SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种后流产:一项基于人群的队列研究

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17721
Maria P. Velez, Deshayne B. Fell, Jonas P. Shellenberger, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Joel G. Ray
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种后流产:一项基于人群的队列研究","authors":"Maria P. Velez,&nbsp;Deshayne B. Fell,&nbsp;Jonas P. Shellenberger,&nbsp;Jeffrey C. Kwong,&nbsp;Joel G. Ray","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the risk of miscarriage following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Population-based cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Ontario, Canada.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Women aged 15–50 years with a confirmed pregnancy at ≤19 completed weeks’ gestation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Exposure to first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, handled in a time-varying manner, was defined as (i) unvaccinated, (ii) remotely vaccinated &gt;28 days before the estimated conception date or (iii) recently vaccinated ≤28 days before conception and up to 120 days after conception.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>The outcome was miscarriage, occurring between the estimated date of conception and up to 19 completed weeks of pregnancy. Fine-Grey hazard models, accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion, generated hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted for socio-demographic factors, comorbidities, and biweekly periods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Included were 246 259 pregnant women, of whom 34% received a first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Miscarriage occurred at a rate of 3.6 per 10 000 person-days among remotely vaccinated women and 3.2 per 10 000 person-days among those recently vaccinated, in contrast to a rate of 1.9 per 10 000 person-days among unvaccinated women, with corresponding aHR of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.07) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.93–1.08).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with miscarriage while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion. This study reiterates the importance of including pregnant women in new vaccine clinical trials and registries, and the rapid dissemination of vaccine safety data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"131 4","pages":"415-422"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17721","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Miscarriage after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A population-based cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Maria P. Velez,&nbsp;Deshayne B. Fell,&nbsp;Jonas P. Shellenberger,&nbsp;Jeffrey C. Kwong,&nbsp;Joel G. Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the risk of miscarriage following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Population-based cohort study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ontario, Canada.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Women aged 15–50 years with a confirmed pregnancy at ≤19 completed weeks’ gestation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Exposure to first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, handled in a time-varying manner, was defined as (i) unvaccinated, (ii) remotely vaccinated &gt;28 days before the estimated conception date or (iii) recently vaccinated ≤28 days before conception and up to 120 days after conception.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>The outcome was miscarriage, occurring between the estimated date of conception and up to 19 completed weeks of pregnancy. Fine-Grey hazard models, accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion, generated hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted for socio-demographic factors, comorbidities, and biweekly periods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Included were 246 259 pregnant women, of whom 34% received a first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Miscarriage occurred at a rate of 3.6 per 10 000 person-days among remotely vaccinated women and 3.2 per 10 000 person-days among those recently vaccinated, in contrast to a rate of 1.9 per 10 000 person-days among unvaccinated women, with corresponding aHR of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.07) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.93–1.08).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with miscarriage while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion. This study reiterates the importance of including pregnant women in new vaccine clinical trials and registries, and the rapid dissemination of vaccine safety data.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"131 4\",\"pages\":\"415-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17721\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后的流产风险,同时考虑人工流产的竞争风险。设计:基于人群的队列研究。环境:加拿大安大略省。参与者:年龄在15-50岁,确认妊娠≤19周的女性。方法:首次接触SARS-CoV-2疫苗,以时变方式处理,定义为(i)未接种疫苗,(ii)在估计受孕日期前28天远程接种疫苗,或(iii)在受孕前≤28天至受孕后120天内最近接种疫苗。主要结局指标:结果为流产,发生在估计受孕日期至怀孕19周之间。细灰色风险模型,考虑人工流产的竞争风险,产生风险比(aHR),调整社会人口因素、合并症和双周周期。结果:纳入246259名孕妇,其中34%首次接种了SARS-CoV-2疫苗。在远程接种疫苗的妇女中,流产率为每1万人日3.6例,在最近接种疫苗的妇女中为每1万人日3.2例,而未接种疫苗的妇女中,流产率为每1万人日1.9例,相应的aHR为0.98(95%可信区间[CI] 0.91-1.07)和1.00 (95% CI 0.93-1.08)。结论:SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种与流产无关,但考虑了人工流产的竞争风险。这项研究重申了将孕妇纳入新疫苗临床试验和登记以及迅速传播疫苗安全性数据的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Miscarriage after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A population-based cohort study

Objective

To evaluate the risk of miscarriage following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion.

Design

Population-based cohort study.

Setting

Ontario, Canada.

Participants

Women aged 15–50 years with a confirmed pregnancy at ≤19 completed weeks’ gestation.

Methods

Exposure to first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, handled in a time-varying manner, was defined as (i) unvaccinated, (ii) remotely vaccinated >28 days before the estimated conception date or (iii) recently vaccinated ≤28 days before conception and up to 120 days after conception.

Main outcome measures

The outcome was miscarriage, occurring between the estimated date of conception and up to 19 completed weeks of pregnancy. Fine-Grey hazard models, accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion, generated hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted for socio-demographic factors, comorbidities, and biweekly periods.

Results

Included were 246 259 pregnant women, of whom 34% received a first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Miscarriage occurred at a rate of 3.6 per 10 000 person-days among remotely vaccinated women and 3.2 per 10 000 person-days among those recently vaccinated, in contrast to a rate of 1.9 per 10 000 person-days among unvaccinated women, with corresponding aHR of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.07) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.93–1.08).

Conclusions

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with miscarriage while accounting for the competing risk of induced abortion. This study reiterates the importance of including pregnant women in new vaccine clinical trials and registries, and the rapid dissemination of vaccine safety data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Improving trustworthiness in research on women's health: Some suggestions from a reviewer's viewpoint. Maternal suicide up to 1 year postpartum: Evidence or emotion-based medicine? ChatGPT, Google and healthcare institution sources of postoperative patient instructions. Improving trustworthiness in research in women's health is a joint effort. Author Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1