选择性门诊手术中使用I-GEL对地氟醚和七氟醚术后恢复情况的比较研究

Suprotik Paul, Mousumi Saikia, Sushil Kumar Nayak, Swarup Dutta, Chaitali Biswas
{"title":"选择性门诊手术中使用I-GEL对地氟醚和七氟醚术后恢复情况的比较研究","authors":"Suprotik Paul, Mousumi Saikia, Sushil Kumar Nayak, Swarup Dutta, Chaitali Biswas","doi":"10.3126/jcmsn.v19i2.48661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In providing general anesthesia for ambulatory surgery, the goal is to achieve optimal surgical conditions while ensuring a rapid early recovery without side effects. Desflurane and sevoflurane are proven as effective ambulatory inhalational anesthetic agents. The aim of this research is to investigate and compared the hemodynamic stability, postoperative outcome and airway responses in elective ambulatory surgeries in patients receiving anesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane using I-Gel supraglottic airway.Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted involving 60 patients of age 18 – 50 years undergoing ambulatory surgeries under general anesthesia, randomly allocated into 2 equal groups receiving desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S) for maintenance of anesthesia with suitable size I-Gel. Patients were monitored for hemodynamic parameters and postoperative recovery profile using fast track criteria (FTC) score at different time intervals. Pearson’s Chi Square test and Mann- Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.Results: The mean time taken for postoperative recovery characteristics were significantly lower in Group D than Group S (p<0.001).The FTC score was significantly higher (p<0.001) in Group D than Group S at all-time intervals for 30 minutes. The requirement of additional analgesics was 46.7% in Group D and 60% in Group S (p>0.301) and that of antiemetic was 30% in Group D and 26.67% in Group S (p>0.774).Conclusions: Desflurane showed superior postoperative recovery characteristics and better FTC score without any increase in adverse airway events than sevoflurane.","PeriodicalId":15436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Postoperative Recovery Profiles of Desflurane and Sevoflurane Using I-GEL in Elective Ambulatory Surgeries\",\"authors\":\"Suprotik Paul, Mousumi Saikia, Sushil Kumar Nayak, Swarup Dutta, Chaitali Biswas\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/jcmsn.v19i2.48661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In providing general anesthesia for ambulatory surgery, the goal is to achieve optimal surgical conditions while ensuring a rapid early recovery without side effects. Desflurane and sevoflurane are proven as effective ambulatory inhalational anesthetic agents. The aim of this research is to investigate and compared the hemodynamic stability, postoperative outcome and airway responses in elective ambulatory surgeries in patients receiving anesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane using I-Gel supraglottic airway.Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted involving 60 patients of age 18 – 50 years undergoing ambulatory surgeries under general anesthesia, randomly allocated into 2 equal groups receiving desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S) for maintenance of anesthesia with suitable size I-Gel. Patients were monitored for hemodynamic parameters and postoperative recovery profile using fast track criteria (FTC) score at different time intervals. Pearson’s Chi Square test and Mann- Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.Results: The mean time taken for postoperative recovery characteristics were significantly lower in Group D than Group S (p<0.001).The FTC score was significantly higher (p<0.001) in Group D than Group S at all-time intervals for 30 minutes. The requirement of additional analgesics was 46.7% in Group D and 60% in Group S (p>0.301) and that of antiemetic was 30% in Group D and 26.67% in Group S (p>0.774).Conclusions: Desflurane showed superior postoperative recovery characteristics and better FTC score without any increase in adverse airway events than sevoflurane.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v19i2.48661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v19i2.48661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在为门诊手术提供全身麻醉时,目标是在确保快速早期恢复无副作用的同时达到最佳手术条件。地氟醚和七氟醚被证明是有效的动态吸入麻醉剂。本研究的目的是调查和比较I-Gel声门上气道麻醉下地氟醚或七氟醚麻醉患者在选择性门诊手术中的血流动力学稳定性、术后预后和气道反应。方法:对60例18 ~ 50岁门诊全麻手术患者进行前瞻性观察性研究,随机分为2组,分别给予地氟醚(D组)和七氟醚(S组)适当大小的I-Gel维持麻醉。采用快速通道标准(FTC)评分,在不同的时间间隔监测患者的血流动力学参数和术后恢复情况。采用皮尔逊卡方检验和Mann- Whitney U检验进行统计分析。结果:D组术后恢复特征所需的平均时间显著低于S组(p<0.001)。在30分钟的时间间隔内,D组的FTC评分显著高于S组(p<0.001)。D组和S组对镇痛药的额外需求分别为46.7%和60% (p>0.301),止吐药的额外需求分别为30%和26.67% (p>0.774)。结论:与七氟醚相比,地氟醚具有更好的术后恢复特征和更好的FTC评分,且气道不良事件没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study on Postoperative Recovery Profiles of Desflurane and Sevoflurane Using I-GEL in Elective Ambulatory Surgeries
Introduction: In providing general anesthesia for ambulatory surgery, the goal is to achieve optimal surgical conditions while ensuring a rapid early recovery without side effects. Desflurane and sevoflurane are proven as effective ambulatory inhalational anesthetic agents. The aim of this research is to investigate and compared the hemodynamic stability, postoperative outcome and airway responses in elective ambulatory surgeries in patients receiving anesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane using I-Gel supraglottic airway.Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted involving 60 patients of age 18 – 50 years undergoing ambulatory surgeries under general anesthesia, randomly allocated into 2 equal groups receiving desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S) for maintenance of anesthesia with suitable size I-Gel. Patients were monitored for hemodynamic parameters and postoperative recovery profile using fast track criteria (FTC) score at different time intervals. Pearson’s Chi Square test and Mann- Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.Results: The mean time taken for postoperative recovery characteristics were significantly lower in Group D than Group S (p<0.001).The FTC score was significantly higher (p<0.001) in Group D than Group S at all-time intervals for 30 minutes. The requirement of additional analgesics was 46.7% in Group D and 60% in Group S (p>0.301) and that of antiemetic was 30% in Group D and 26.67% in Group S (p>0.774).Conclusions: Desflurane showed superior postoperative recovery characteristics and better FTC score without any increase in adverse airway events than sevoflurane.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parental Satisfaction Regarding Online Education of Their Children During COVID-19 Pandemic Blood Pressure and Hematoma Expansion in Hemorrhagic Stroke Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower Calyceal Stones of ≤ 2 cm Potential Nephrotoxic Sequel of the Kidney Following Exposure to Turmeric Extract in Adult Wistar Rats Clinical Psychopathology During Covid-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1