《2014年医学终止妊娠(修正)法案》:一项积极的说明

K.K. Sunitha
{"title":"《2014年医学终止妊娠(修正)法案》:一项积极的说明","authors":"K.K. Sunitha","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is an attempt to analyze the proposed amendment to The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 in the current scenario of reproductive rights and abortion law in India. This is a comparative analysis of abortion laws in India with that of United States, United Kingdom, and South Africa. The paper finds the proposed amendments as radical and gender-sensitive in comparison with its legislative counter parts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.12.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill, 2014: A positive note\",\"authors\":\"K.K. Sunitha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper is an attempt to analyze the proposed amendment to The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 in the current scenario of reproductive rights and abortion law in India. This is a comparative analysis of abortion laws in India with that of United States, United Kingdom, and South Africa. The paper finds the proposed amendments as radical and gender-sensitive in comparison with its legislative counter parts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2015.12.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reproductive health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X15000480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X15000480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文试图在印度生殖权利和堕胎法的当前情况下,分析1971年《医疗终止妊娠法》的拟议修正案。这是印度与美国、英国和南非堕胎法的比较分析。本文件认为,拟议的修正案与相应的立法部分相比是激进和对性别问题敏感的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill, 2014: A positive note

This paper is an attempt to analyze the proposed amendment to The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 in the current scenario of reproductive rights and abortion law in India. This is a comparative analysis of abortion laws in India with that of United States, United Kingdom, and South Africa. The paper finds the proposed amendments as radical and gender-sensitive in comparison with its legislative counter parts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fate of the germ cells in mammalian ovary: A review Endocrine disruption and female reproductive health: Implications on cross-talk between endocrine and autocrine/paracrine axes in the ovary Cyclic nucleotides regulate oocyte meiotic maturation and quality in mammals Gene profiling the window of implantation: Microarray analyses from human and rodent models Does elevated serum progesterone on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration decrease live birth rates?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1