清洁、绿色和无形:CompeSA框架|评估碳中和政策路径中相互竞争的可持续性议程

Q1 Social Sciences Global Transitions Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.glt.2022.10.004
Katherine Mahoney , João Pedro Gouveia , Rita Lopes , Siddharth Sareen
{"title":"清洁、绿色和无形:CompeSA框架|评估碳中和政策路径中相互竞争的可持续性议程","authors":"Katherine Mahoney ,&nbsp;João Pedro Gouveia ,&nbsp;Rita Lopes ,&nbsp;Siddharth Sareen","doi":"10.1016/j.glt.2022.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Competing agendas are common within the sustainability field, given its complex and diverse social, economic, and environmental priorities. They can cause less effective policy results, where multiple goals can result in trade-offs and policy compromises. This paper proposes a conceptual framework: CompeSA – Assessing Competing Sustainability Agendas in Carbon Neutrality Policy Pathways. This framework enables the exploration of competing sustainability agendas arising from the simultaneous implementation of climate change, energy transitions, and energy poverty agendas. CompeSA is built on three key steps, 1) The WHAT, aiming to define the scope, 2) The WHERE, to understand the scales at which corresponding policy impacts apply; and 3) the WHO, for deep characterization and analysis of the key stakeholder groups.</p><p>We base the development and application of the framework in Portugal, a test case strongly engaged with the carbon neutrality agenda, to illustrate important dilemmas over policy mixes and unpack emerging synergies and barriers. Identified synergies include the linked concepts of economic recovery and employment opportunities, mainly through renewable energy expansion, enhanced economic competitiveness, and skilled job creation. Improvements in air quality and the built environment contribute to health benefits. The most significant barriers are inequitable benefit allocation and power imbalances between the energy-poor and agenda-setting actors. Our demonstration shows CompeSA to be a helpful support tool for structured analysis of competing sustainability agendas and pinpoints key critical points that determine the effectiveness of sustainability policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33615,"journal":{"name":"Global Transitions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791822000135/pdfft?md5=d65ceaf86b44fd1be1e27991ffbc0b6b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589791822000135-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clean, green and the unseen: The CompeSA framework | Assessing Competing Sustainability Agendas in Carbon Neutrality Policy Pathways\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Mahoney ,&nbsp;João Pedro Gouveia ,&nbsp;Rita Lopes ,&nbsp;Siddharth Sareen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.glt.2022.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Competing agendas are common within the sustainability field, given its complex and diverse social, economic, and environmental priorities. They can cause less effective policy results, where multiple goals can result in trade-offs and policy compromises. This paper proposes a conceptual framework: CompeSA – Assessing Competing Sustainability Agendas in Carbon Neutrality Policy Pathways. This framework enables the exploration of competing sustainability agendas arising from the simultaneous implementation of climate change, energy transitions, and energy poverty agendas. CompeSA is built on three key steps, 1) The WHAT, aiming to define the scope, 2) The WHERE, to understand the scales at which corresponding policy impacts apply; and 3) the WHO, for deep characterization and analysis of the key stakeholder groups.</p><p>We base the development and application of the framework in Portugal, a test case strongly engaged with the carbon neutrality agenda, to illustrate important dilemmas over policy mixes and unpack emerging synergies and barriers. Identified synergies include the linked concepts of economic recovery and employment opportunities, mainly through renewable energy expansion, enhanced economic competitiveness, and skilled job creation. Improvements in air quality and the built environment contribute to health benefits. The most significant barriers are inequitable benefit allocation and power imbalances between the energy-poor and agenda-setting actors. Our demonstration shows CompeSA to be a helpful support tool for structured analysis of competing sustainability agendas and pinpoints key critical points that determine the effectiveness of sustainability policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Transitions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791822000135/pdfft?md5=d65ceaf86b44fd1be1e27991ffbc0b6b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589791822000135-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791822000135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791822000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到可持续发展领域复杂多样的社会、经济和环境优先事项,相互竞争的议程在该领域很常见。它们可能导致效率较低的政策结果,其中多个目标可能导致权衡和政策妥协。本文提出了一个概念框架:CompeSA -评估碳中和政策路径中相互竞争的可持续性议程。这一框架使我们能够探索同时实施气候变化、能源转型和能源贫困议程所产生的相互竞争的可持续性议程。CompeSA建立在三个关键步骤上:1)“什么”,旨在定义范围;2)“在哪里”,了解相应政策影响的适用范围;3)世卫组织,对主要利益攸关方群体进行深入描述和分析。我们将该框架的开发和应用建立在葡萄牙的基础上,这是一个与碳中和议程密切相关的测试案例,以说明政策混合的重要困境,并揭示新出现的协同效应和障碍。已确定的协同效应包括经济复苏和就业机会的相关概念,主要是通过扩大可再生能源、增强经济竞争力和创造熟练就业机会。空气质量和建筑环境的改善有利于健康。最重要的障碍是不公平的利益分配和能源贫乏者与议程设定者之间的权力不平衡。我们的演示表明,CompeSA是一个有用的支持工具,可以对相互竞争的可持续发展议程进行结构化分析,并确定决定可持续发展政策有效性的关键点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clean, green and the unseen: The CompeSA framework | Assessing Competing Sustainability Agendas in Carbon Neutrality Policy Pathways

Competing agendas are common within the sustainability field, given its complex and diverse social, economic, and environmental priorities. They can cause less effective policy results, where multiple goals can result in trade-offs and policy compromises. This paper proposes a conceptual framework: CompeSA – Assessing Competing Sustainability Agendas in Carbon Neutrality Policy Pathways. This framework enables the exploration of competing sustainability agendas arising from the simultaneous implementation of climate change, energy transitions, and energy poverty agendas. CompeSA is built on three key steps, 1) The WHAT, aiming to define the scope, 2) The WHERE, to understand the scales at which corresponding policy impacts apply; and 3) the WHO, for deep characterization and analysis of the key stakeholder groups.

We base the development and application of the framework in Portugal, a test case strongly engaged with the carbon neutrality agenda, to illustrate important dilemmas over policy mixes and unpack emerging synergies and barriers. Identified synergies include the linked concepts of economic recovery and employment opportunities, mainly through renewable energy expansion, enhanced economic competitiveness, and skilled job creation. Improvements in air quality and the built environment contribute to health benefits. The most significant barriers are inequitable benefit allocation and power imbalances between the energy-poor and agenda-setting actors. Our demonstration shows CompeSA to be a helpful support tool for structured analysis of competing sustainability agendas and pinpoints key critical points that determine the effectiveness of sustainability policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Transitions
Global Transitions Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reduction in inpatient and severe condition visits for respiratory diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China Cancer as a global health crisis with deep evolutionary roots Exploring the nexus: Comparing and aligning Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth The impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic exposure on current and future worldwide environmental protection across 18 nations in 6 continents The role of physical function and physical activity on cognitive function in the elderly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1