声音的三位一体:在参与性进程中提高信任和决策基础的框架

IF 4.4 4区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environmental Planning and Management Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1080/09640568.2023.2238126
Susan L. Senecah
{"title":"声音的三位一体:在参与性进程中提高信任和决策基础的框架","authors":"Susan L. Senecah","doi":"10.1080/09640568.2023.2238126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractCollaborative processes are increasingly required, familiar, and expected but desire and enthusiasm do not produce competency or confidence, leading to frustration, hesitancy, distrust on all sides, and continued calls for “voice.” Initially introduced to the environmental communication community in 2004, Senecah’s Trinity of Voice is a practical framework based on small group dynamics scaled to community level. Its environmental communication dimensions of Access, Civic Standing, and Influence optimize the potential for trust-rich relationships that are key for effective collaborative processes but are difficult to build and sustain, especially in situations that are complex and/or pulsing with contentiousness. At the 20-year mark, this article revisits the TOV against the contemporary literature on trust; reviews critiques and diverse applications of it; and assesses whether it still offers practical value for designing, diagnosing, and improving collaborative processes to address environmental planning and management situations.Keywords: Environmental communicationcollaborationtrustprocess AcknowledgementsTo the anonymous reviewers of the draft manuscript who provided insightful and helpful suggestions for improvement.Disclosure statementThe author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.","PeriodicalId":48149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","volume":"55 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Trinity of Voice: a framework to improve trust and ground decision making in participatory processes\",\"authors\":\"Susan L. Senecah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09640568.2023.2238126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractCollaborative processes are increasingly required, familiar, and expected but desire and enthusiasm do not produce competency or confidence, leading to frustration, hesitancy, distrust on all sides, and continued calls for “voice.” Initially introduced to the environmental communication community in 2004, Senecah’s Trinity of Voice is a practical framework based on small group dynamics scaled to community level. Its environmental communication dimensions of Access, Civic Standing, and Influence optimize the potential for trust-rich relationships that are key for effective collaborative processes but are difficult to build and sustain, especially in situations that are complex and/or pulsing with contentiousness. At the 20-year mark, this article revisits the TOV against the contemporary literature on trust; reviews critiques and diverse applications of it; and assesses whether it still offers practical value for designing, diagnosing, and improving collaborative processes to address environmental planning and management situations.Keywords: Environmental communicationcollaborationtrustprocess AcknowledgementsTo the anonymous reviewers of the draft manuscript who provided insightful and helpful suggestions for improvement.Disclosure statementThe author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\"55 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2238126\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2238126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要协作过程越来越需要、熟悉和期望,但是欲望和热情并不能产生能力或信心,导致各方的挫折、犹豫、不信任,以及对“声音”的持续呼唤。Senecah的“声音三位一体”(Trinity of Voice)于2004年首次引入环境传播界,是一个基于小规模群体动态的实用框架,可扩展到社区层面。它的环境传播维度——获取、公民地位和影响力——优化了建立信任丰富关系的潜力,这种关系是有效协作过程的关键,但难以建立和维持,特别是在复杂和/或充满争议的情况下。在20周年之际,本文重新审视TOV对当代文学的信任;回顾了对它的批评和各种应用;并评估它是否仍然为设计、诊断和改进协作过程提供实用价值,以解决环境规划和管理情况。关键词:环境传播;协作;信任过程感谢原稿的匿名审稿人,他们为我们的改进提供了有见地和有益的建议。披露声明作者声明在本文的研究、作者身份和/或发表方面没有潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Trinity of Voice: a framework to improve trust and ground decision making in participatory processes
AbstractCollaborative processes are increasingly required, familiar, and expected but desire and enthusiasm do not produce competency or confidence, leading to frustration, hesitancy, distrust on all sides, and continued calls for “voice.” Initially introduced to the environmental communication community in 2004, Senecah’s Trinity of Voice is a practical framework based on small group dynamics scaled to community level. Its environmental communication dimensions of Access, Civic Standing, and Influence optimize the potential for trust-rich relationships that are key for effective collaborative processes but are difficult to build and sustain, especially in situations that are complex and/or pulsing with contentiousness. At the 20-year mark, this article revisits the TOV against the contemporary literature on trust; reviews critiques and diverse applications of it; and assesses whether it still offers practical value for designing, diagnosing, and improving collaborative processes to address environmental planning and management situations.Keywords: Environmental communicationcollaborationtrustprocess AcknowledgementsTo the anonymous reviewers of the draft manuscript who provided insightful and helpful suggestions for improvement.Disclosure statementThe author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management has already established itself as a leading forum for up-to-date scholarly but accessible papers on all aspects of environmental planning and management. With contributions from leading international authors, the Journal publishes influential, high quality papers -an essential feature whether you are a subscriber, reader, contributor or all three. The Editors and International Editorial Advisory Board are drawn from around the world and are committed to encouraging researchers and practitioners to contribute to multidisciplinary and international debate in the field. The central aim is to focus on the integrated planning and management of the environment.
期刊最新文献
Heroes for nature: understanding childhood nature experiences in motivating action for nature Analysis of the spatial spillover effect of electricity generation from renewable energy on carbon emissions: based on empirical evidence from Chinese provinces and cities Landscape-based spatial energy planning: minimization of renewables footprint in the energy transition Community-based incentive coordination in payments for ecosystem services: China’s Wolong Nature Reserve Relevance of ecosystem services and disservices from green infrastructure perceived by the inhabitants of two Portuguese cities dealing with climate change: implications for environmental and intersectional justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1