肱骨近端骨折全肩关节置换术或反向肩关节置换术患者术后阿片类药物依赖的研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Surgical technology international Pub Date : 2023-12-15 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI:10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1729
Nayeem Baksh, Jeremy Dubin, Scott Douglas, Sandeep S Bains, Daniel Hameed, Mallory C Moore, Qais Naziri, Michael A Mont, John V Ingari
{"title":"肱骨近端骨折全肩关节置换术或反向肩关节置换术患者术后阿片类药物依赖的研究。","authors":"Nayeem Baksh, Jeremy Dubin, Scott Douglas, Sandeep S Bains, Daniel Hameed, Mallory C Moore, Qais Naziri, Michael A Mont, John V Ingari","doi":"10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In elderly patients who have proximal humerus fractures, treatment commonly involves total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Following these procedures, patients often require opioids for postoperative analgesia. This common scenario is of clinical and societal importance, as increased postoperative opioid usage has been shown to worsen outcomes and increase the likelihood for dependence. We aimed to compare postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing either TSA or RSA for fixation of their proximal humerus fracture. Specifically, we assessed: (1) postoperative opioid use at two, four, six, eight, and greater than eight weeks postoperatively; (2) aseptic revision rates at 90-days, one year, and two years postoperatively; and (3) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates at 90-days, one year, and two years postoperatively between patients undergoing TSA or RSA for the surgical management of their proximal humerus fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For this review, we queried a national all-payer database from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020 (n=1.5 million) for all patients who had a \"proximal humerus fracture\" diagnosis who underwent either TSA or RSA. There were two cohorts: patients undergoing TSA (n=731) and patients undergoing RSA (n=731). Bivariate Chi-square analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no differences (p>0.05) in opioid use postoperatively in patients undergoing RSA for proximal humerus management compared to patients undergoing TSA after two weeks. There was not a significant difference in aseptic revision or PJI rates between the two cohorts (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence comparing opioid use in patients undergoing either TSA or RSA for proximal humerus fracture fixation is lacking. Our study specifically showed no differences in opioid use postoperatively in patients undergoing RSA for proximal humerus management compared to patients undergoing TSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Opioid Dependence in Patients Undergoing Either Total or Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Nayeem Baksh, Jeremy Dubin, Scott Douglas, Sandeep S Bains, Daniel Hameed, Mallory C Moore, Qais Naziri, Michael A Mont, John V Ingari\",\"doi\":\"10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In elderly patients who have proximal humerus fractures, treatment commonly involves total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Following these procedures, patients often require opioids for postoperative analgesia. This common scenario is of clinical and societal importance, as increased postoperative opioid usage has been shown to worsen outcomes and increase the likelihood for dependence. We aimed to compare postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing either TSA or RSA for fixation of their proximal humerus fracture. Specifically, we assessed: (1) postoperative opioid use at two, four, six, eight, and greater than eight weeks postoperatively; (2) aseptic revision rates at 90-days, one year, and two years postoperatively; and (3) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates at 90-days, one year, and two years postoperatively between patients undergoing TSA or RSA for the surgical management of their proximal humerus fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For this review, we queried a national all-payer database from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020 (n=1.5 million) for all patients who had a \\\"proximal humerus fracture\\\" diagnosis who underwent either TSA or RSA. There were two cohorts: patients undergoing TSA (n=731) and patients undergoing RSA (n=731). Bivariate Chi-square analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no differences (p>0.05) in opioid use postoperatively in patients undergoing RSA for proximal humerus management compared to patients undergoing TSA after two weeks. There was not a significant difference in aseptic revision or PJI rates between the two cohorts (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence comparing opioid use in patients undergoing either TSA or RSA for proximal humerus fracture fixation is lacking. Our study specifically showed no differences in opioid use postoperatively in patients undergoing RSA for proximal humerus management compared to patients undergoing TSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在肱骨近端骨折的老年患者中,治疗通常包括全肩关节置换术(TSA)或反向肩关节置换术(RSA)。遵循这些程序,患者通常需要阿片类药物用于术后镇痛。这种常见的情况具有临床和社会重要性,因为术后阿片类药物的使用增加已被证明会使结果恶化并增加依赖的可能性。我们的目的是比较接受TSA或RSA固定肱骨近端骨折的患者术后阿片类药物的使用。具体来说,我们评估了:(1)术后2周、4周、6周、8周和8周以上的阿片类药物使用情况;(2)术后90天、1年、2年无菌改良率;(3)接受TSA或RSA手术治疗肱骨近端骨折的患者在术后90天、1年和2年的假体周围关节感染(PJI)率。材料和方法:在本综述中,我们查询了2015年10月1日至2020年10月31日的全国全付款人数据库(n= 150万),查询了所有接受TSA或RSA诊断为“肱骨近端骨折”的患者。有两个队列:接受TSA的患者(n=731)和接受RSA的患者(n=731)。双变量卡方分析。结果:我们发现肱骨近端RSA患者术后阿片类药物使用与两周后TSA患者相比无差异(p>0.05)。两组间无菌改良或PJI发生率无显著差异(均p < 0.05)。结论:在肱骨近端骨折行TSA或RSA固定的患者中比较阿片类药物使用的证据不足。我们的研究特别表明,与接受TSA治疗的患者相比,接受肱骨近端RSA治疗的患者术后使用阿片类药物没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Opioid Dependence in Patients Undergoing Either Total or Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation.

Introduction: In elderly patients who have proximal humerus fractures, treatment commonly involves total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Following these procedures, patients often require opioids for postoperative analgesia. This common scenario is of clinical and societal importance, as increased postoperative opioid usage has been shown to worsen outcomes and increase the likelihood for dependence. We aimed to compare postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing either TSA or RSA for fixation of their proximal humerus fracture. Specifically, we assessed: (1) postoperative opioid use at two, four, six, eight, and greater than eight weeks postoperatively; (2) aseptic revision rates at 90-days, one year, and two years postoperatively; and (3) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates at 90-days, one year, and two years postoperatively between patients undergoing TSA or RSA for the surgical management of their proximal humerus fractures.

Materials and methods: For this review, we queried a national all-payer database from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020 (n=1.5 million) for all patients who had a "proximal humerus fracture" diagnosis who underwent either TSA or RSA. There were two cohorts: patients undergoing TSA (n=731) and patients undergoing RSA (n=731). Bivariate Chi-square analyses.

Results: We found no differences (p>0.05) in opioid use postoperatively in patients undergoing RSA for proximal humerus management compared to patients undergoing TSA after two weeks. There was not a significant difference in aseptic revision or PJI rates between the two cohorts (all p>0.05).

Conclusion: The evidence comparing opioid use in patients undergoing either TSA or RSA for proximal humerus fracture fixation is lacking. Our study specifically showed no differences in opioid use postoperatively in patients undergoing RSA for proximal humerus management compared to patients undergoing TSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
期刊最新文献
Robotic Assisted Lapendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ileal Deep Endometriosis. A Case Report and Review of Literature. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials. Cardiophrenic Lymph Node Resection Through Abdominal Subxiphoid Approach: Surgical Technique. What Happens to Endometriosis During the Menstrual Cycle? Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with Thinner and Less Constrained Polyethylene Inserts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1