广域观测时代强透镜发现的贝叶斯方法

Holloway, Philip, Marshall, Philip J., Verma, Aprajita, More, Anupreeta, Cañameras, Raoul, Jaelani, Anton T., Ishida, Yuichiro, Wong, Kenneth C.
{"title":"广域观测时代强透镜发现的贝叶斯方法","authors":"Holloway, Philip, Marshall, Philip J., Verma, Aprajita, More, Anupreeta, Cañameras, Raoul, Jaelani, Anton T., Ishida, Yuichiro, Wong, Kenneth C.","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arrival of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), Euclid-Wide and Roman wide area sensitive surveys will herald a new era in strong lens science in which the number of strong lenses known is expected to rise from $\\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ to $\\mathcal{O}(10^5)$. However, current lens-finding methods still require time-consuming follow-up visual inspection by strong-lens experts to remove false positives which is only set to increase with these surveys. In this work we demonstrate a range of methods to produce calibrated probabilities to help determine the veracity of any given lens candidate. To do this we use the classifications from citizen science and multiple neural networks for galaxies selected from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. Our methodology is not restricted to particular classifier types and could be applied to any strong lens classifier which produces quantitative scores. Using these calibrated probabilities, we generate an ensemble classifier, combining citizen science and neural network lens finders. We find such an ensemble can provide improved classification over the individual classifiers. We find a false positive rate of $10^{-3}$ can be achieved with a completeness of $46\\%$, compared to $34\\%$ for the best individual classifier. Given the large number of galaxy-galaxy strong lenses anticipated in LSST, such improvement would still produce significant numbers of false positives, in which case using calibrated probabilities will be essential for population analysis of large populations of lenses.","PeriodicalId":496270,"journal":{"name":"arXiv (Cornell University)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Bayesian Approach to Strong Lens Finding in the Era of Wide-area\\n Surveys\",\"authors\":\"Holloway, Philip, Marshall, Philip J., Verma, Aprajita, More, Anupreeta, Cañameras, Raoul, Jaelani, Anton T., Ishida, Yuichiro, Wong, Kenneth C.\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The arrival of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), Euclid-Wide and Roman wide area sensitive surveys will herald a new era in strong lens science in which the number of strong lenses known is expected to rise from $\\\\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ to $\\\\mathcal{O}(10^5)$. However, current lens-finding methods still require time-consuming follow-up visual inspection by strong-lens experts to remove false positives which is only set to increase with these surveys. In this work we demonstrate a range of methods to produce calibrated probabilities to help determine the veracity of any given lens candidate. To do this we use the classifications from citizen science and multiple neural networks for galaxies selected from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. Our methodology is not restricted to particular classifier types and could be applied to any strong lens classifier which produces quantitative scores. Using these calibrated probabilities, we generate an ensemble classifier, combining citizen science and neural network lens finders. We find such an ensemble can provide improved classification over the individual classifiers. We find a false positive rate of $10^{-3}$ can be achieved with a completeness of $46\\\\%$, compared to $34\\\\%$ for the best individual classifier. Given the large number of galaxy-galaxy strong lenses anticipated in LSST, such improvement would still produce significant numbers of false positives, in which case using calibrated probabilities will be essential for population analysis of large populations of lenses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv (Cornell University)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv (Cornell University)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv (Cornell University)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.07455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Vera C. Rubin天文台的时空遗产巡天(LSST),欧几里得宽和罗马广域敏感巡天的到来,将宣告强透镜科学的新时代,其中已知的强透镜数量预计将从$\mathcal{O}(10^3)$增加到$\mathcal{O}(10^5)$。然而,目前的透镜寻找方法仍然需要由强透镜专家进行耗时的后续目视检查,以消除假阳性,而假阳性只会随着这些调查而增加。在这项工作中,我们展示了一系列方法来产生校准概率,以帮助确定任何给定候选透镜的准确性。为了做到这一点,我们使用了来自公民科学和多个神经网络的分类,这些分类是从超级超级相机(HSC)调查中选择的星系。我们的方法不局限于特定的分类器类型,可以应用于任何产生定量分数的强透镜分类器。使用这些校准的概率,我们生成了一个集成分类器,结合了公民科学和神经网络寻镜器。我们发现这样的集成可以提供比单个分类器更好的分类。我们发现假阳性率为$10^{-3}$,完备性为$46\%$,而最佳单个分类器的完备性为$34\%$。考虑到LSST中预期的大量星系-星系强透镜,这种改进仍然会产生大量的假阳性,在这种情况下,使用校准的概率对于大量透镜的种群分析是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Bayesian Approach to Strong Lens Finding in the Era of Wide-area Surveys
The arrival of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), Euclid-Wide and Roman wide area sensitive surveys will herald a new era in strong lens science in which the number of strong lenses known is expected to rise from $\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ to $\mathcal{O}(10^5)$. However, current lens-finding methods still require time-consuming follow-up visual inspection by strong-lens experts to remove false positives which is only set to increase with these surveys. In this work we demonstrate a range of methods to produce calibrated probabilities to help determine the veracity of any given lens candidate. To do this we use the classifications from citizen science and multiple neural networks for galaxies selected from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. Our methodology is not restricted to particular classifier types and could be applied to any strong lens classifier which produces quantitative scores. Using these calibrated probabilities, we generate an ensemble classifier, combining citizen science and neural network lens finders. We find such an ensemble can provide improved classification over the individual classifiers. We find a false positive rate of $10^{-3}$ can be achieved with a completeness of $46\%$, compared to $34\%$ for the best individual classifier. Given the large number of galaxy-galaxy strong lenses anticipated in LSST, such improvement would still produce significant numbers of false positives, in which case using calibrated probabilities will be essential for population analysis of large populations of lenses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CCD Photometry of the Globular Cluster NGC 5897 The Distribution of Sandpile Groups of Random Graphs with their Pairings CLiF-VQA: Enhancing Video Quality Assessment by Incorporating High-Level Semantic Information related to Human Feelings Full-dry Flipping Transfer Method for van der Waals Heterostructure Code-Aided Channel Estimation in LDPC-Coded MIMO Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1