Holloway, Philip, Marshall, Philip J., Verma, Aprajita, More, Anupreeta, Cañameras, Raoul, Jaelani, Anton T., Ishida, Yuichiro, Wong, Kenneth C.
{"title":"广域观测时代强透镜发现的贝叶斯方法","authors":"Holloway, Philip, Marshall, Philip J., Verma, Aprajita, More, Anupreeta, Cañameras, Raoul, Jaelani, Anton T., Ishida, Yuichiro, Wong, Kenneth C.","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arrival of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), Euclid-Wide and Roman wide area sensitive surveys will herald a new era in strong lens science in which the number of strong lenses known is expected to rise from $\\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ to $\\mathcal{O}(10^5)$. However, current lens-finding methods still require time-consuming follow-up visual inspection by strong-lens experts to remove false positives which is only set to increase with these surveys. In this work we demonstrate a range of methods to produce calibrated probabilities to help determine the veracity of any given lens candidate. To do this we use the classifications from citizen science and multiple neural networks for galaxies selected from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. Our methodology is not restricted to particular classifier types and could be applied to any strong lens classifier which produces quantitative scores. Using these calibrated probabilities, we generate an ensemble classifier, combining citizen science and neural network lens finders. We find such an ensemble can provide improved classification over the individual classifiers. We find a false positive rate of $10^{-3}$ can be achieved with a completeness of $46\\%$, compared to $34\\%$ for the best individual classifier. Given the large number of galaxy-galaxy strong lenses anticipated in LSST, such improvement would still produce significant numbers of false positives, in which case using calibrated probabilities will be essential for population analysis of large populations of lenses.","PeriodicalId":496270,"journal":{"name":"arXiv (Cornell University)","volume":"108 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Bayesian Approach to Strong Lens Finding in the Era of Wide-area\\n Surveys\",\"authors\":\"Holloway, Philip, Marshall, Philip J., Verma, Aprajita, More, Anupreeta, Cañameras, Raoul, Jaelani, Anton T., Ishida, Yuichiro, Wong, Kenneth C.\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The arrival of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), Euclid-Wide and Roman wide area sensitive surveys will herald a new era in strong lens science in which the number of strong lenses known is expected to rise from $\\\\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ to $\\\\mathcal{O}(10^5)$. However, current lens-finding methods still require time-consuming follow-up visual inspection by strong-lens experts to remove false positives which is only set to increase with these surveys. In this work we demonstrate a range of methods to produce calibrated probabilities to help determine the veracity of any given lens candidate. To do this we use the classifications from citizen science and multiple neural networks for galaxies selected from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. Our methodology is not restricted to particular classifier types and could be applied to any strong lens classifier which produces quantitative scores. Using these calibrated probabilities, we generate an ensemble classifier, combining citizen science and neural network lens finders. We find such an ensemble can provide improved classification over the individual classifiers. We find a false positive rate of $10^{-3}$ can be achieved with a completeness of $46\\\\%$, compared to $34\\\\%$ for the best individual classifier. Given the large number of galaxy-galaxy strong lenses anticipated in LSST, such improvement would still produce significant numbers of false positives, in which case using calibrated probabilities will be essential for population analysis of large populations of lenses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv (Cornell University)\",\"volume\":\"108 26\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv (Cornell University)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv (Cornell University)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Vera C. Rubin天文台的时空遗产巡天(LSST),欧几里得宽和罗马广域敏感巡天的到来,将宣告强透镜科学的新时代,其中已知的强透镜数量预计将从$\mathcal{O}(10^3)$增加到$\mathcal{O}(10^5)$。然而,目前的透镜寻找方法仍然需要由强透镜专家进行耗时的后续目视检查,以消除假阳性,而假阳性只会随着这些调查而增加。在这项工作中,我们展示了一系列方法来产生校准概率,以帮助确定任何给定候选透镜的准确性。为了做到这一点,我们使用了来自公民科学和多个神经网络的分类,这些分类是从超级超级相机(HSC)调查中选择的星系。我们的方法不局限于特定的分类器类型,可以应用于任何产生定量分数的强透镜分类器。使用这些校准的概率,我们生成了一个集成分类器,结合了公民科学和神经网络寻镜器。我们发现这样的集成可以提供比单个分类器更好的分类。我们发现假阳性率为$10^{-3}$,完备性为$46\%$,而最佳单个分类器的完备性为$34\%$。考虑到LSST中预期的大量星系-星系强透镜,这种改进仍然会产生大量的假阳性,在这种情况下,使用校准的概率对于大量透镜的种群分析是必不可少的。
A Bayesian Approach to Strong Lens Finding in the Era of Wide-area
Surveys
The arrival of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), Euclid-Wide and Roman wide area sensitive surveys will herald a new era in strong lens science in which the number of strong lenses known is expected to rise from $\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ to $\mathcal{O}(10^5)$. However, current lens-finding methods still require time-consuming follow-up visual inspection by strong-lens experts to remove false positives which is only set to increase with these surveys. In this work we demonstrate a range of methods to produce calibrated probabilities to help determine the veracity of any given lens candidate. To do this we use the classifications from citizen science and multiple neural networks for galaxies selected from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. Our methodology is not restricted to particular classifier types and could be applied to any strong lens classifier which produces quantitative scores. Using these calibrated probabilities, we generate an ensemble classifier, combining citizen science and neural network lens finders. We find such an ensemble can provide improved classification over the individual classifiers. We find a false positive rate of $10^{-3}$ can be achieved with a completeness of $46\%$, compared to $34\%$ for the best individual classifier. Given the large number of galaxy-galaxy strong lenses anticipated in LSST, such improvement would still produce significant numbers of false positives, in which case using calibrated probabilities will be essential for population analysis of large populations of lenses.