{"title":"新手工程师vs机器:用功能结构模型比较人工神经网络预测和学生对市场价格的估计","authors":"Apurva Patel, Joshua D. Summers","doi":"10.1080/09544828.2023.2271772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper investigates the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to model human behaviour in early-stage engineering design; specifically, by comparing the predictive capability of ANNs and engineering novices. The comparison is between ‘crowds' of ANNs and humans. Function structure models of fifteen products are used as input for prediction. Additionally, the type of information provided is varied between topology information and vocabulary information. Prediction accuracy is compared, with the results showing that ANN crowd performs comparably to the novice estimates. However, students are more precise with their predictions. Moreover, student confidence in predictions is analyzed, and results suggest that students have low to moderate confidence in their predictions. Confidence increased with the addition of vocabulary information. Finally, limitations and future work are discussed, with research questions presented for subsequent research. This work motivates future studies on crowds, both human and virtual and the cost-benefits associated with collective intelligence.KEYWORDS: Wisdom of the crowdANN Crowdfunction structuredeep learningmarket value prediction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 https://design.engr.oregonstate.edu/repo.","PeriodicalId":50207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design","volume":"34 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novice engineer vs. machine: comparing artificial neural network predictions with student estimates of market price using function structure models\",\"authors\":\"Apurva Patel, Joshua D. Summers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09544828.2023.2271772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis paper investigates the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to model human behaviour in early-stage engineering design; specifically, by comparing the predictive capability of ANNs and engineering novices. The comparison is between ‘crowds' of ANNs and humans. Function structure models of fifteen products are used as input for prediction. Additionally, the type of information provided is varied between topology information and vocabulary information. Prediction accuracy is compared, with the results showing that ANN crowd performs comparably to the novice estimates. However, students are more precise with their predictions. Moreover, student confidence in predictions is analyzed, and results suggest that students have low to moderate confidence in their predictions. Confidence increased with the addition of vocabulary information. Finally, limitations and future work are discussed, with research questions presented for subsequent research. This work motivates future studies on crowds, both human and virtual and the cost-benefits associated with collective intelligence.KEYWORDS: Wisdom of the crowdANN Crowdfunction structuredeep learningmarket value prediction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 https://design.engr.oregonstate.edu/repo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Design\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2023.2271772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2023.2271772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novice engineer vs. machine: comparing artificial neural network predictions with student estimates of market price using function structure models
AbstractThis paper investigates the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to model human behaviour in early-stage engineering design; specifically, by comparing the predictive capability of ANNs and engineering novices. The comparison is between ‘crowds' of ANNs and humans. Function structure models of fifteen products are used as input for prediction. Additionally, the type of information provided is varied between topology information and vocabulary information. Prediction accuracy is compared, with the results showing that ANN crowd performs comparably to the novice estimates. However, students are more precise with their predictions. Moreover, student confidence in predictions is analyzed, and results suggest that students have low to moderate confidence in their predictions. Confidence increased with the addition of vocabulary information. Finally, limitations and future work are discussed, with research questions presented for subsequent research. This work motivates future studies on crowds, both human and virtual and the cost-benefits associated with collective intelligence.KEYWORDS: Wisdom of the crowdANN Crowdfunction structuredeep learningmarket value prediction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 https://design.engr.oregonstate.edu/repo.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Engineering Design is a leading international publication that provides an essential forum for dialogue on important issues across all disciplines and aspects of the design of engineered products and systems. The Journal publishes pioneering, contemporary, best industrial practice as well as authoritative research, studies and review papers on the underlying principles of design, its management, practice, techniques and methodologies, rather than specific domain applications.
We welcome papers that examine the following topics:
Engineering design aesthetics, style and form-
Big data analytics in engineering design-
Collaborative design in engineering-
Engineering concept design-
Creativity and innovation in engineering-
Engineering design architectures-
Design costing in engineering
Design education and pedagogy in engineering-
Engineering design for X, e.g. manufacturability, assembly, environment, sustainability-
Engineering design management-
Design risk and uncertainty in engineering-
Engineering design theory and methodology-
Designing product platforms, modularity and reuse in engineering-
Emotive design, e.g. Kansei engineering-
Ergonomics, styling and the design process-
Evolutionary design activity in engineering (product improvement & refinement)-
Global and distributed engineering design-
Inclusive design and assistive engineering technology-
Engineering industrial design and total design-
Integrated engineering design development-
Knowledge and information management in engineering-
Engineering maintainability, sustainability, safety and standards-
Multi, inter and trans disciplinary engineering design-
New engineering product design and development-
Engineering product introduction process[...]