比较使用跟踪集成机器学习的逻辑回归、k近邻、支持向量机和naÏve贝叶斯模型的准确性

IF 0.1 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY JP Journal of Biostatistics Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.17654/0973514324001
Kuntoro Kuntoro
{"title":"比较使用跟踪集成机器学习的逻辑回归、k近邻、支持向量机和naÏve贝叶斯模型的准确性","authors":"Kuntoro Kuntoro","doi":"10.17654/0973514324001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting model for classifying target correctly is important. Logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Support vector machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB) are base models in classifying target. Tracking ensemble is the method for comparing accuracy in machine learning. Datasets are generated by a code of Python as recommended by Brownlee [1]. Five sample sizes of 1,000, 3,000, 5,000, 7,000, and 10,000 are selected. The number of features is 20 having informative and redundant features, respectively, as 15 and 5. The result shows that support vector machine (SVM) has the highest mean of accuracy and the lowest coefficient of variation of accuracy in all sample sizes. Naïve Bayes (NB) has the lowest mean of accuracy and the highest coefficient of variation of accuracy in all sample  sizes. It is recommended to select support vector machine (SVM) for classifying target. Received: August 13, 2023Accepted: October 9, 2023","PeriodicalId":40703,"journal":{"name":"JP Journal of Biostatistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARING ACCURACY OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION, K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR, SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE, AND NAÏVE BAYES MODELS USING TRACKING ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING\",\"authors\":\"Kuntoro Kuntoro\",\"doi\":\"10.17654/0973514324001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Selecting model for classifying target correctly is important. Logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Support vector machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB) are base models in classifying target. Tracking ensemble is the method for comparing accuracy in machine learning. Datasets are generated by a code of Python as recommended by Brownlee [1]. Five sample sizes of 1,000, 3,000, 5,000, 7,000, and 10,000 are selected. The number of features is 20 having informative and redundant features, respectively, as 15 and 5. The result shows that support vector machine (SVM) has the highest mean of accuracy and the lowest coefficient of variation of accuracy in all sample sizes. Naïve Bayes (NB) has the lowest mean of accuracy and the highest coefficient of variation of accuracy in all sample  sizes. It is recommended to select support vector machine (SVM) for classifying target. Received: August 13, 2023Accepted: October 9, 2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":40703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JP Journal of Biostatistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JP Journal of Biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17654/0973514324001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JP Journal of Biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17654/0973514324001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

模型的选择对目标的正确分类至关重要。逻辑回归(LR)、k近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)和Naïve贝叶斯(NB)是分类目标的基本模型。跟踪集成是机器学习中比较精度的一种方法。数据集由Brownlee[1]推荐的Python代码生成。选取1,000、3,000、5,000、7,000和10,000五个样本量。特征的数量为20,信息特征和冗余特征分别为15和5。结果表明,支持向量机在所有样本量下均具有最高的准确率均值和最低的准确率变异系数。Naïve在所有样本大小中,贝叶斯(NB)的准确率均值最低,准确率变异系数最高。建议选择支持向量机(SVM)对目标进行分类。收稿日期:2023年8月13日。收稿日期:2023年10月9日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARING ACCURACY OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION, K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR, SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE, AND NAÏVE BAYES MODELS USING TRACKING ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING
Selecting model for classifying target correctly is important. Logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Support vector machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB) are base models in classifying target. Tracking ensemble is the method for comparing accuracy in machine learning. Datasets are generated by a code of Python as recommended by Brownlee [1]. Five sample sizes of 1,000, 3,000, 5,000, 7,000, and 10,000 are selected. The number of features is 20 having informative and redundant features, respectively, as 15 and 5. The result shows that support vector machine (SVM) has the highest mean of accuracy and the lowest coefficient of variation of accuracy in all sample sizes. Naïve Bayes (NB) has the lowest mean of accuracy and the highest coefficient of variation of accuracy in all sample  sizes. It is recommended to select support vector machine (SVM) for classifying target. Received: August 13, 2023Accepted: October 9, 2023
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JP Journal of Biostatistics
JP Journal of Biostatistics STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
SPATIO-TEMPORAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRESSION OF MENINGITIS EPIDEMICS IN THE THREE CLIMATIC ZONES OF BURKINA FASO DURING 2002 TO 2020 COMBATING DIABETES THROUGH TECHNOLOGY: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSUASIVE INTERVENTIONS FOR DIET AND EXERCISE MANAGEMENT ENHANCING MEDICATION ADHERENCE IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE A PREDICTION MODEL INVESTIGATING VOLUNTARY SHARING OF INFORMATION BY PEOPLE LIVING WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1