关于实时操作系统:如何比较性能?

M Maechtel, H Rzehak
{"title":"关于实时操作系统:如何比较性能?","authors":"M Maechtel,&nbsp;H Rzehak","doi":"10.1016/0066-4138(94)90024-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To compare realtime operating systems one must often rely on specifications given by the manufacturers. These published data are often measured by so-called benchmarks. But with the help of benchmarks it is not possible to collect sufficient information to determine the system behaviour for worst cases. Therefore it must be clarified which latency times exist and how they arise. Of great significance is the additional latency time of the operating system, which is compulsory for the design of the application. In this paper it is investigated whether and how long a given task, activated by an external interrupt, is delayed until task completion. For that all latency times which can occur are discussed, specifically the worst cases. We are taking a closer look at realtime operating systems which encourage so-called kernel-level threads. The advantage of these kernel-level threads systems in contrast to traditional systems are discussed referring to performance. At the moment we are testing two systems, LynxOS and HP-RT. We want to measure the worst-case latency times and therefore illustrate how this is done.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100097,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review in Automatic Programming","volume":"18 ","pages":"Pages 139-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0066-4138(94)90024-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On realtime operating systems: How to compare performance ?\",\"authors\":\"M Maechtel,&nbsp;H Rzehak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0066-4138(94)90024-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To compare realtime operating systems one must often rely on specifications given by the manufacturers. These published data are often measured by so-called benchmarks. But with the help of benchmarks it is not possible to collect sufficient information to determine the system behaviour for worst cases. Therefore it must be clarified which latency times exist and how they arise. Of great significance is the additional latency time of the operating system, which is compulsory for the design of the application. In this paper it is investigated whether and how long a given task, activated by an external interrupt, is delayed until task completion. For that all latency times which can occur are discussed, specifically the worst cases. We are taking a closer look at realtime operating systems which encourage so-called kernel-level threads. The advantage of these kernel-level threads systems in contrast to traditional systems are discussed referring to performance. At the moment we are testing two systems, LynxOS and HP-RT. We want to measure the worst-case latency times and therefore illustrate how this is done.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review in Automatic Programming\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 139-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0066-4138(94)90024-8\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review in Automatic Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0066413894900248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review in Automatic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0066413894900248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了比较实时操作系统,通常必须依赖于制造商给出的规格。这些公布的数据通常用所谓的基准来衡量。但是,在基准测试的帮助下,不可能收集到足够的信息来确定最坏情况下的系统行为。因此,必须澄清存在哪些延迟时间以及它们是如何产生的。非常重要的是操作系统的额外延迟时间,这对于应用程序的设计是必需的。本文研究了由外部中断激活的给定任务在任务完成之前是否延迟以及延迟多长时间。为此,讨论了所有可能发生的延迟时间,特别是最坏的情况。我们正在仔细研究实时操作系统,它鼓励所谓的内核级线程。从性能方面讨论了这些内核级线程系统与传统系统相比的优势。目前我们正在测试两种系统,LynxOS和HP-RT。我们想要测量最坏情况下的延迟时间,从而说明这是如何完成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On realtime operating systems: How to compare performance ?

To compare realtime operating systems one must often rely on specifications given by the manufacturers. These published data are often measured by so-called benchmarks. But with the help of benchmarks it is not possible to collect sufficient information to determine the system behaviour for worst cases. Therefore it must be clarified which latency times exist and how they arise. Of great significance is the additional latency time of the operating system, which is compulsory for the design of the application. In this paper it is investigated whether and how long a given task, activated by an external interrupt, is delayed until task completion. For that all latency times which can occur are discussed, specifically the worst cases. We are taking a closer look at realtime operating systems which encourage so-called kernel-level threads. The advantage of these kernel-level threads systems in contrast to traditional systems are discussed referring to performance. At the moment we are testing two systems, LynxOS and HP-RT. We want to measure the worst-case latency times and therefore illustrate how this is done.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author index Foreword Keyword index Author index Preface
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1