以现状为名:1955-1966年的美国和朝鲜半岛统一问题

D. A. Sadakov
{"title":"以现状为名:1955-1966年的美国和朝鲜半岛统一问题","authors":"D. A. Sadakov","doi":"10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-60-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the U.S. approaches to the Korean question in the decade between the failure of the 1954 Geneva Conference, the entry into force of the U.S.–South Korea mutual defense treaty and the establishment of a new status quo in the region, and the beginning of the conflict in the Korean DMZ of 1966–1969. During this period, the Americans insisted that only the Republic of Korea, established in 1948 with the direct UN involvement, was the only legitimate regime on the peninsula. They allowed Korean unification only in the format of North Korea's accession to the Republic of Korea. The evolution of American policy in the region in the context of the change of political regimes in the south of the country and the transformation of North Korean tactics to restore the territorial unity of Korea are discussed. In general, during the period under review, the Americans quite effectively resisted the DPRK's attempts to put the issue of restoring Korean unity on the international agenda in a constructive way. The UN acted as a tool for legitimizing the U.S. military presence in the region, while the Korean Unification and Restoration Commission in fact merely broadcasted South Korea’s official point of view on events. On the other hand, the contradictions between real U.S. policy and Washington's articulated support for Korean unity discredited the American position in the eyes of the southerners. The Communists did not doze off, systematically working to strengthen their position in the UN. Under these circumstances, by the second half of the 1960s, the U.S. position on the Korean issue at the UN was in dire need of modernization.","PeriodicalId":41257,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IN THE NAME OF THE STATUS QUO: THE U.S. AND THE PROBLEM OF KOREAN REUNIFICATION IN 1955–1966\",\"authors\":\"D. A. Sadakov\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-60-69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the U.S. approaches to the Korean question in the decade between the failure of the 1954 Geneva Conference, the entry into force of the U.S.–South Korea mutual defense treaty and the establishment of a new status quo in the region, and the beginning of the conflict in the Korean DMZ of 1966–1969. During this period, the Americans insisted that only the Republic of Korea, established in 1948 with the direct UN involvement, was the only legitimate regime on the peninsula. They allowed Korean unification only in the format of North Korea's accession to the Republic of Korea. The evolution of American policy in the region in the context of the change of political regimes in the south of the country and the transformation of North Korean tactics to restore the territorial unity of Korea are discussed. In general, during the period under review, the Americans quite effectively resisted the DPRK's attempts to put the issue of restoring Korean unity on the international agenda in a constructive way. The UN acted as a tool for legitimizing the U.S. military presence in the region, while the Korean Unification and Restoration Commission in fact merely broadcasted South Korea’s official point of view on events. On the other hand, the contradictions between real U.S. policy and Washington's articulated support for Korean unity discredited the American position in the eyes of the southerners. The Communists did not doze off, systematically working to strengthen their position in the UN. Under these circumstances, by the second half of the 1960s, the U.S. position on the Korean issue at the UN was in dire need of modernization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-60-69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-60-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章考察了从1954年日内瓦会议失败、美韩共同防御条约生效并在该地区建立新现状到1966年至1969年朝鲜非军事区冲突开始的十年间,美国处理朝鲜问题的方法。在此期间,美国坚持认为,只有1948年在联合国直接参与下成立的大韩民国才是朝鲜半岛上唯一的合法政权。他们只允许朝鲜以加入大韩民国的形式统一。本文讨论了在韩国南部政权更迭和朝鲜为恢复朝鲜领土统一而改变策略的背景下,美国在该地区政策的演变。总的来说,在本报告所述期间,美国相当有效地抵制了朝鲜以建设性方式将恢复朝鲜统一问题列入国际议程的企图。联合国充当了使美国在该地区军事存在合法化的工具,而韩国统一复兴委员会实际上只是传播了韩国对事件的官方观点。另一方面,美国的实际政策与华盛顿对朝鲜统一的明确支持之间的矛盾,使美国在南方人眼中的地位失去了信誉。共产党人没有打盹,系统地努力加强他们在联合国的地位。在这种情况下,到20世纪60年代后半期,美国在联合国的朝鲜问题立场急需现代化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IN THE NAME OF THE STATUS QUO: THE U.S. AND THE PROBLEM OF KOREAN REUNIFICATION IN 1955–1966
The article examines the U.S. approaches to the Korean question in the decade between the failure of the 1954 Geneva Conference, the entry into force of the U.S.–South Korea mutual defense treaty and the establishment of a new status quo in the region, and the beginning of the conflict in the Korean DMZ of 1966–1969. During this period, the Americans insisted that only the Republic of Korea, established in 1948 with the direct UN involvement, was the only legitimate regime on the peninsula. They allowed Korean unification only in the format of North Korea's accession to the Republic of Korea. The evolution of American policy in the region in the context of the change of political regimes in the south of the country and the transformation of North Korean tactics to restore the territorial unity of Korea are discussed. In general, during the period under review, the Americans quite effectively resisted the DPRK's attempts to put the issue of restoring Korean unity on the international agenda in a constructive way. The UN acted as a tool for legitimizing the U.S. military presence in the region, while the Korean Unification and Restoration Commission in fact merely broadcasted South Korea’s official point of view on events. On the other hand, the contradictions between real U.S. policy and Washington's articulated support for Korean unity discredited the American position in the eyes of the southerners. The Communists did not doze off, systematically working to strengthen their position in the UN. Under these circumstances, by the second half of the 1960s, the U.S. position on the Korean issue at the UN was in dire need of modernization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
«СОЦИАЛДЫК ПАТОЛОГИЯ» ТҮШҮНҮГҮНҮН ЖАНА ФОРМАЛАРЫНЫН ИЗИЛДЕНИШИ ААЛАМДАШУУ ШАРТЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫКТАРДЫН ЖАРАНДЫК ИДЕНТТҮҮЛҮГҮ: УЧУРДАГЫ АБАЛЫ ЖАНА БАГЫТТАРЫ КЫРГЫЗСТАНДАГЫ ОРУС ЧИРКӨӨСҮНҮН ТАРЫХЫ ЖАНА БҮГҮНКҮ КҮНДӨГҮ АБАЛЫ (АКСЫ РАЙОНУНУН ЖЕРГЕ-ТАЛ АЙЫЛЫНЫН МИСАЛЫНДА) ОТРАЖЕНИЕ ИСТОРИИ ХЛОПКОВОДСТВА В АРХИВАХ ТОРГОВЫХ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЙ ТУРКЕСТАНСКОГО КРАЯ (НА ПРИМЕРЕ КОЛОНИАЛЬНОГО ПЕРИОДА) ЭГЕМЕНДҮҮЛҮК ЖЫЛДАРЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫН «ЛЕГЕНДАРЛУУ» ПАРЛАМЕНТИНИН – ЖОГОРКУ КЕҢЕШИНИН КАЛЫПТАНЫШЫ ЖАНА АНЫН МАМЛЕКЕТТИК-УКУКТУК РОЛУ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1