Maria P. Velez, Deshayne B. Fell, Jonas P. Shellenberger, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Joel G. Ray
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种后流产:一项基于人群的队列研究","authors":"Maria P. Velez, Deshayne B. Fell, Jonas P. Shellenberger, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Joel G. Ray","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the risk of miscarriage following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Population-based cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Ontario, Canada.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Women aged 15–50 years with a confirmed pregnancy at ≤19 completed weeks’ gestation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Exposure to first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, handled in a time-varying manner, was defined as (i) unvaccinated, (ii) remotely vaccinated >28 days before the estimated conception date or (iii) recently vaccinated ≤28 days before conception and up to 120 days after conception.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>The outcome was miscarriage, occurring between the estimated date of conception and up to 19 completed weeks of pregnancy. Fine-Grey hazard models, accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion, generated hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted for socio-demographic factors, comorbidities, and biweekly periods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Included were 246 259 pregnant women, of whom 34% received a first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Miscarriage occurred at a rate of 3.6 per 10 000 person-days among remotely vaccinated women and 3.2 per 10 000 person-days among those recently vaccinated, in contrast to a rate of 1.9 per 10 000 person-days among unvaccinated women, with corresponding aHR of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.07) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.93–1.08).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with miscarriage while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion. This study reiterates the importance of including pregnant women in new vaccine clinical trials and registries, and the rapid dissemination of vaccine safety data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"131 4","pages":"415-422"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17721","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Miscarriage after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A population-based cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Maria P. Velez, Deshayne B. Fell, Jonas P. Shellenberger, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Joel G. Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the risk of miscarriage following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Population-based cohort study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ontario, Canada.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Women aged 15–50 years with a confirmed pregnancy at ≤19 completed weeks’ gestation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Exposure to first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, handled in a time-varying manner, was defined as (i) unvaccinated, (ii) remotely vaccinated >28 days before the estimated conception date or (iii) recently vaccinated ≤28 days before conception and up to 120 days after conception.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>The outcome was miscarriage, occurring between the estimated date of conception and up to 19 completed weeks of pregnancy. Fine-Grey hazard models, accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion, generated hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted for socio-demographic factors, comorbidities, and biweekly periods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Included were 246 259 pregnant women, of whom 34% received a first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Miscarriage occurred at a rate of 3.6 per 10 000 person-days among remotely vaccinated women and 3.2 per 10 000 person-days among those recently vaccinated, in contrast to a rate of 1.9 per 10 000 person-days among unvaccinated women, with corresponding aHR of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.07) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.93–1.08).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with miscarriage while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion. This study reiterates the importance of including pregnant women in new vaccine clinical trials and registries, and the rapid dissemination of vaccine safety data.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"131 4\",\"pages\":\"415-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17721\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后的流产风险,同时考虑人工流产的竞争风险。设计:基于人群的队列研究。环境:加拿大安大略省。参与者:年龄在15-50岁,确认妊娠≤19周的女性。方法:首次接触SARS-CoV-2疫苗,以时变方式处理,定义为(i)未接种疫苗,(ii)在估计受孕日期前28天远程接种疫苗,或(iii)在受孕前≤28天至受孕后120天内最近接种疫苗。主要结局指标:结果为流产,发生在估计受孕日期至怀孕19周之间。细灰色风险模型,考虑人工流产的竞争风险,产生风险比(aHR),调整社会人口因素、合并症和双周周期。结果:纳入246259名孕妇,其中34%首次接种了SARS-CoV-2疫苗。在远程接种疫苗的妇女中,流产率为每1万人日3.6例,在最近接种疫苗的妇女中为每1万人日3.2例,而未接种疫苗的妇女中,流产率为每1万人日1.9例,相应的aHR为0.98(95%可信区间[CI] 0.91-1.07)和1.00 (95% CI 0.93-1.08)。结论:SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种与流产无关,但考虑了人工流产的竞争风险。这项研究重申了将孕妇纳入新疫苗临床试验和登记以及迅速传播疫苗安全性数据的重要性。
Miscarriage after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A population-based cohort study
Objective
To evaluate the risk of miscarriage following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion.
Design
Population-based cohort study.
Setting
Ontario, Canada.
Participants
Women aged 15–50 years with a confirmed pregnancy at ≤19 completed weeks’ gestation.
Methods
Exposure to first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, handled in a time-varying manner, was defined as (i) unvaccinated, (ii) remotely vaccinated >28 days before the estimated conception date or (iii) recently vaccinated ≤28 days before conception and up to 120 days after conception.
Main outcome measures
The outcome was miscarriage, occurring between the estimated date of conception and up to 19 completed weeks of pregnancy. Fine-Grey hazard models, accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion, generated hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted for socio-demographic factors, comorbidities, and biweekly periods.
Results
Included were 246 259 pregnant women, of whom 34% received a first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Miscarriage occurred at a rate of 3.6 per 10 000 person-days among remotely vaccinated women and 3.2 per 10 000 person-days among those recently vaccinated, in contrast to a rate of 1.9 per 10 000 person-days among unvaccinated women, with corresponding aHR of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.07) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.93–1.08).
Conclusions
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with miscarriage while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion. This study reiterates the importance of including pregnant women in new vaccine clinical trials and registries, and the rapid dissemination of vaccine safety data.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.