非选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术是真正的日间手术还是23小时住院?

Q4 Nursing Ambulatory Surgery Pub Date : 2006-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.11.001
H.M. Paterson , R. McMillan , S.J. Nixon
{"title":"非选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术是真正的日间手术还是23小时住院?","authors":"H.M. Paterson ,&nbsp;R. McMillan ,&nbsp;S.J. Nixon","doi":"10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK is reported in selected patient groups but its role in managing the majority of patients with symptomatic </span>gallstones is unclear. We examined use of the </span>ambulatory surgery unit (ASU) for unselected elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Data were collected for 1 year. High-risk patients with known bile duct calculi, BMI</span> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->40 and/or previous upper abdominal open surgery were excluded from ASU laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Standard surgical or anaesthetic protocols were used and standard criteria for discharge were employed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 1 year, 258 of 275 patients (94%) admitted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the ASU were discharged within 23<!--> <span><span>h of admission including 62 patients (23%) discharged on the day of surgery. There were 16 (5%) </span>conversions to open surgery and 10 (4%) unplanned readmissions to inpatient beds. Forty ‘high-risk’ patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from inpatient beds of which 29 (73%) were discharged within 23</span> <!-->h.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ASU is the optimal location for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to maximize day case throughput and minimize impact on inpatient bed occupancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38794,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Surgery","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 177-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.11.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"True day surgery or 23-hour admission for unselected elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy?\",\"authors\":\"H.M. Paterson ,&nbsp;R. McMillan ,&nbsp;S.J. Nixon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK is reported in selected patient groups but its role in managing the majority of patients with symptomatic </span>gallstones is unclear. We examined use of the </span>ambulatory surgery unit (ASU) for unselected elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Data were collected for 1 year. High-risk patients with known bile duct calculi, BMI</span> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->40 and/or previous upper abdominal open surgery were excluded from ASU laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Standard surgical or anaesthetic protocols were used and standard criteria for discharge were employed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 1 year, 258 of 275 patients (94%) admitted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the ASU were discharged within 23<!--> <span><span>h of admission including 62 patients (23%) discharged on the day of surgery. There were 16 (5%) </span>conversions to open surgery and 10 (4%) unplanned readmissions to inpatient beds. Forty ‘high-risk’ patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from inpatient beds of which 29 (73%) were discharged within 23</span> <!-->h.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ASU is the optimal location for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to maximize day case throughput and minimize impact on inpatient bed occupancy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambulatory Surgery\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 177-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.11.001\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambulatory Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966653205000739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966653205000739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在英国,腹腔镜胆囊切除术在一些特定的患者群体中有报道,但其在大多数有症状的胆结石患者中的作用尚不清楚。我们研究了门诊手术单元(ASU)在非选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用。方法收集资料1年。已知胆管结石高危患者,BMI >40和/或既往上腹部开放手术被排除在ASU腹腔镜胆囊切除术中。采用标准的手术或麻醉方案,并采用标准的出院标准。结果1年内经ASU行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的275例患者中有258例(94%)在入院后23小时内出院,其中62例(23%)在手术当日出院。有16例(5%)转为开放手术,10例(4%)意外再次住院。40例“高危”患者在住院床位行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,其中29例(73%)在23 h内出院。结论ASU是择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳地点,可最大限度地提高日病例吞吐量,最大限度地减少对住院床位占用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
True day surgery or 23-hour admission for unselected elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Background

Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK is reported in selected patient groups but its role in managing the majority of patients with symptomatic gallstones is unclear. We examined use of the ambulatory surgery unit (ASU) for unselected elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

Data were collected for 1 year. High-risk patients with known bile duct calculi, BMI > 40 and/or previous upper abdominal open surgery were excluded from ASU laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Standard surgical or anaesthetic protocols were used and standard criteria for discharge were employed.

Results

In 1 year, 258 of 275 patients (94%) admitted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the ASU were discharged within 23 h of admission including 62 patients (23%) discharged on the day of surgery. There were 16 (5%) conversions to open surgery and 10 (4%) unplanned readmissions to inpatient beds. Forty ‘high-risk’ patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from inpatient beds of which 29 (73%) were discharged within 23 h.

Conclusion

The ASU is the optimal location for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to maximize day case throughput and minimize impact on inpatient bed occupancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ambulatory Surgery
Ambulatory Surgery Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bacterial gene expression analysis using microarrays. Author index Subject Index Editorial Board Ambulatory Surgery Calender
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1