多层建筑的性能评估

Taufiq Saidi, Muttaqin Hasan, Imam Muzhaffar, Bambang Setiawan, Juellyan Juellyan
{"title":"多层建筑的性能评估","authors":"Taufiq Saidi, Muttaqin Hasan, Imam Muzhaffar, Bambang Setiawan, Juellyan Juellyan","doi":"10.13170/aijst.12.2.31495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any public infrastructure has a set service life limit. In the Indonesian case, the public building has a 50-year design life. This paper presents a performance assessment of a multiple-story building in Aceh-Indonesia. A multi-story Faculty of Engineering Universitas Syiah Kuala building was used in this study. This multi-story building structure has been used for more than 24 years since it was built in 1998. This structure is 29.4 m long, 13 m wide, and 14.4 m tall in geometric terms. This study reveals how this three-story building behaves, including displacement, base shear, and structure performance level per ASCE 41-17 criteria. The processes in this study are broken down into various stages, including pushover analysis and comparing the building's current natural frequency. ETABS software was used to model building structures. According to the study, the building's performance is still more or less similar to the initial plan. Pushover in the X-direction (Push X) is believed to be immediate occupancy (IO), and pushover in the Y-direction (Push Y) is believed to be life safety (LS). The pushover analysis results for Push X suggested that the structure is safe and retains rigidity. Push Y indicated minor damage within the life safety category after a service life of 24 years. This pushover analysis indicated that the structure has reduced its rigidity, making it less able to resist further displacement. Based on the base shear, which experiences a displacement that is significantly greater than the estimate at the original planning stage, it is known that stiffness decreases.","PeriodicalId":7128,"journal":{"name":"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Assessment of Multi-story Building\",\"authors\":\"Taufiq Saidi, Muttaqin Hasan, Imam Muzhaffar, Bambang Setiawan, Juellyan Juellyan\",\"doi\":\"10.13170/aijst.12.2.31495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Any public infrastructure has a set service life limit. In the Indonesian case, the public building has a 50-year design life. This paper presents a performance assessment of a multiple-story building in Aceh-Indonesia. A multi-story Faculty of Engineering Universitas Syiah Kuala building was used in this study. This multi-story building structure has been used for more than 24 years since it was built in 1998. This structure is 29.4 m long, 13 m wide, and 14.4 m tall in geometric terms. This study reveals how this three-story building behaves, including displacement, base shear, and structure performance level per ASCE 41-17 criteria. The processes in this study are broken down into various stages, including pushover analysis and comparing the building's current natural frequency. ETABS software was used to model building structures. According to the study, the building's performance is still more or less similar to the initial plan. Pushover in the X-direction (Push X) is believed to be immediate occupancy (IO), and pushover in the Y-direction (Push Y) is believed to be life safety (LS). The pushover analysis results for Push X suggested that the structure is safe and retains rigidity. Push Y indicated minor damage within the life safety category after a service life of 24 years. This pushover analysis indicated that the structure has reduced its rigidity, making it less able to resist further displacement. Based on the base shear, which experiences a displacement that is significantly greater than the estimate at the original planning stage, it is known that stiffness decreases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13170/aijst.12.2.31495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aceh International Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13170/aijst.12.2.31495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

任何公共基础设施都有一定的使用寿命限制。在印尼的案例中,公共建筑的设计寿命为50年。本文介绍了印度尼西亚亚齐省一座多层建筑的性能评估。本研究使用的是马来西亚工程大学的一幢多层建筑。这座多层建筑结构自1998年建成以来,已经使用了24年以上。该结构长29.4米,宽13米,高14.4米。本研究揭示了这座三层建筑的性能,包括位移、基底剪切和按ASCE 41-17标准的结构性能水平。这项研究的过程分为不同的阶段,包括推覆分析和比较建筑当前的固有频率。采用ETABS软件对建筑结构进行建模。根据研究,该建筑的性能仍然或多或少与最初的计划相似。X方向的推入(Push X)认为是立即占用(IO), Y方向的推入(Push Y)认为是生命安全(LS)。Push X的推覆分析结果表明,该结构是安全的,并保持了刚度。按Y表示在24年的使用寿命后轻微损坏,属于生命安全范畴。这种推覆分析表明,结构已经降低了其刚度,使其无法抵抗进一步的位移。根据基础剪力,其经历的位移明显大于原始规划阶段的估计,已知刚度减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Assessment of Multi-story Building
Any public infrastructure has a set service life limit. In the Indonesian case, the public building has a 50-year design life. This paper presents a performance assessment of a multiple-story building in Aceh-Indonesia. A multi-story Faculty of Engineering Universitas Syiah Kuala building was used in this study. This multi-story building structure has been used for more than 24 years since it was built in 1998. This structure is 29.4 m long, 13 m wide, and 14.4 m tall in geometric terms. This study reveals how this three-story building behaves, including displacement, base shear, and structure performance level per ASCE 41-17 criteria. The processes in this study are broken down into various stages, including pushover analysis and comparing the building's current natural frequency. ETABS software was used to model building structures. According to the study, the building's performance is still more or less similar to the initial plan. Pushover in the X-direction (Push X) is believed to be immediate occupancy (IO), and pushover in the Y-direction (Push Y) is believed to be life safety (LS). The pushover analysis results for Push X suggested that the structure is safe and retains rigidity. Push Y indicated minor damage within the life safety category after a service life of 24 years. This pushover analysis indicated that the structure has reduced its rigidity, making it less able to resist further displacement. Based on the base shear, which experiences a displacement that is significantly greater than the estimate at the original planning stage, it is known that stiffness decreases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structural Health Monitoring by Identification Dynamic Properties and Load Rating Factor at Multi-span Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridge Isotherm and Kinetic Adsorption of Cadmium (Cd) onto Biosorbent Made from Kepok Banana Peel (Musa Acuminata balbisian): the Effect of Activator Type and Biosorbent Dosage Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Payback Period of 12-kW Wind Turbine for a Remote Telecommunications Base Station Simulation of Multi Reservoir Operation Rules with Interconnected Tunnel and Water Transfer Simple Technology of Material Physics of Groundwater Conservation in Dealing with Climate Change in Disaster Areas of North Sumatra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1