that could arise from merely wearing a VR headset while acquiring qEEG. The current preliminary study sought to systematically measure any potential confounding effects that wearing a VR headset could produce by measuring and comparing the baseline qEEG recordings for the eyes-open, resting condition (staring at a dot) with and without the VR headset for 28 participants. The present results revealed very minimal significant differences between the two conditions when analyzed collectively and no significant differences for the male participants. The implications of these findings are discussed and provide preliminary support for confidently reporting qEEG efficacy data involving the use of a VR headset. Additionally, the current study is believed to have successfully established a valid and standardized approach for reliably obtaining active or real-time qEEG data while wearing a VR headset in order to confidently report the physiological effects of VR immersion on electrical brain activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.10.3.170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRegulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.10.3.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Preliminary Study Investigating the Acquisition of valid qEEG Data While Wearing a Virtual Reality (VR) Headset
The use of virtual reality (VR) therapy is being utilized and promoted for a wide range of treatment applications. Yet, the majority of clinical evidence that supports the efficacy of VR treatment has been established utilizing reports of subjective outcome variables, such as rating scales or a reduction of symptoms reported by the patient. Instead, the present study supports the use of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as a more precise and objective method for assessing treatment efficacy involving the use of VR-based treatments. Although a few studies have attempted to establish physiological evidence from qEEG recordings to strengthen the efficacy of pre-post treatment effects for VR-based treatments, these attempts have been based upon very small sample sizes or case studies. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, prior studies have failed to uniformly account for ingenuine treatment effects that could arise from merely wearing a VR headset while acquiring qEEG. The current preliminary study sought to systematically measure any potential confounding effects that wearing a VR headset could produce by measuring and comparing the baseline qEEG recordings for the eyes-open, resting condition (staring at a dot) with and without the VR headset for 28 participants. The present results revealed very minimal significant differences between the two conditions when analyzed collectively and no significant differences for the male participants. The implications of these findings are discussed and provide preliminary support for confidently reporting qEEG efficacy data involving the use of a VR headset. Additionally, the current study is believed to have successfully established a valid and standardized approach for reliably obtaining active or real-time qEEG data while wearing a VR headset in order to confidently report the physiological effects of VR immersion on electrical brain activity.
期刊介绍:
NeuroRegulation is a peer-reviewed journal providing an integrated, multidisciplinary perspective on clinically relevant research, treatment, reviews, and public policy for neuroregulation and neurotherapy. NeuroRegulation publishes important findings in these fields with a focus on electroencephalography (EEG), neurofeedback (EEG biofeedback), quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), psychophysiology, biofeedback, heart rate variability, photobiomodulation, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Simulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS); with a focus on treatment of psychiatric, mind-body, and neurological disorders. In addition to research findings and reviews, it is important to stress that publication of case reports is always useful in furthering the advancement of an intervention for both clinical and normative functioning. We strive for high quality and interesting empirical topics presented in a rigorous and scholarly manner. The journal draws from expertise inside and outside of the International Society for Neurofeedback & Research (ISNR) to deliver material which integrates the diverse aspects of the field, to include: *basic science *clinical aspects *treatment evaluation *philosophy *training and certification issues *technology and equipment